Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Karl "turd blossom"Rove Linked to Siegelman Prosecution

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Bravo Zulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-11-07 11:31 AM
Original message
Karl "turd blossom"Rove Linked to Siegelman Prosecution
Significant new information is appearing on the Siegelman case, in the form of the 143-page deposition of Jill Simpson, a Republican lawyer who previously issued an affidavit that described a telephone conversation in which Alabama’s leading G.O.P. strategist described Rove intervening with the Justice Department to get the Siegelman case going. The deposition is backed by a mountain of documents that corroborate Simpson’s statements on most critical points. The transcript was leaked by Republican Judiciary Committee staffers earlier in the week to the vest-pocket publication of the Alabama G.O.P., the Birmingham News, as I noted yesterday. Today, however, Time magazine weighs in with an accurate account of the transcript

For months, the Alabama Republican machine has attempted to brush off claims about Rove’s involvement as some sort of fantastic speculation. Those efforts have just been exploded. We are one step closer to understanding why Karl Rove left the White House, and perhaps also why Alberto Gonzales stepped down as attorney general. The Siegelman case is emerging, as we predicted, as the most damning exhibit yet in the story of the Bush Administration’s use of the Justice Department as a partisan political tool.
http://harpers.org/subjects/NoComment
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
notadmblnd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-11-07 11:40 AM
Response to Original message
1. This is how this admin operates across the board
I believe this is why our democrats in congress have no spine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chaumont58 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-11-07 11:53 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. I have to agree
We are supposed to be a nation of laws, but the repukes operate without any restraint of laws whatsoever. Remember Susan McDougall(sp?). The repuke sherrif of Los Angeles County put her in the Sybal Brand Institute in LA. Sybil Brand is a place for hard core criminals, not political prisoners. Now, there is some evidence that a former governor of state has become a political prisoner. Our wonderfull collection of beltway whores can not be bothered to stop fellating chimpie for even a few minutes to investigate.
I do not have high hopes that even the coming election of 2008 will change much. Right in the middle of the Democratic Party is the DLC. Joe Lieberman is the poster boy for the DLC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lyonn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-11-07 11:57 AM
Response to Original message
3. What an evil web this admin. weaves
The guy got 88 months and there is evidence of corruption by the White House during Siegelman's prosecution?? We shall see how our Judicial Committee will proceed on this.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondie58 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-11-07 12:06 PM
Response to Original message
4. this poor woman needs to be in the witness protection program
these thugs will stop at nothing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Froward69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-11-07 12:22 PM
Response to Original message
5. A page from Herbert Hoover
I feel this is a reason Congressional Dems seem timid. Except Joe biden for some reason.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-11-07 12:54 PM
Response to Original message
6. Who is this Session guy? Does he have a past?
Was he involved with the Clarence Thomas selection or the Bush v. Gore fiasco? Or was it the Monica Lewinsky thing? The name rings a very big bell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 09:56 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC