Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Middle Class on the Precipice

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Tace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 06:02 AM
Original message
The Middle Class on the Precipice
Rising financial risks for American families

by Elizabeth Warren -- Harvard Magazine

During the past generation, the American middle-class family that once could count on hard work and fair play to keep itself financially secure has been transformed by economic risk and new realities. Now a pink slip, a bad diagnosis, or a disappearing spouse can reduce a family from solidly middle class to newly poor in a few months.

Middle-class families have been threatened on every front. Rocked by rising prices for essentials as men’s wages remained flat, both Dad and Mom have entered the workforce—a strategy that has left them working harder just to try to break even. Even with two paychecks, family finances are stretched so tightly that a very small misstep can leave them in crisis. As tough as life has become for married couples, single-parent families face even more financial obstacles in trying to carve out middle-class lives on a single paycheck. And at the same time that families are facing higher costs and increased risks, the old financial rules of credit have been rewritten by powerful corporate interests that see middle-class families as the spoils of political influence.

Raising Incomes the Two-Worker Way

In just one generation, millions of mothers have gone to work, transforming basic family economics. The typical middle-class household in the United States is no longer a one-earner family, with one parent in the workforce and one at home full-time. Instead, the majority of families with small children now have both parents rising at dawn to commute to jobs so they can both pull in paychecks.

Scholars, policymakers, and critics of all stripes have debated the social implications of these changes, but few have looked at their economic impact. Today the median income for a fully employed male is $41,670 per year (all numbers are inflation-adjusted to 2004 dollars)—nearly $800 less than his counterpart of a generation ago. The only real increase in wages for a family has come from the second paycheck earned by a working mother. With both adults in the workforce full-time, the family’s combined income is $73,770—a whopping 75 percent higher than the median household income in the early 1970s. But the gain in income has an overlooked side effect: family risk has risen as well. Today’s families have budgeted to the limits of their new two-paycheck status. As a result, they have lost the parachute they once had in times of financial setback—a back-up earner (usually Mom) who could go into the workforce if the primary earner got laid off or fell sick. This “added-worker effect” could buttress the safety net offered by unemployment insurance or disability insurance to help families weather bad times. But today, a disruption to family fortunes can no longer be made up with extra income from an otherwise-stay-at-home partner.

more

http://www.harvard-magazine.com/on-line/010682.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ClintonTyree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 06:20 AM
Response to Original message
1. Why are Republicans waging war on the nuclear family?
Why do Republicans want to lower wages, out-source jobs, cut social programs and force Mommy's into the work force? Why are they so anti-family?
All so they can cram a few more lobbyist dollars into their fat, bulging pockets and watch their stock portfolios grow.
Why is there no out-cry from the evanhellicals about this? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 06:27 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. This, From The Second Graf, Stands Out
... the old financial rules of credit have been rewritten by powerful corporate interests that see middle-class families as the spoils of political influence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 06:31 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. "as the spoils of political influence." sad, makes me feel so helpless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 06:28 AM
Response to Original message
3. "nearly $800 less than his counterpart of a generation ago."--whow, no
wonder I feel like I can never catch up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 06:29 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. and I read that our speading is out pacing and savings. That is really
scary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fasttense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 06:43 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. Yup, households are actually spending more than they bring in.
We currently have a negative savings rate for the average middle class family. America hasn't seen this poor of a savings rate since the Great Depression. For those who think the DOW is an indicator of the great economy, just remember how well the stock market was doing just before the Great Depression.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 06:32 AM
Response to Original message
6. this comment rings so true. I see it all around me.


......But today, a disruption to family fortunes can no longer be made up with extra income from an otherwise-stay-at-home partner.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 06:33 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 07:00 AM
Response to Original message
9. k & r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
teryang Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 07:09 AM
Response to Original message
10. 73,000 dollars?
What is this in 1970 dollars? I know I was making more money in 1990 than I am making now even though nominally it was one half this figure. My current income is less than half of what I was making just three years ago.

Where can you get health insurance for less than 2000 a year, I want to sign up. On the economy, a baby boomer pays at least a thousand a month for a good family medical plan.

Younger voters are blissfully unaware that the trend will utimately pick your bones clean. And what is the trend? The rich and corporations don't pay taxes anymore, only the middle class and working Americans do. The tax structure strips wealth from working people and transfers it to the corporate rich. The legal structure transfers all risk from the entrepreneur to working people. Socialism for the rich, laizzez faire capitalism for working people. You're on your own pal. Have fun competing with Asian labor forces. Crony capitalists don't take risks.

Watch out, the terrorists are out to get us!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 08:19 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC