Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why I'm Leaving The L.A. Times / Nancy Cleeland

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-29-07 08:49 AM
Original message
Why I'm Leaving The L.A. Times / Nancy Cleeland
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/nancy-cleeland-/why-im-leaving-the-l_b_49697.html


After 10 years, hundreds of bylines and some of the best experiences of my professional life, I'm leaving the Los Angeles Times at the end of this month, along with 56 newsroom colleagues. We each have our reasons for taking the latest buyout offer from Chicago-based Tribune Company. In my case, the decision grew out of frustration with the paper's coverage of working people and organized labor, and a sad realization that the situation won't change anytime soon...There may be no better setting in which to examine the issue: The Los Angeles region is defined by gaping income disparities and an enormous pool of low-wage immigrant workers, many of whom are pulled north by lousy, unstable jobs. It's also home to one of the most active and creative labor federations in the country. But you wouldn't know any of that from reading a typical issue of the L.A. Times, in print or online. Increasingly anti-union in its editorial policy, and celebrity -- and crime-focused in its news coverage, it ignores the economic discontent that is clearly reflected in ethnic publications such as La Opinion.... Here's one idea: Instead of hiring a "celebrity justice reporter," now being sought for the Times website, why not develop a beat on economic justice? It might interest some of the millions of workers who draw hourly wages and are being squeezed by soaring rents, health care costs and debt loads.

In Los Angeles, the underground economy is growing faster than the legitimate one, which means more exploited workers, greater economic polarization, and a diminishing quality of life for everyone who lives here. True, it's harder to capture those kinds of stories than to scan divorce files and lawsuits. But over time, solid reporting on the economic life of Los Angeles could bring distinction and credibility to the Times. It also holds tremendous potential for interacting with readers. And, above all, it's important...In a way, the Times created my obsession for economic and class issues by sending me into low-wage Los Angeles as part of a 1998 initiative to increase coverage of Latinos. I was a seasoned journalist with lots of experience in Third World countries. Still, the level of exploitation I saw shocked me. Illegal immigrants, in particular, had no rights. In a range of industries, including manufacturing and retail, they were routinely underpaid and fired after any attempt to assert rights or ask for higher wages. That disregard for workers spread up the chain of regional jobs, just as a crash in subprime home loans eventually lowers the entire real estate market. The same is happening to various degrees across the country.

Rather than reverse those troubling trends, recent political leaders have done just the opposite. Enabled by a Milton Friedman-inspired belief in free markets and the idea that poverty is proof of personal failure, not systemic failure, federal trade and regulatory policies have consistently undermined workers. The inequities worsened under President George W. Bush, who wears his antipathy toward labor on his sleeve. But few alarms were sounded by the mainstream press, including the Los Angeles Times.

In the easy vernacular of modern journalism, the Times and other newspapers routinely cast business and labor as powerful competitors whose rivalries occasionally flare up in strikes and organizing campaigns. What I saw was that workers almost always lose. Eventually I left the labor beat and wrote about education and housing. Even there, however, I noted a lack of enthusiasm for anything having to do with the region's working poor...I couldn't stop seeing them. I remembered the workers who killed chickens, made bagged salads, packed frozen seafood, installed closet organizers, picked through recycled garbage, and manufactured foam cups and containers. They were injured from working too fast, fired for speaking up, powerless, invisible. I saw that their impact on all of us who live in the region is huge.






Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DBoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-29-07 09:02 AM
Response to Original message
1. knr
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeyondGeography Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-29-07 09:08 AM
Response to Original message
2. Celebrity Justice Reporter
what a fucking prison we've built for ourselves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-29-07 09:50 AM
Response to Original message
3. And this will be the beginning of blog newspapers.
I don't, exactly, know how they'll make a living, but, imagine if conscientious newsreporters united and started competing newspapers in every major city in this country, only on the blogs. They already have a start, really. All those dailies and weekly magazines that print real local news already have blogs too. So, figure out a way to get local subscriptions and you get revenue. I suggest you start with the wanted pages. Start blogs with good wanted pages and the local people with come in droves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-29-07 06:46 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. Subscriptions are a relatively minor part of a newspaper's revenue
stream. Advertising is a much larger component. I think the answer lies in very cheap online subscriptions plus advertising of some sort.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-29-07 12:37 PM
Response to Original message
4. Nancy is an excellent writer.
And, I agree with her assessment of the situation. I stopped buying the Los Angeles Times, and the San Diego Union-Tribune long ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LibDemAlways Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-29-07 01:25 PM
Response to Original message
5. The working poor in Los Angeles aren't the demographic
the Times is interested in. It's all about ads for fancy watches and expensive condos. Since the paper was bought by the Tribune Co., it's degenerated into a rag that props up the chimp and buries real news on the back pages. I gave up my subscription back in 2000 when it paired a piece relentlessly slamming Hillary with a puff portrait of Laura Bush. My parents still get it, and I'm appalled that the Sunday editorial section is now part of the book review pages and the whole thing has been dumbed down into oblivion. Not fit to line a bird cage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cyberpj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-30-07 08:37 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. ..."the whole thing has been dumbed down"...
Exactly what's happening in every newspaper in the country. Here, in my small state of Delaware, our state newspaper was taken over by Gannett some time ago. Since then, any world or national news comes right off the AP printer without comment. Local news has a decidedly conservative slant along with the 'our say' editorials. Ads outweigh news and infotainment plays a disproportionate role. Perhaps the end result will be the death of smaller newspapers, just another consolidation and monopoly scheme for the giant media corporations killing everything in their path.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurovski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-29-07 05:46 PM
Response to Original message
6. K&R. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-29-07 10:15 PM
Response to Original message
8. LA Times is a piece of trash ~ no Sheer , no more me
Edited on Tue May-29-07 10:16 PM by goclark
I don't miss reading it one bit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 10:37 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC