Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

health insurance corps terrifed 1/3 will dump them if there's a public option

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-05-09 08:48 PM
Original message
health insurance corps terrifed 1/3 will dump them if there's a public option
19 Million Americans Must Be Wrong

By Robert Parry
June 5, 2009

As the health insurance industry and its defenders in Congress lay out their case against permitting a public option in a reform bill, perhaps their most curious argument is that some 119 million Americans are ready to dump their private plans and jump to something more like Medicare – and that’s why the choice can’t be permitted.

In other words, the industry and its backers are acknowledging that more than one-third of the American people are so dissatisfied with their private health insurance that they trust the U.S. government to give them a fairer shake on health care. The industry says its allies in Congress must prevent that.

The peculiar argument that 119 million Americans must be denied the public option that they prefer has been made most notably by Sen. Chuck Grassley of Iowa, ranking Republican on the Senate Finance Committee, which is one of two panels that has jurisdiction over the health insurance bill.

“As many as 119 million Americans would shift from private coverage to the government plan,” Grassley wrote in a column for Politico.com. That migration, Grassley said, would “put America on the path toward a completely government-run health care system. … Eventually, the government plan would overtake the entire market.”

Grassley’s logic is that so many Americans would prefer a government-run plan that the private health insurance industry would collapse or become a shadow of its current self. That, in turn, would lead even more Americans entering the government plan, making private insurance even less viable.


http://www.consortiumnews.com/2009/060509.html|FULL TEXT>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Gormy Cuss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-05-09 08:50 PM
Response to Original message
1. They don't give people enough credit. I'd guess that 2/3s would dump them
and be happier with their costs & coverage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Teaser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-05-09 08:52 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Dunno...I don't think the government plan will match my current coverage
which is superb. I am an exception, of course, but I think your 2/3 number is a bit high.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-05-09 08:57 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Will your insurance cost go up if enough people transfer to a govt. program? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Teaser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-05-09 11:33 PM
Response to Reply #3
15. possibly. but doubtful, given the job I do
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maryf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-05-09 09:01 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Are full dental and vision covered? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Teaser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-05-09 11:32 PM
Response to Reply #4
14. yeah.
it's a sweet deal. But I'm a university professor, and we have it far too good in my line of work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maryf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-06-09 06:27 AM
Response to Reply #14
16. Well it wouldn't be much different
no copays, no deductible, choice of doctor/facility, no limits, and no preexisting conditions...PLUS, if you lose your job you don't have to get Cobra, coverage remains...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-06-09 08:46 PM
Response to Reply #14
24. Yeah, enjoy it now cuz later they will put the screws to you. I know....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DaLittle Kitty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-06-09 09:09 PM
Response to Reply #14
25. Saving The Horse And Buggy Was No REason To NOT Build Automobiles Was It?
The insurance bunch can find a new line of work if they cannot hold market share.

Here is my favored analysis on Single Payer by someone who knows what he's talking about.

http://www.johnrussellforcongress.com/page.asp?PageId=35
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gormy Cuss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-05-09 09:05 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. The question is, how many people have superb coverage now?
We have what is considered a great employer-provided plan yet each year the costs and co-pays increase dramatically and the coverage decreases either directly or indirectly through pre-approval review processes plus it's tied to employment. We'd switch to a public plan in a heartbeat and so would many of our similarly covered friends simply because it would no longer be tied to employment and the guidelines for covered events wouldn't be subject to the whims of the insurer to the degree that they are now. If enough people left private plans the insurance companies would market supplemental plans similar to those offered for Medicare.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uncle Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-06-09 03:06 PM
Response to Reply #1
20. I imagine this figure doesn't count children which probably make up 70 million,
Edited on Sat Jun-06-09 03:07 PM by Uncle Joe
and of course all the seniors on Medicare.

I don't imagine too many people out of the 300 million would keep for profit private "health" insurance, except the Congress.. oh yeah I forgot the government covers their health insurance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mythsaje Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-05-09 09:01 PM
Response to Original message
5. And what, exactly, does that say about the industry?
That it's FUCKED?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rurallib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-05-09 09:06 PM
Response to Original message
7. jeez - they will get treated just like they treated their 'customers'
do unto to other as they did it to you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cabluedem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-06-09 06:46 PM
Response to Reply #7
23. Dump them on the side of the road like they did us. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kenny blankenship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-05-09 09:11 PM
Response to Original message
8. We must have health care being delivered by private insurers and nothing may alter that
-no matter how many people it kills.

p0wnership society and all that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue Meany Donating Member (986 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-05-09 09:27 PM
Response to Original message
9. I think the real problem is that insurance companies will
cherrypick the healthy people and offer them really cheap insurance, and the government will be stuck insuring those who are not in the best of health. Then it will look like the govt can't do it as efficiently: kind of like the comparsion between the post office and Fedex.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thelordofhell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-05-09 09:31 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. I think your example could be better
try "kind of like the comparison between public and private schools"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zeos3 Donating Member (912 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-05-09 09:40 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. This is a valid concern
It's long been a strategy of the GOP to under fund and sabotage government programs to make it look like the only way to get something done is through the private sector. That's why we have to be careful with how the public option is designed, to avoid these types of shenanigans. They always try to play games with Medicare now. They try to de-fund it, they try to decrease the doctor's pay, etc.

If done properly, the government option would (hopefully) mean an end to private insurance as we know it today. If they remain as supplemental insurance or as an option to those that want it, that's fine but the current system must be done away with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-05-09 11:00 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. we should cherry pick some insurance execs and prosecute them for murder
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enthusiast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-06-09 04:18 PM
Response to Reply #13
22. Right on, yurbud!
:fistbump:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iwillnevergiveup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-06-09 10:34 PM
Response to Reply #9
27. They already have
by singling out "pre-existing conditions." The very folks who neeed health care the most.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Magistrate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-05-09 09:35 PM
Response to Original message
11. In Other Words, Sir, Most Americans Want out Of The Private Health Insurance Racket
And make no mistake, it is a racket. the only people who say they are satisfied with their health insurance are people who have never had to file a major claim....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NorthCarolina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-06-09 08:14 AM
Response to Original message
17. 1/3 sounds like a conservative estimate to me
depending on the *public plan* offered.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Froward69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-06-09 09:18 AM
Response to Original message
18. "making private insurance even less viable."
Edited on Sat Jun-06-09 09:19 AM by Froward69
thats a nice way of saying, "making private insurance even less Valuable." not that it is worth its current cost by any means. but the market would have to readjust to real competition. The Insurance company's would be forced to either reduce the profit margin. or reduce bounouses to those that would deny payment for care.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-06-09 03:21 PM
Response to Reply #18
21. that's the best reason TO do it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tavalon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-06-09 10:04 AM
Response to Original message
19. Relax, it won't be 1/3, it will be much closer to 3/4
Relax because if we can, we will destroy you just as you have tried to destroy us you bloodsucking bastards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DaLittle Kitty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-06-09 09:12 PM
Response to Original message
26. So What Is Wrong With That?
The insurance industry has had it toooo good for tooo long , unobstructed and damn near un-regulated. Fuck 'em!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-07-09 03:00 AM
Response to Reply #26
28. I would like to, but I'd get a disease.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-07-09 07:16 AM
Response to Original message
29. "Let the market decide" ...right?
no apparently not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 09:10 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC