Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Washington Post: A Prime Time to Ask The President Questions

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Qanisqineq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-14-04 01:26 AM
Original message
Washington Post: A Prime Time to Ask The President Questions
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A9997-2004Apr13.html

A Prime Time to Ask The President Questions

By Tom Shales
Wednesday, April 14, 2004; Page C01

"When I say something, I mean it," George W. Bush said decisively near the end of last night's prime-time presidential news conference. Nobody called out, "When will you say something?" -- the White House press corps is too mannerly for that -- but some reporters, and some viewers, must have been thinking it.

One network reporter predicted accurately beforehand that Bush would vow to "stay the course" in Iraq -- reviving one of the most inescapable clichés of daddy Bush's years in office. What the people of the United States as well as the people of Iraq want to hear, the reporter said, is what "the course" is. Bush said he would stick to the June 30 deadline for handing the government over to Iraqis but also said the U.S. military presence there would continue after that date.

<snip>

Earlier still, Bush stopped in mid-answer and for a few seconds appeared to have lost his train of thought. Looking anxious, he fell back on phrases and thoughts he'd used earlier, saying he and the world changed after 9/11, which was a truism, and that in the 21st century, America is no longer protected by the oceans on either side. But that's been true since the invention of nuclear weapons and of missiles to deliver them from halfway around the world.

After the news conference, CBS News anchor Dan Rather said Bush had come across as "steady, competent and forceful" while answering questions but that he delivered his opening statement "in a rather flat monotone," perhaps intentionally. It was a peculiar performance; Bush would look down, read a sentence, look up, look around, pause slightly, then look down and read another sentence.

Although the short speech was well-written, especially toward the end, Bush looked upon it as an address in which all sentences were created equal. He never stressed any particular point or added any emphasis. He might as well have been reading letters off an eye chart.

On NBC, reporter David Gregory, who'd been among those asking Bush questions in the East Room of the White House, said the president was "filibustering at times" with his meandering responses. Indeed, most of the questions seemed to go unanswered. A reporter asked, twice, why Bush and Vice President Cheney insisted on appearing together when they testify before the 9/11 commission. Bush ignored the question both times, uttering familiar generalities instead.

In contrast to the emotionless delivery of his prepared remarks, during the Q&A Bush appeared passionate at times, answering journalists' questions with an almost religious fervor. Bush said that freedom was given to Americans by "the Almighty" and encouraging freedom throughout the world is "what we have been called to do." Later he said, "It's a conviction that's deep in my soul."

<snip>

Fox had already scuttled a telecast of its gigantically popular "American Idol" to make room for the president and will air the show tonight instead. Anyone tuning in and expecting to see an American idol saw an American president instead -- one who didn't exactly seem confused but who at times appeared to be teetering on the very brink of confusion.

And yet people responding to polls today will probably give Bush points for just showing up. By having so few televised news conferences, he's made the ones he does have into big events. By expressing tremendous confidence in his own judgment and actions, even to the point of not being able to recall a single mistake, it's likely Bush made Americans feel a renewed confidence as well.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Dover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-14-04 01:38 AM
Response to Original message
1. LOL! Now THIS is great journalism. Tom Shales, where have you been?!
Absolutely spot on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-14-04 01:38 AM
Response to Original message
2. PUFF PIECE ALERT!
And yet people responding to polls today will probably give Bush points for just showing up. By having so few televised news conferences, he's made the ones he does have into big events. By expressing tremendous confidence in his own judgment and actions, even to the point of not being able to recall a single mistake, it's likely Bush made Americans feel a renewed confidence as well.

A real reporter, on the other hand, would confess that the questions and answers are rehearsed, ask why there are so few televised news conferences, wonder where one draws the line between self-confidence and self-deception, and point out that EVERYBODY makes mistakes.

:puffpiece:
rocknation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tedzbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-14-04 01:41 AM
Response to Original message
3. Was Dan Rather watching the same event as me?
I had the opposite conclusion. He seemed out of his depth when trying to field the questions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muchacho Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-14-04 03:41 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Rather's been a shill
..since his tearful confession on David Letterman saying about Bush "Wherever he wants me to line up, tell me where."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KissMyAsscroft Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-14-04 02:01 AM
Response to Original message
4. Another Bullshit Article....



Another article that will not just say that the guy is a fucking moron. He is just extra-strength stupid.

STUPID.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moderator DU Moderator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-15-04 02:59 PM
Response to Original message
6. Tolania
Per DU copyright rules
please post only four
paragraphs from the
news source.


Thank you.

DU moderator
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Miss Authoritiva Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-15-04 08:05 PM
Response to Original message
7. Where's Stuttering John when you need him
Remember when Howard Stern's reporter provocateur asked Gennifer Flowers at a mainstream news conference if she and Bill Clinton used condoms when they allegedly had sex? That's the kind of reporter we need in the White House press corps. Someone who will shout out, "When will you say something?" whenever Bush declares "When I say something, I mean it."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
myopic4141 Donating Member (309 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-15-04 11:10 PM
Response to Original message
8. Are Shrubs weeds?
I have always wondered who the anchors and commentators were watching when describing Shrubby's speeches and news conferences. His pauses are disruptive to the train of thought and his facial expressions are very unnerving to watch. More often than not, there is a facial expression (called a smirk) whenever there is suppose to be some clever line. I have almost come to the conclusion that those commenting just read the text instead of watching and listening while thinking how they would give the speech and then comment on that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 02:29 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC