Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Robert Parry: Bush's War Without End

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-14-07 09:29 AM
Original message
Robert Parry: Bush's War Without End
Bush's War Without End

By Robert Parry
September 14, 2007

Let it be noted that the morning after George W. Bush announced an open-ended possibly permanent military occupation of Iraq the premier U.S. newspapers ran headlines about the President ordering troop cuts, itself a troubling reminder of how the American people got into this mess.

The New York Times lead headline read: Bush Says Success Allows Gradual Troop Cuts. The Washington Post went with: Bush Tells Nation He Will Begin to Roll Back Surge.

In a subhead, the Post highlighted a tidbit from its own interview with Gen. David Petraeus, the U.S. commander in Iraq: that he projected sustainable security in that country by mid-2009 (which would fall shortly after the sixth anniversary of Bushs Mission Accomplished speech).

Granted, the news stories did include some reasons for skepticism about Bushs latest happy talk, including references to the assassination of the U.S.-allied Sheik Abdul Sattar Abu Risha earlier in the day in Anbar Province and the apparent collapse of Iraqi negotiations over how to divvy up the countrys oil revenues.

Yet, despite Bushs long history of wishful thinking or delusions about Iraq, the major newspapers still gave Bush the headlines he wanted.

So, Americans bustling past newsstands on their way to work would get the superficial impression that Bush was finally moving toward the Iraq exit door when he really was doing all he could to paint the country, and his presidential successor, into a corner.

more...

http://www.consortiumnews.com/2007/091407.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EST Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-14-07 09:57 AM
Response to Original message
1. Had the papers included only one or two words in those headlines,
they would have not only reflected the truth, they would have also reflected the majority attitude of the perennially slow learning American electorate.

The words? Begin each headline with "The Mendacious,"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Dec 18th 2017, 06:07 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC