Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

With Palin’s Returns, Tax Profs Move Back to the Spotlight

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-08 09:15 AM
Original message
With Palin’s Returns, Tax Profs Move Back to the Spotlight
With Palin’s Returns, Tax Profs Move Back to the Spotlight
Posted by Dan Slater



Alaska Governor, Sarah Palin, listens to questions during an interview in her office, Dec. 13, 2007. (AP Photo/Chris Miller, File)
Tax lawyers are feasting on Sarah Palin’s tax returns. On Friday, the Alaska Governor and Republican vice presidential nominee released her returns and personal financial disclosure report. According to the WSJ, they showed her to be the lowest earner of the four national candidates. According to tax law profs Jack Bogdanski, of Lewis & Clark, and Bryan Camp, of Texas Tech, they also show that she owes tens of thousands of dollars in additional taxes, penalties and interest. (Here’s another report from the NYT.)

Click here for a round-up from the Tax Prof blog’s Paul Caron.

Bogdanski writes that there’s “no serious debate . . . about the fact that at least the amounts paid for the children’s travel — $24,728.83 in 2007, according to the Washington Post — are taxable. The campaign’s tax lawyer has got at least that much of the law, and perhaps more, wrong. . . . And the fact that the state payroll office got it wrong, too, doesn’t erase the Palins’ unpaid tax liability.”

Professor Camp gives us a line-item analysis:

The Palins did not report as income some $17,000 that Governor Palin’s employer (the State of Alaska) paid her as an “allowance” for her travel. Can they do that? Yes, most likely.

The Palins did not report as income some $43,000 that the State of Alaska paid the Governor as an “allowance” for her husband and children’s travel. Can they do that? No, most likely not.

more:http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2008/10/06/with-palins-returns-tax-profs-move-back-to-the-spotlight/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-06-08 09:19 AM
Response to Original message
1. So...add "tax cheat" to her other career highlights--wolf slaughter, rape-kit charges as mayor,
per diem payments for living at home, Troopergate, hiring a high-school buddy for Agriculture Secretary because the woman "always liked cows", buying herself an SUV on Wasilla's dime, leaving her town in debt, letting (high-school-diploma'd) Todd do most of her budget work. Could go on and on--how did this woman become Governor, Alaska?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 07:57 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC