Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Patrick Lang: Let's take a good look at Iran

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
laststeamtrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-09 01:39 PM
Original message
Patrick Lang: Let's take a good look at Iran
Let's take a good look at Iran
Patrick Lang

The CIA Vs. the Mullahs
By Reuel Marc Gerecht
Tuesday, January 27, 2009

"CIA Director-designate Leon Panetta should consider a bipartisan review of intelligence collection concerning Tehran. Since the Obama administration is reviewing policy options toward the Islamic republic, it would seem sensible to know what Langley's actions have produced. Policy built on weak intelligence and analysis obviously isn't a good idea."...http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/01/26/AR2009012601874.html

Reuel, like nearly all CIA alumni, continues to instinctively believe that the CIA IS the intelligence community. Such old think" is pathetically out of date in a world in which Admiral Blair made it very clear at his installation ceremony that Leon Panetta will be one of his several subordinates.

But, this is clealy a case of "mind over matter." Blair does not mind and the "ancien regime" of CIA nostalgics do not matter.

Nevertheless, Reuel has a good idea. There is little that is as important as the truth about Iran. The Israelis have one view of things and the US intelligence community has another. Reuel undoubtedly prefers the Israeli view.

Admiral Blair, not Panetta, would be wise to order just such a review as Gerecht suggests.

What should it be called? Ah. Perhaps "National Intelligence Estimate - Iran" would be a good title....http://turcopolier.typepad.com/sic_semper_tyrannis/2009/01/lets-take-a-good-look-at-iran.html
*

Reuel is a senior fellow at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies. A neocon think(?) tank.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foundation_for_the_Defense_of_Democracies
http://www.rightweb.irc-online.org/profile/1475.html
http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Foundation_for_the_Defense_of_Democracies
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Azooz Donating Member (271 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-09 03:32 PM
Response to Original message
1. The CIA Vs. the Mullahs?
The Shah was "replaced" with a Mullah - automatic theocracy with built in corruption and well balanced corruption limits.

The Taliban was "replaced" with a Mullah

Saddam was "replaced" with a Mullah

If it is really "The CIA Vs. the Mullahs", then the CIA seem to be playing to lose.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 02:40 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC