Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

BP's next challenge: Disposal of tainted sludge (BP saying waste is not toxic)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Robbien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-16-10 09:59 PM
Original message
BP's next challenge: Disposal of tainted sludge (BP saying waste is not toxic)
Oil giant BP is facing a huge new challenge in disposing of the millions of gallons of potentially toxic oil sludge its crews are collecting from the Gulf of Mexico, according to industry experts and veterans of past spills.

Crews so far have skimmed and sucked up 21.1 million gallons of oil mixed with water, according to the Deepwater Horizon Unified Command. Because the out-of-control well may continue spewing for months, that total almost certainly will surge.

BP's plan for handling the gooey mess, written in conjunction with the Coast Guard, the Environmental Protection Agency and Louisiana officials, calls for reclaiming or recycling as much as possible.

Some experts said that approach is the best option for the environment, but it has not worked in previous spills. It is not profitable to refine sludge that has mixed with water and seagoing debris because it can actually ruin refineries, they said.

"It has no longer got any economic value. It has to be disposed of as garbage," said Marc Jones, a former Navy officer who helped oversee numerous oil spill cleanups, including the 1989 Exxon Valdez in Alaska. "The stuff that got recovered from the Exxon Valdez was just a nightmare."

So far, BP has released little information about what it has done with the skimmed oil.

Mike Condon, BP's environmental division chief, said Wednesday that at least four barges filled with the waste had been shipped to disposal facilities in Texas and Alabama.

more . . .
http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2010-06-16-oil-wast...

one place receiving this stuff:

About 35,000 bags or 250 tons of oily trash have been carted away from this beach, said Lt. Patrick Hanley of the Coast Guard, who is stationed at Port Fourchon. And as of Monday, more than 175,000 gallons of liquid waste a combination of oil and water had been sent to landfills, as had 11,276 cubic yards of solid waste, said Petty Officer Gail Dale, also of the Coast Guard, who works with at the command center in Houma.

Michael Condon, BPs environmental unit leader, said that tests have shown that the material is not hazardous, and can safely be stored in landfills around the region that accept oil industry debris. The checklist and procedures involved, Mr. Condon said, are part of a process we do very well and have done for a long time.

But some local officials, environmental lawyers and residents who live near landfill sites are not convinced.

Theres no way that isnt toxic, said Gladstone Jones III, a New Orleans lawyer who has spent much of his career trying to get compensation for plaintiffs he says have been harmed by exposure to toxic waste.

In fact, waste from oil exploration and production falls into a regulatory no mans land, neither exactly benign nor toxic on its face. The compounds in oil most dangerous to human health like benzene, a carcinogen are volatile and tend to dissipate when crude oil reaches the ocean surface, or soon thereafter. But some toxicologists say it is impossible to know whether the toxic chemicals are entirely gone.

Marlin Ladner, a supervisor in Harrison County, Miss., spoke angrily about the prospect of debris from the spill being deposited in the local Pecan Grove landfill in his district.

His worry, he said, is that toxic material could leach into local aquifers from which more than 300 homes draw water.

BP oil is responsible for polluting our sand beaches and our estuaries, Mr. Ladner said.

Now, he added, They pick it up, put it on trucks, take it four or five miles north and dump it on us again.

more . . .
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/06/15/science/earth/15waste...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
jwirr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-16-10 10:02 PM
Response to Original message
1. Not tainted. For heavens sake, when we change oil in our cars we
are supposed to treat it as hazardous waste and not just throw it down the drain. Either it is toxic or it isn't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zoeisright Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-16-10 11:33 PM
Response to Original message
2. So if it's not toxic, they won't mind putting that crap in their own gardens.
I mean, really! Imagine the size of the tomatoes you could grow in that sludge! Of course, they would be purple, black, and deformed, but you can't have everything!

:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recursion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-16-10 11:49 PM
Response to Original message
3. Bleed. BP. Dry.
Keep them out of bankruptcy and string them along for as long as it takes to get every God damned cent that company owns. I want every single investor completely wiped out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Po_d Mainiac Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 06:57 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Every investor? Like pension funds? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recursion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 08:03 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Yes.
We all need a good reminder that when you invest in a company you're responsible for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Oct 17th 2019, 08:50 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC