Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama Reverses Campaign Pledge to Renegotiate NAFTA

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
CHIMO Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-11-09 08:35 PM
Original message
Obama Reverses Campaign Pledge to Renegotiate NAFTA
President Obama has wrapped up a two-day visit to Mexico for talks with Mexican President Felipe Calderon and Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper. The three leaders met in Guadalajara to discuss issues including immigration reform, trade, Mexico’s drug war, the crisis in Honduras, and the swine flu outbreak. It was Obama’s first official summit under the North American Free Trade Agreement, or NAFTA. On the campaign trail, Obama had promised to open up NAFTA to renegotiations. But he’s backed off that pledge since taking office, blaming the global economic meltdown.

http://www.democracynow.org/2009/8/11/obama_reverses_campaign_pledge_to_renegotiate
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-11-09 08:38 PM
Response to Original message
1. He Changed His Thinking On That Months Ago
But NAFTA's not actually nearly as bad as almost-free trade with China, which has wiped out our manufacturing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-11-09 09:01 PM
Response to Reply #1
13. It all needs to be overturned . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
endless october Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-11-09 09:06 PM
Response to Reply #1
15. NAFTA and outsourcing are a big part of what brought us to this point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-11-09 09:27 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. Oh, No Question - We're Irretrievably Fucked
When Summers, Geithner, Clinton, and the rest of that crew were making it simple to outsource jobs, only a fool would think this wouldn't lead to the end of American manufacturing - there's no way on God's green Earth that American's can compete with $2-a-day workers. But we let them do it. At that time I was yelling and waving my arms around, but everyone told me to STFU and stop saying negative things about people who call themselves Democrats.

So here we are. And I'm still being told to STFU and stop saying negative things about people who call themselves Democrats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
endless october Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-13-09 08:30 PM
Response to Reply #16
23. it was obvious what would happen nationwide.
it happened in the midwest manufacturing belt years ago when the economy was still "good." only idiots thought it wouldn't go nationwide.

cut incomes / slash jobs, and people stop being able to purchase goods and services. goodbye, economy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flyarm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-11-09 09:28 PM
Response to Reply #1
17. From my files..and i have lots more in my files..or i should say ,..from the rabbit hole
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-11-09 09:35 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. Holy $%^&. I'd forgotten about that. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vincardog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-11-09 08:38 PM
Response to Original message
2. NAFTA and other faux flat earth free trade deals are the cause of global economic meltdown.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-11-09 08:39 PM
Response to Original message
3. Fascinating transcript of a lot of people who aren't Obama....
Quote of Obama saying he won't please?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CHIMO Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-11-09 08:54 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. You Had Best
Ask Amy Goodman that question. It is directly from the Democracy Now headline!

Since you asked:

Leaders meet as recession bites deep in Mexico

"In terms of refining some of our agreements, that is not where everyone's focus is right now because we are in the middle of a very difficult economic situation," Mr Obama said. Mexico is beset by its deepest recession of modern times.

http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/3436439c-8546-11de-9a64-00144feabdc0.html?nclick_check=1

Maybe your understanding of the statement is different from Democracy Now.

I prefer to follow Democracy Now.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tritsofme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-11-09 08:42 PM
Response to Original message
4. Many of us called it campaign trail politics at the time.
I thought he had even backed away from this in the GE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalmuse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-11-09 08:42 PM
Response to Original message
5. Well, fuck Obama for not overturning the last century's many fuckeries by now.
I've no patience for this shit. What are YOU ('YOU' as in everyone who has been incessantly criticizing one man for not waving his hand and fixing everything in less than a year) doing? Sitting on your ass and posting derogatory shit about your President on the internet? Or are you doing something constructive, like physically getting out there and helping him fix this mess? To expect one man to cater to your every progressive whim practically overnight is not very realistic. Wait in line, or get off your ass and fucking DO something to bring about the changes you want.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-11-09 08:48 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. People think that because he's not going to do it now
that he's backing off on it--when in fact he's fighting a war on every imaginable front and really cannot afford to kick over this rock right now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rudy23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-11-09 08:58 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. When W was in office, one man catered to every neoconservative whim.
I'm getting really sick of this argument. It's not that Obama's taking too long, it's that on many issues, he's moving in the back assward direction.

I'm all for getting involved, but believe it or not, most of us don't have the same kind of power as the president does on some of these issues. And many of us DID get up and do something---we volunteered and contributed to Obama's election. Then he turned right around and let his chief of staff call us "fucking stupid", as he's negotiating deals with drug companies to take the teeth out of healthcare reform.

Your kneejerk use of ad hominems makes you sound very trollish.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CHIMO Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-11-09 08:58 PM
Response to Reply #5
11. He Is Not My President
The post comes from Democracy Now.

If in your opinion Democracy Now is not a progressive site then...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-11-09 10:52 PM
Response to Reply #5
20. Mr. President insulted me today with his lame comments about
"intervening" in Honduras. You can tell when he is lying---he stammers and puts together weird sentences. When he is being real, he is eloquent. He was lame in Mexico.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
natrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-12-09 07:23 AM
Response to Reply #5
22. he's a puppet-my god, evey piece of major legislation is a giveawy to industry
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-11-09 08:43 PM
Response to Original message
6. No he didn't . This is the fourth time this has been posted here.

Next time why don't you include the President's remarks rather than simply post the mischarachterization of them?



“At a time when the economy has been shrinking drastically and trade has been shrinking around the world…we probably want to make the economy more stabilized in the coming months before we have a long discussion around further trade negotiations,” he said.


At no point has the President said that he doesn't want to have those conversations. With the world financial situation near implosion to an unprecedented liquidity melt down (please see Krugman and Soros) it would be highly reckless to have those negotiations before getting the economy back in place.

You have quoted a source that has purposely misrepresented the President's position. He never promised that he would address NAFTA problems before everyother more critical economic crises.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sharp_stick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-11-09 08:57 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. How dare you actually post a quote
of what the man said rather than listen to what a bunch of people say he said.

With some of the shit I read around here I think critical thinking is a skill that has been genetically diluted out of our gene pool.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-11-09 09:03 PM
Response to Reply #9
14. k i c k
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-11-09 09:38 PM
Response to Reply #6
19. Obama's Said That He Won't Unilaterally Re-Open NAFTA
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Boku-Wa Donating Member (80 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-11-09 11:47 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. Yes, but .... when campaigning in Ohio In March 2008 he attacked
NAFTA and said it was responsible for thousands of lost jobs.

Which Obama are we to believe? The liberal or the panderer to the neo-liberals?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-11-09 09:00 PM
Response to Original message
12. k i c k
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 06:51 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC