Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login

The Gaza Bombshell - (Iran-Contra 2.0)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
kevinmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-08-08 11:15 PM
Original message
I heard about this story on THIS IS HELL today. Been talked about all over Europe and the Middle East .... and is mute in the USA.

After failing to anticipate Hamass victory over Fatah in the 2006 Palestinian election, the White House cooked up yet another scandalously covert and self-defeating Middle East debacle: part Iran-contra, part Bay of Pigs. With confidential documents, corroborated by outraged former and current U.S. officials, David Rose reveals how President Bush, Condoleezza Rice, and Deputy National-Security Adviser Elliott Abrams backed an armed force under Fatah strongman Muhammad Dahlan, touching off a bloody civil war in Gaza and leaving Hamas stronger than ever

by David Rose / Vanity Fair

Excerpted - Iran-Contra 2.0

Under Bill Clinton, Dahlan says, commitments of security assistance were always delivered, absolutely. Under Bush, he was about to discover, things were different. At the end of 2006, Dayton promised an immediate package worth $86.4 millionmoney that, according to a U.S. document published by Reuters on January 5, 2007, would be used to dismantle the infrastructure of terrorism and establish law and order in the West Bank and Gaza. U.S. officials even told reporters the money would be transferred in the coming days.

The cash never arrived. Nothing was disbursed, Dahlan says. It was approved and it was in the news. But we received not a single penny.

Any notion that the money could be transferred quickly and easily had died on Capitol Hill, where the payment was blocked by the House Subcommittee on the Middle East and South Asia. Its members feared that military aid to the Palestinians might end up being turned against Israel.

Dahlan did not hesitate to voice his exasperation. I spoke to Condoleezza Rice on several occasions, he says. I spoke to Dayton, to the consul general, to everyone in the administration I knew. They said, You have a convincing argument. We were sitting in Abbass office in Ramallah, and I explained the whole thing to Condi. And she said, Yes, we have to make an effort to do this. Theres no other way.  At some of these meetings, Dahlan says, Assistant Secretary Welch and Deputy National-Security Adviser Abrams were also present.

The administration went back to Congress, and a reduced, $59 million package for nonlethal aid was approved in April 2007. But as Dahlan knew, the Bush team had already spent the past months exploring alternative, covert means of getting him the funds and weapons he wanted. The reluctance of Congress meant that you had to look for different pots, different sources of money, says a Pentagon official.

A State Department official adds, Those in charge of implementing the policy were saying, Do whatever it takes. We have to be in a position for Fatah to defeat Hamas militarily, and only Muhammad Dahlan has the guile and the muscle to do this. The expectation was that this was where it would end upwith a military showdown. There were, this official says, two parallel programsthe overt one, which the administration took to Congress, and a covert one, not only to buy arms but to pay the salaries of security personnel.

In essence, the program was simple. According to State Department officials, beginning in the latter part of 2006, Rice initiated several rounds of phone calls and personal meetings with leaders of four Arab nationsEgypt, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates. She asked them to bolster Fatah by providing military training and by pledging funds to buy its forces lethal weapons. The money was to be paid directly into accounts controlled by President Abbas.

The scheme bore some resemblance to the Iran-contra scandal, in which members of Ronald Reagans administration sold arms to Iran, an enemy of the U.S. The money was used to fund the contra rebels in Nicaragua, in violation of a congressional ban. Some of the money for the contras, like that for Fatah, was furnished by Arab allies as a result of U.S. lobbying.

But there are also important differencesstarting with the fact that Congress never passed a measure expressly prohibiting the supply of aid to Fatah and Dahlan. It was close to the margins, says a former intelligence official with experience in covert programs. But it probably wasnt illegal.

Legal or not, arms shipments soon began to take place. In late December 2006, four Egyptian trucks passed through an Israeli-controlled crossing into Gaza, where their contents were handed over to Fatah. These included 2,000 Egyptian-made automatic rifles, 20,000 ammunition clips, and two million bullets. News of the shipment leaked, and Benjamin Ben-Eliezer, an Israeli Cabinet member, said on Israeli radio that the guns and ammunition would give Abbas the ability to cope with those organizations which are trying to ruin everythingnamely, Hamas.

Avi Dichter points out that all weapons shipments had to be approved by Israel, which was understandably hesitant to allow state-of-the-art arms into Gaza. One things for sure, we werent talking about heavy weapons, says a State Department official. It was small arms, light machine guns, ammunition.

Perhaps the Israelis held the Americans back. Perhaps Elliott Abrams himself held back, unwilling to run afoul of U.S. law for a second time. One of his associates says Abrams, who declined to comment for this article, felt conflicted over the policytorn between the disdain he felt for Dahlan and his overriding loyalty to the administration. He wasnt the only one: There were severe fissures among neoconservatives over this, says Cheneys former adviser David Wurmser. We were ripping each other to pieces.

During a trip to the Middle East in January 2007, Rice found it difficult to get her partners to honor their pledges. The Arabs felt the U.S. was not serious, one official says. They knew that if the Americans were serious they would put their own money where their mouth was. They didnt have faith in Americas ability to raise a real force. There was no follow-through. Paying was different than pledging, and there was no plan.

This official estimates that the program raised a few payments of $30 millionmost of it, as other sources agree, from the United Arab Emirates. Dahlan himself says the total was only $20 million, and confirms that the Arabs made many more pledges than they ever paid. Whatever the exact amount, it was not enough.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mth44sc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-08-08 11:25 PM
Response to Original message
1. "Elliott Abrams"
say no more...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Kaotac Donating Member (59 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 09:54 AM
Response to Original message
2. dubyu tee eff.
That's insane. Gorram neocons
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Doctor_J Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 11:15 AM
Response to Original message
3. The difference is that now the media are part of the government
so none of this will be reported in the MSM, and thus will never be punished.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Jan 20th 2018, 12:46 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC