Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

W.'s Head in the Sand By Maureen Dowd

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-03-05 11:12 PM
Original message
W.'s Head in the Sand By Maureen Dowd



... At the Naval Academy, President Bush talked about how well the Iraqi security forces were fighting. He claimed that 40 Iraqi battalions were taking the lead in the fight against insurgents, and that in the battle of Tal Afar this year, "the assault was primarily led by Iraqi security forces - 11 Iraqi battalions backed by 5 coalition battalions providing support."

Anderson Cooper of CNN swiftly produced Time's Baghdad bureau chief, Michael Ware, who was embedded with the US military during the entire Tal Afar battle. "With the greatest respect to the president, that's completely wrong," Mr. Ware said, adding: "I was with Iraqi units right there on the front line as they were battling with al Qaeda. They were not leading."

He also told Mr. Cooper: "I have had a very senior officer here in Baghdad say to me that there's never going to be a point where these guys will be able to stand up against the insurgency on their own."

Mr. Ware recalled that in a battle two weeks ago, he saw an Iraqi security officer put down his weapon and curl up into a ball when he was under attack. "I have seen that on - on many, many occasions," he said........


http://select.nytimes.com/gst/tsc.html?URI=http://select.nytimes.com/2005/12/03/opinion/03dowd.html&OQ=nQ3DTopQ252fOpinionQ252fEditorialsQ2520andQ2520OpQ252dEdQ252fOpQ252dEdQ252fColumnistsQ252fMaureenQ2520Dowd&OP=44de4285Q2FQ3AuIEQ3AwZdccwQ3AQ2BQ2FQ2FhQ3AQ5CQ2BQ3AQ2FFQ3AcfQ5EQ7EQ5EcQ7EQ3AQ2FFQ3BcuQ3BkQ26w68

> W.'s Head in the Sand
> By Maureen Dowd
> The New York Times
>
> Saturday 03 December 2005

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
necso Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-03-05 11:14 PM
Response to Original message
1. Free link.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
occuserpens Donating Member (836 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-03-05 11:16 PM
Response to Original message
2. Dowd is wrong as usual
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
drdtroit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-03-05 11:24 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. You're right,
She called GWB the President, go figure?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WhiteTara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-04-05 12:43 AM
Response to Reply #2
7. she nails "free speech"
Guess the Bush administration didn't learn anything this fall when federal auditors said it had violated the law by buying favorable news coverage of its education polices. Bush officials got right back into the fake news business, paying to plant propaganda in the Iraqi press. They outsourced this disinformation campaign to something called the Lincoln Group - have they no shame?

You have to admire Scott McClellan, the president's spokesman. He kept a straight face when he called the U.S. "a leader when it comes to promoting and advocating a free and independent media around the world." He added, "We've made our views very clear when it comes to freedom of the press."

Exceedingly clear. The Bushies don't believe in it. They disdain the whole democratic system of checks and balances.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GrumpyGreg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-03-05 11:24 PM
Response to Original message
4. Can't read Dowd---she's so flakey she gives me a headache.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-03-05 11:26 PM
Response to Original message
5. Iraqis curl up in balls when asked to defend their country
And why are we there? The Iraqis are not ready to defend themselves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kindigger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-03-05 11:56 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Instead of permanent bases
maybe we should be building mental health clinics. Of course, there's no reason why the Iraqis should be assuming the fetal position in battle. It's not like anyone has been bombing the sh*t out of their country and all.

But then there'd be the dilemma of putting them on medications. Are guns included in an "avoid driving or operating heavy machinery" warning? Oh yeah, I forgot "until you know how the drug affects you." It makes you feel like killing people? Good job dopes! :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CJCRANE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-04-05 07:04 AM
Response to Original message
8. BLUF*: Neocons want to stay in Iraq
The neocons don't ever want to leave Iraq.

Condi, Cheney and Rumsfeld have stated quite clearly that it's a "generational war". They want permanent access to no-bid reconstruction, military and logisitical contracts and oil concessions.

If they could they would prefer a news blackout on fatalities in Iraq and just leave the war simmering in the background for the next 20 years.

*Bottom Line Up Front.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 06:27 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC