Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

72 hrs to Stop the Big Oil Bailout

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
JohnWxy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-10 03:31 PM
Original message
72 hrs to Stop the Big Oil Bailout
Edited on Tue Jun-08-10 03:42 PM by JohnWxy
http://stopthebigoilbailout.com/


On June 10, the U.S. Senate will vote on Sen. Lisa Murkowski's Big Oil Bailout resolution that would prevent the EPA from holding polluters accountable, and fill Big Oil’s pockets with an additional $140 billion.


http://green.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/06/08/white-house-threatens-to-veto-move-to-thwart-e-p-a/">White House Threatens Veto of Move to Thwart E.P.A. - NYT

The White House made clear on Tuesday what had been assumed for months – that it does not like a resolution sponsored by Senator Lisa Murkowski, Republican of Alaska, that would thwart the Environmental Protection Agency’s ability to regulate greenhouse gases.

The White House says that if the resolution, scheduled for debate and a vote on Thursday, reaches President Obama’s desk, his advisers will recommend that he veto it. That’s what is known as a veto threat and in this case it is not a bluff.

The White House position, in a one-page document known as a Statement of Administration Policy, makes several arguments against the Murkowski resolution. It says that the measure would undermine the Clean Air Act and prevent the E.P.A. from complying with a 2007 Supreme Court decision requiring it to decide whether carbon dioxide and other climate-altering gases are a threat to human health and the environment.

The resolution would block implementation of a deal worked out between the government and auto manufacturers to increase auto efficiency and reduce vehicle emissions, the statement says. It would also strip the E.P.A. of its power to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from power plants, oil refineries and other large facilities and put the United States at a competitive disadvantage to countries which are adopting new clean energy technologies.

(more)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
KansDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-10 04:50 PM
Response to Original message
1. I can't believe in the wake of America's new emerging "Dead Sea"...
...that this kind of legislation is even being considered, let alone voted on!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnWxy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-10 06:47 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Lisa Murkowski Is Determined To Make Cheney's Chernobyl Even Worse
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 02:55 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC