Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Jeff Huber: Cockamamie COIN

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
laststeamtrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-19-09 02:54 PM
Original message
Jeff Huber: Cockamamie COIN
Cockamamie COIN

Posted by Jeff Huber

A new CBS poll says 69 percent of Americans think things are going badly in Afghanistan. Only 27 percent of Republicans think things are going well there. Yikes.


<snip>

Yet we continue to pursue a heavy military footprint approach to counterterrorism. This is partly because the Pentagon’s Long War strategy has little to do with combating terrorism. David Kilcullen, an adviser to Petraeus and McChrystal, says terrorism isn’t “at the top of my list” of reasons to persist in Afghanistan. He’s more worried about preserving NATO, the Cold War coalition that hasn’t had a reason to exist for 20 years.

Terrorism isn’t a reason we keep lingering in Iraq either. The Mesopotamia Mistake was never about terrorism, or weapons of mass destruction, or even Saddam Hussein. It was a neoconservative stratagem to invade and occupy the heart of the oil-rich Persian Gulf region.

We’re gushing blood and treasure into Southwest and Central Asia for no other reason than to keep the military-industrial cash caisson and gravy ship and wild-blue budget alive. COIN is a red herring, a deliberate attempt to distract attention from what’s really going on. The Pentagon and its kiss ups in Congress and the media and industry would have us believe that counterinsurgency and counter-terrorism are the same thing. They are not.

COIN, especially as we are practicing it, is about propping up the most corrupt governments on the planet. Counterterrorism is about going after terrorists. There’s a big difference. We’re not really going after terrorists. We’re seeking ways to keep the Army at war in order to justify its budget.

Little wonder it is that U.S. Army suicides are expected to rise for the fifth straight year. They know that the COIN doctrine they’re executing is a crock of horse feathers.

<more>

http://www.atlargely.com/atlargely/2009/11/cockamamie-coin.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+typepad%2Flariska%2Fatlargely+%28at-Largely%29&utm_content=My+Yahoo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
theoldman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-19-09 03:06 PM
Response to Original message
1. COIN as the name implies works against an insurgency.
The problem in Afghanistan is an insurgency in the form of the Taliban. The problem is not terrorism. The real question is why do we put an effort in COIN when our problem is terrorism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 07:14 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC