Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Senate Blocks Mandatory ID Implants In Employees

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Nomad559 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-31-07 11:53 AM
Original message
Senate Blocks Mandatory ID Implants In Employees
http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-scan31aug31,0,2715647.story

Tackling a dilemma right out of a science fiction novel, the state Senate passed legislation Thursday that would bar employers from requiring workers to have identification devices implanted under their skin.

State Sen. Joe Simitian (D-Palo Alto) proposed the measure after at least one company began marketing radio frequency identification devices for use in humans.

The devices, as small as a grain of rice, can be used by employers to identify workers. A scanner passing over a body part implanted with one can instantly identify the person.

"RFID is a minor miracle, with all sorts of good uses," Simitian said. "But we shouldn't condone forced 'tagging' of humans. It's the ultimate invasion of privacy."

Simitian said he fears that the devices could be compromised by persons with unauthorized scanners, facilitating identity theft and improper tracking and surveillance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Xipe Totec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-31-07 11:55 AM
Response to Original message
1. It's more than invasion of privacy,
it is assault.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Faux pas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-31-07 12:04 PM
Response to Original message
2. Insane! Wouldn't' t a tattoo on the forehead work just as well?
:sarcasm: Big Brother, get away from me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-31-07 12:32 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Or Forearm, ala Nazi
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-31-07 01:31 PM
Response to Original message
4. Joe Simitian needs to be FIRED!
Edited on Fri Aug-31-07 01:37 PM by Joanne98
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
silverweb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-31-07 07:32 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Actually, Simitian needs to be thanked.
He's the one who proposed banning mandatory chipping, as opposed to California state reTHUG Bob Margett (R) and eight others who opposed banning it.

This is only a California bill but it needs to be federal, as at least one company, "CityWatcher.com, a Cincinnati video surveillance company, has required employees who work in its secure data center to have a microchip implanted in an arm."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Prophet 451 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-31-07 09:26 PM
Response to Original message
6. Meant to appeal to the Left Behind crowd
Has anyone actually PROPOSED requiring their employees be chipped? Is anyone likely to do so? Since an implanted chip is a very common feature of the theories of the Left Behind crowd (Mark of The Beast, Book of Revelation, etc), this strikes me as pandering.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oldenuff Donating Member (442 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-31-07 09:34 PM
Response to Original message
7. "Chipping" should be banned in every state.

Except perhaps for rogue ex-presidents.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AX10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-31-07 10:08 PM
Response to Original message
8. SEIG HEIL!
:puke: :argh: :mad::puke: :argh: :mad::puke: :argh: :mad::puke: :argh: :mad::puke: :argh: :mad::puke: :argh: :mad::puke: :argh: :mad::puke: :argh: :mad::puke: :argh: :mad::puke: :argh: :mad::puke: :argh: :mad::puke: :argh: :mad::puke: :argh: :mad::puke: :argh: :mad::puke: :argh: :mad::puke: :argh: :mad::puke: :argh: :mad::puke: :argh: :mad::puke: :argh: :mad::puke: :argh: :mad::puke: :argh: :mad::puke: :argh: :mad::puke: :argh: :mad::puke: :argh: :mad::puke: :argh: :mad::puke: :argh: :mad::puke: :argh: :mad::puke: :argh: :mad::puke: :argh: :mad::puke: :argh: :mad::puke: :argh: :mad::puke: :argh: :mad::puke: :argh: :mad::puke: :argh: :mad::puke: :argh: :mad::puke: :argh: :mad::puke: :argh: :mad::puke: :argh: :mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tom_paine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-01-07 09:59 AM
Response to Original message
9. Wow, how long before the Bushie "Court" legalizes this
If the company is smart, they will appeal.

Scalito and Slappy Thomas will LOOOOVE this idea.

Love it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 01:00 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC