ALTERMAN: WHAT NEXT? We invaded a country that we now know posed no threat

[dArKeR]

We invaded a country that we now know posed no threat to us and enjoyed no connection whatever to those who did.  In order to do so, we pulled manpower and resources away from the job of protecting us and thereby made ourselves more vulnerable to the thousands of new enemies we created with our failed, dishonest invasion.  OK, what next?

Let’s recap shall we?  We invaded a country that we now know posed no threat to us and enjoyed no connection whatever to those who did.  In order to do so, we pulled manpower and resources away from the job of protecting us and thereby made ourselves more vulnerable to the thousands of new enemies we created with our failed, dishonest invasion.  OK, what next?

How about we go through the nation we profess to be liberating, arrest a whole bunch of innocent people and then torture them  —raping a few here, killing a few there.  What next?  Well, what do you say we continue to this for a year after the Red Cross alerts us both to the fact of the torture as well as the innocence of ”70% to 90% of prisoners detained in Iraq since the war began last year?”

I don’t know about you, but I’m having trouble understanding why, at minimum, the term “criminal negligence” is not being used here.  If Rumsfeld really is responsible, and he says he is, then he should not merely be fired, but tried.  I know it’s more than he’s willing to offer an American citizen like Jose Padilla but I’m in a generous mood.  This being the Bush presidency, however, he is instead congratulated.  “You are doing a superb job.  You are a strong secretary of defense, and our nation owes you a debt of gratitude,” says the man who has just reached the lowest popularity point of his presidency.  I fear Mr. Orwell is looking more and more pollyanish every day.

http://msnbc.msn.com/id/3449870/

[donhakman]

1. Pollyanna, may I introduce Pandora?

I am thinking you guys are jaded to my efforts here.