Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

No matter what Iran agrees to, Bush regime wants war

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Mr_Jefferson_24 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-02-06 11:43 PM
Original message
No matter what Iran agrees to, Bush regime wants war
By Mike Whitney
Online Journal Contributing Writer

http://onlinejournal.com/artman/publish/article_864.shtml

<snip>

In a recent article in Counterpunch, “Embedded Journalism and the Disinformation Campaign for War on Iran,” Gary Leupp notes that the same cadres of neocons who misled the nation into war with Iraq have been reassembled in the Pentagon to repeat their success against Iran. Under the rubric of “The Office of Iranian Affairs,” Abram Shulsky, Elizabeth Cheney and other far-right hawks fill out a roster of pro-war advocates. Their task is to prepare the country for war by generating fear and suspicion of Iran’s imaginary weapons programs. The group's influence is probably similar to that of Judith Miller who was allowed to spout her bogus claims about Iraqi WMD from headlines across the country. In this case, however, the intention is to omit the critical facts about Iran’s activities rather than simply inventing false allegations.

For example, the media invariably excludes the important details about Iran’s programs that would allow American’s to form an educated opinion. These are:

1 The IAEA has consistently said that there is “no evidence” that Iran has a nuclear weapons program or is diverting nuclear material from its research.

2 Iran has been in full compliance with all its treaty obligations for three years and has undergone the most intensive inspection regime in the history of the IAEA.

3 The UN Security Council reaffirmed Iran’s “inalienable right” to develop nuclear energy for peaceful purposes and did not order Iran to suspend nuclear enrichment as was falsely reported in the news.

4 The United States has violated its obligations under the NPT by developing a new regime of “bunker busting” low yield nuclear weapons.

5 That the United States is violating the UN Charter by unilaterally threatening a sovereign nation that is not in breach of any UN resolution.

These are the fundamental facts that the American people need to know to make an informed judgment about the present confrontation. Instead, the media simply reiterates the specious claims of government officials without regard to either international law (NPT) or the findings of the UN watchdog agency, the IAEA. We must assume that the media is working with high-ranking officials in The Office of Iranian Affairs to produce news that is so obviously skewed in favor of the administration. After all, their entire raison d’etre is to create the rationale for moving the country to war...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Prisoner_Number_Six Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-02-06 11:49 PM
Response to Original message
1. I'm sorry- which "success" are they referring to??????
"reassembled in the Pentagon to repeat their success against Iran."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
driver8 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-02-06 11:50 PM
Response to Original message
2. "...repeat their success against Iran"?
What f*cking success??

Good God, these freakin' war mongers have got to be stopped. They are not going to be happy until they start WWIII.

Get ready for the draft.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr_Jefferson_24 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-03-06 12:06 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. I'm guessing the "success"...
...the author refers to is the selling of the Iraq invasion via a compliant corporate media to the American public, and not the debacle that's since been made out of the occupation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
classysassy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-05-06 01:46 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. "Only the poor"
the rich must remain behind to plan strategy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doctor_J Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-05-06 01:58 PM
Response to Reply #2
10. Read carefully
it says their success was at talking the people into supporting the war. Hard to argue iwth that, since Smirk had a 132% approval rating right after shock & auuuuuuuugh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lindisfarne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-03-06 12:22 AM
Response to Original message
4. War generates money for Halliburton and like. End of explanation.nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
physioex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-03-06 01:11 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. True Enough.....
But with the conflict in Iraq, this country has become what Saddam warned about "paper tiger" and we are engaged in the mother of all battles. That aside, I think talk of war with Iran is just that. What army is going to fight this war?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joe_shmoe Donating Member (143 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-03-06 08:33 PM
Response to Original message
6. **Please sign this petition against military actin against Iran**

It is with grave concern that I observe the growing threat of a new U.S. war--this time against the people of Iran.

For a collection of articles and resources on this subject you can visit this link: http://reseaudesign.com/research/iran/iran_summery.html

I'm starting up a petition which I will be sending out to as many members of Congress as possible. I'm asking for help to get this signed by as many people, possible in the next month. Send it to as many people you can.

http://www.petitiononline.com/n0war1rn /
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe Bacon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-04-06 12:47 PM
Response to Original message
7. Is there anything we can do to stop them?
Honestly, is there ANYTHING that can be done to stop them? What can we do?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr_Jefferson_24 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-04-06 03:28 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Realistically, I don't know that...
...there is, Joe. I do think taking to the street in organized protest can be effective, and did at least postpone the invasion of Iraq. We need very large numbers willing to participate in a sustained effort. Also, calling and writing your House and Senate representatives can at least let them know where we stand. I wish I had better answers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 08:53 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC