Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

San Francisco's Prostitutes Support a Proposition

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-31-08 11:40 PM
Original message
San Francisco's Prostitutes Support a Proposition
Edited on Sat Nov-01-08 12:21 AM by struggle4progress
By JESSE McKINLEY
Published: October 31, 2008

SAN FRANCISCO — When Proposition K was added to Tuesday’s ballot, many people likely snickered at the possibility that San Francisco might take its place alongside such prostitute-friendly havens as Amsterdam and a few rural counties in nearby Nevada.

But this week, it became readily apparent that city officials are not laughing anymore about the measure, which would effectively decriminalize the world’s oldest profession in San Francisco. At a news conference on Wednesday, Mayor Gavin Newsom and other opponents seemed genuinely worried that Proposition K might pass.

“This is not cute. This is not fanciful,” Mr. Newsom said, standing in front of the pink-on-pink facade of a closed massage parlor in the Tenderloin district. “This is a big mistake.”

Supporters of the measure say it is a long-overdue correction of a criminal approach toward prostitutes, which neither rehabilitates nor helps them, and often ignores their complaints of abuse ...

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/01/us/01prostitute.html?_r=1&adxnnl=1&oref=slogin&adxnnlx=1225513875-AjE/qql83cn2359EETkkUA

<edit: subject line html>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
47of74 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-31-08 11:45 PM
Response to Original message
1. Maybe Bill-O-The-Clown would have a change of heart about S.F....
If he knew he could get some loving down there for money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sarcasmo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-01-08 07:59 PM
Response to Original message
2. This shouldn't even be an issue, it should be legal. Our sexually repressed country, what a shame.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 01:55 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC