|
I've seen other people making the same mistake recently. Here's the letter I just sent to that writer:
John Edwards wrote that he regretted his October 11, 2002 vote on the Iraq War Resolution, which he also co-sponsored (though he didn't mention that in the editorial).
You write "And he might also have asked himself why teams of UN weapons inspectors were unable to find any of the weapons that the neocons insisted were in Iraq. Furthermore, if Bush and the neocons knew where the weapons were…why didn’t they tell the inspectors? Apparently, this question was too abstract to enter the senator’s consciousness."
The weapons inspectors had been kicked out of Iraq since 1998. It was only in December, 2 months after the Iraq War Resolution passed, that they were re-admitted to Iraq. In March, they reported that they had not found any WMDs. At that point Bush apparently realized that the inspectors threatened to undermine his excuse for the war, so he ordered them out and launched the invasion.
Certainly, people could have asked why the inspectors weren't finding weapons, why Bush's people didn't tell them where they were, etc., beginning in December 2002. But myy question is, how could Senator Edwards or any other senator, in October 2002, have asked himself *anything* about what the inspectors had or hadn't found, when they hadn't been let back in yet? When, in fact, getting the inspectors back in was the reason given by many Democrats for their vote in favor of the IWR? I'm wondering whether you have the sequence of historical events out of order or whether there's another explanation for your statement.
|