Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama's Intervention Indirectly Led to Case (NYT)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-08 12:54 AM
Original message
Obama's Intervention Indirectly Led to Case (NYT)
Edited on Wed Dec-10-08 12:54 AM by struggle4progress
By MIKE McINTIRE and JEFF ZELENY
Published: December 9, 2008

.. Barack Obama’s .. phone call .. three months ago to urge passage of a state ethics bill indirectly contributed to the downfall of .. Gov. Rod R. Blagojevich.

Mr. Obama placed the call to his political mentor, Emil Jones Jr., president of the Illinois Senate. Mr. Jones was a critic of the legislation, which sought to curb the influence of money in politics, as was Mr. Blagojevich, who had vetoed it. But after the call from Mr. Obama, the Senate overrode the veto, prompting the governor to press state contractors for campaign contributions before the law’s restrictions could take effect on Jan. 1, prosecutors say ...

When the Illinois Senate passed the measure by 55 to 0 on Sept. 22, with Mr. Jones reversing his position, Mr. Obama praised the move as one creating “a tougher ethics law that will reduce the influence of money over our state’s political process” ...

Mr. Blagojevich was busily trying to shake loose up to $2.5 million in campaign donations, much of it from contributors with business before the state, according to federal prosecutors. The governor’s goal was to bring in the money before the end of the year, the complaint said, “before a new state ethics law goes into effect on Jan. 1, 2009.”

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/12/10/us/politics/10chicago.html?_r=1&ref=us
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
FreeJG Donating Member (304 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-08 12:59 AM
Response to Original message
1. you are kidding yourself....
this is HUGE! they are all in it up to their ears!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-08 01:01 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. !!!!!!!11
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-08 01:30 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Gotta link? A reality-based community prefers accusations that come with evidence
And welcome to DU! :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
surrealAmerican Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-08 09:34 PM
Response to Original message
4. So, it's a case of hurry up and cheat before the deadline.
Too bad the new ethics law couldn't have been effective immediately on passage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 07:27 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC