Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login

Vincent Bugliosi! "The Prosecution of George W. Bush for Murder" (how about Mass Murder?)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-11-08 04:39 PM
Original message
Vincent Bugliosi! "The Prosecution of George W. Bush for Murder" (how about Mass Murder?)
Published on Friday, May 9, 2008 by
The Prosecution of George W. Bush for Murder
by Vincent Bugliosi

There is direct evidence that President George W. Bush did not honorably lead this nation, but deliberately misled it into a war he wanted. Bush and his administration knowingly lied to Congress and to the American public lies that have cost the lives of more than 4,000 young American soldiers and close to $1 trillion.

A Monumental Lie

In his first nationally televised address on the Iraqi crisis on October 7, 2002, six days after receiving the National Intelligence Estimate (NIE), a classified CIA report, President Bush told millions of Americans the exact opposite of what the CIA was telling him -a monumental lie to the nation and the world.

On the evening of October 7, 2002, the very latest CIA intelligence was that Hussein was not an imminent threat to the U.S. This same information was delivered to the Bush administration as early as October 1, 2002, in the NIE, including input from the CIA and 15 other U.S. intelligence agencies. In addition, CIA director George Tenet briefed Bush in the Oval Office on the morning of October 7th.

According to the October 1, 2002 NIE, Baghdad for now appears to be drawing a line short of conducting terrorist attacks with conventional or CBW against the United States, fearing that exposure of Iraqi involvement would provide Washington a stronger case for making war. The report concluded that Hussein was not planning to use any weapons of mass destruction; further, Hussein would only use weapons of mass destruction he was believed to have if he were first attacked, that is, he would only use them in self-defense.

Preparing its declassified version of the NIE for Congress, which became known as the White Paper, the Bush administration edited the classified NIE document in ways that significantly changed its inference and meaning, making the threat seem imminent and ominous.

In the original NIE report, members of the U.S. intelligence community vigorously disagreed with the CIAs bloated and inaccurate conclusions. All such opposing commentary was eliminated from the declassified White Paper prepared for Congress and the American people.

The Manning Memo

On January 31, 2003, Bush met in the Oval Office with British Prime Minister Tony Blair. In a memo summarizing the meeting discussion, Blairs chief foreign policy advisor David Manning wrote that Bush and Blair expressed their doubts that any chemical, biological, or nuclear weapons would ever be found in Iraq, and that there was tension between Bush and Blair over finding some justification for the war that would be acceptable to other nations. Bush was so worried about the failure of the UN inspectors to find hard evidence against Hussein that he talked about three possible ways, Manning wrote, to provoke a confrontation with Hussein. One way, Bush said, was to fly U2 reconnaissance aircraft with fighter cover over Iraq, painted in UN colors. If Saddam fired on them, he would be in breach of UN resolutions and that would justify war. Bush was calculating to create a war, not prevent one.

Denying Blixs Findings

Hans Blix, the United Nations chief weapons inspector in Iraq, in his March 7, 2003, address to the UN Security Council, said that as of that date, less than 3 weeks before Bush invaded Iraq, that Iraq had capitulated to all demands for professional, no-notice weapons inspections all over Iraq and agreed to increased aerial surveillance by the U.S. over the no-fly zones. Iraq had directed the UN inspectors to sites where illicit weapons had been destroyed and had begun to demolish its Al Samoud 2 missiles, as requested by the UN. Blix added that no evidence of proscribed activities have so far been found by his inspectors and no underground facilities for chemical or biological production or storage were found so far. He said that for his inspectors to absolutely confirm that Iraq had no weapons of mass destruction (WMD) will not take years, nor weeks, but months.

Mohamed ElBaradei, the chief UN nuclear inspector in Iraq and director of the International Atomic Energy Agency, told the UN Security Council that, we have to date found no evidence or plausible indication of the revival of a nuclear weapon program in Iraq.

The UN inspectors were making substantial progress and Hussein was giving them unlimited access. Why was Bush in such an incredible rush to go to war?

Hussein Disarms, so Bush Goes to War

When it became clear that the whole purpose of Bushs prewar campaign to get Hussein to disarm was being (or already had been) met, Bush and his people came up with a demand they had never once made before that Hussein resign and leave Iraq. On March 17, 2003, Bush said in a speech to the nation that, Saddam Hussein and his sons must leave Iraq within 48 hours. Their refusal to do so will result in military conflict. Military conflict the lives of thousands of young Americans on the line because Bush trumped up a new line in the sand?

The Niger Allegation

One of the most notorious instances of the Bush administration using thoroughly discredited information to frighten the American public was the 16 words in Bushs January 28, 2003 State of the Union speech: The British government has learned that Saddam Hussein recently sought significant quantities of uranium from Africa. The Niger allegation was false, and the Bush administration knew it was false.

Joseph C. Wilson IV, the former ambassador to Iraq, was sent to Niger by the CIA in February 2002 to investigate a supposed memo that documented the sale of uranium yellowcake (a form of lightly processed ore) to Iraq by Niger in the late 1990s. Wilson reported back to the CIA that it was highly doubtful such a transaction had ever taken place.

On March 7, 2003, Mohamed ElBaradei told the UN Security Council that based on thorough analysis his agency concluded that the documents which formed the basis for the report of recent uranium transactions between Iraq and Niger are in fact not authentic. Indeed, author Craig Unger uncovered at least 14 instances prior to the 2003 State of the Union address in which analysts at the CIA, the State Department, or other government agencies that had examined the Niger documents raised serious doubts about their legitimacy only to be rebuffed by Bush administration officials who wanted to use them.

On October 5 and 6, 2002, the CIA sent memos to the National Security Council, National Security Advisor Condoleezza Rice, and to the White House Situation Room stating that the Niger information was no good.

On January 24, 2003, four days before the presidents State of the Union address, the CIAs National Intelligence Council, which oversees all federal agencies that deal with intelligence, sent a memo to the White House stating that the Niger story is baseless and should be laid to rest.

The 9/11 Lie

The Bush administration put undue pressure on U.S. intelligence agencies to provide it with conclusions that would help them in their quest for war. Bushs former counterterrorism chief, Richard Clarke, said that on September 12, 2001, one day after 9/11, The President in a very intimidating way left us me and my staff with the clear indication that he wanted us to come back with the word that there was an Iraqi hand behind 9/11.

Bush said on October 7, 2002, We know that Iraq and the Al Qaeda terrorist network share a common enemy the United States of America. We know that Iraq and Al Qaeda have had high level contacts that go back a decade, and that Iraq has trained Al Qaeda members in bomb-making and poisons and deadly gasses. Of Hussein, he said on November 1, 2002, We know hes got ties with Al Qaeda.

Even after Bush admitted on September 17, 2003, that he had no evidence that Saddam Hussein was involved with 9/11, he audaciously continued, in the months and years that followed, to clearly suggest, without stating it outright, that Hussein was involved in 9/11.

On March 20, 2006, Bush said, I was very careful never to say that Saddam Hussein ordered the attack on America.

Vincent Bugliosi received his law degree in 1964. In his career at the L.A. County District Attorneys office, he successfully prosecuted 105 out of 106 felony jury trials, including 21 murder convictions without a single loss. His most famous trial, the Charles Manson case, became the basis of his classic, Helter Skelter, the biggest selling true-crime book in publishing history. The Prosecution of George W. Bush For Murder is available May 27.

For more information visit /
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
truedelphi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-11-08 04:43 PM
Response to Original message
1. Bugliosi must know that we HAVE TO prosecute Cheney
Edited on Sun May-11-08 04:43 PM by truedelphi
As well as Bush - in fact, don't most of us wanna see Bush convicted after Cheney?/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
poebango Donating Member (53 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-11-08 04:56 PM
Response to Original message
2. What about the millions of Iraqis?
I know he means well, and I'm glad he is doing this -- but there's this thing that I read so often and it really burns me up: when in describing the damage and loss, people just refer to the 4,000 AMERICANS and our treasure lost. No mention of the tens upon tens of thousands of Iraqis killed, the MILLIONS Iraqis wounded, maimed, physically and psychologically, and those whom have been forced out of their homes and life. Is that not important to mention?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
OwnedByFerrets Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-11-08 05:03 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. You beat me to it....
I was gonna say the same thing. I try to bring this up every time the 4000 are mentioned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
poebango Donating Member (53 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-11-08 05:09 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. I'm glad you agree
It always makes me wonder: Is that how the speaker thinks? If so, what does that say about him as an actual caring human being? Or does the speaker think that he can only appeal to the American conscience by focusing solely on Americans? And if that's so, what does that say about his actual opinion of us as Americans? Either way, leaving out the hellish destruction we have wrought upon the Iraqi people is just not just wrong, it is evil.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
OwnedByFerrets Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-11-08 07:20 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Yes, pure evil....
we can only hope to restore some semblance of the America I grew up with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
OwnedByFerrets Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-11-08 07:21 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. And, welcome to DU!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
poebango Donating Member (53 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-11-08 07:55 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Gracias!
I am chuckling at your name. For one, I love ferrets. And two, I now live in Mexico, and the word for hardware store is "ferreteria". My parents also live here now (retired), and whenever we need some tool or duct tape or whatever, my dad always says "Let's go to the weasel store". Thank you for your thoughtful posting and for welcoming me. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
slipslidingaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-11-08 08:35 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. This always burns me up as well, 5 million people displaced
and literally countless numbers of civilians killed, yet THOSE people are too often forgotten in our dialogue. :(

There was a hearing in Congress on the number of civilian casualties, the lack of interest from members of Congress was downright sad.

Welcome to DU.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
poebango Donating Member (53 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-11-08 09:11 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. I don't get it either
Thanks for the welcome! :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
slipslidingaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-11-08 08:24 PM
Response to Original message
8. Agree that they should be held accountable, unfortunately that is
not how people voted.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Jan 19th 2018, 02:58 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC