Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

There is a cancer on the presidency (Seattle Post-Intelligencer)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
kurth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-05 02:06 AM
Original message
There is a cancer on the presidency (Seattle Post-Intelligencer)
Sunday, October 30, 2005
CIA Leak: Not above the law
SEATTLE POST-INTELLIGENCER EDITORIAL BOARD

There is a cancer on the presidency, and it cannot be exorcised by the resignation of I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby. Libby, assistant to the president and Vice President Dick Cheney's chief of staff, has been indicted on five federal counts, including obstruction of justice, making false statement and perjury. The charges stem from the investigation into a leak disclosing that Valerie Plame, wife of former ambassador Joseph Wilson, was a covert CIA operative.

Based on the allegations special prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald laid out in the indictments Friday, it's increasingly evident that officials within the Bush administration disclosed Plame's identity as part of an effort to discredit Wilson's criticism of one of the pretexts for war against Iraq.

Fitzgerald said that the investigation remained open, and the indictments make intriguing reference to the conversation another senior White House official, identified only as "Official A," had with columnist Robert Novak in which Wilson's wife was "discussed as a CIA employee." No matter where the investigation goes from here, the question is why President Bush didn't fire Libby long ago if his role in outing Plame was as clear as the indictments indicate. It raises the uncomfortable and inevitable question: What did the president know and when did he know it?

The larger, more important context goes beyond palace intrigue: the lengths to which the Bush administration was willing to go to protect its trumped-up justifications for an unjustifiable war.

http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/opinion/246325_scootered.asp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
lebkuchen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-05 02:17 AM
Response to Original message
1. There's an interesting on-line poll at the end of that op-ed
A vast majority of voters think both Bush and Cheney were involved in the outing of Plame.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-05 04:30 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. 71.4 say both Bush and Cheney involved. 6.1 says neither.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hippiegranny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-05 01:31 PM
Response to Reply #1
14. Yes, I thought that was interesting too...
... and even more interesting is this: who are the 4% who claim "it doesn't matter." ??? It doesn't matter? Now those are some serious kool-aid drinkers, even more so than the ones who voted "neither."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-05 02:21 AM
Response to Original message
2. Like the tie in to the entire Crime Family
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lebkuchen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-05 02:24 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. This question indicts the Bush WH.
No matter where the investigation goes from here, the question is why President Bush didn't fire Libby long ago if his role in outing Plame was as clear as the indictments indicate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-05 02:43 AM
Response to Original message
4. It's finally getting to the unjustified Iraqi war
and the insanity of it all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spinzonner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-05 05:30 AM
Response to Original message
6. This Presidency IS a cancer

on the country
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
texpatriot2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-05 08:21 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Yes indeed. n.t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indepat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-05 09:16 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. I was going to say this Presidency is a cancer, but you beat me to the
punch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rndmprsn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-05 02:12 PM
Response to Reply #6
15. AMEN!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ktowntennesseedem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-05 03:08 PM
Response to Reply #6
17. And a cancer of the rectum, at that.
The whole lot of them, one royal pain in the ass.

:hurts:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberty Belle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-05 11:42 AM
Response to Original message
9. kicked and nominating. Great editorial.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bernardo de La Paz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-05 12:45 PM
Response to Original message
10. Calling it like it is!
"The larger, more important context goes beyond palace intrigue: the lengths to which the Bush administration was willing to go to protect its trumped-up justifications for an unjustifiable war."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ninkasi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-05 12:51 PM
Response to Original message
11. Excellent editorial
I hope this is just the start of exposing the entire corrupt administration for what they are...money grubbing war mongers, intent on seizing power and keeping it. I hope that even some of their base will begin to see the light. Nominated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Botany Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-05 12:59 PM
Response to Original message
12. 1 word
Hospice

the cancer is too advanced ..... bush is toast!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yy4me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-05 01:02 PM
Response to Original message
13. Anyone with half an ounce of brains knew this ages ago,
so...what took so long? I quess I am just so anxious for this to progress, I forget that there has to be a certain procedure to follow. I hope I live long enough to see this gang swing in the wind.
Grrrrrr.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bahrbearian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-05 02:26 PM
Response to Original message
16. Poll is being Freeped
54% Both 27% Neither
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stevedeshazer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-05 04:50 PM
Response to Original message
18. Young people, please take note
When the Executive Branch loses all credibility, the government ceases. Period. Frozen dreams.

All their (*Bushco) plans are halted because of this investigation. It's like when your toilet plugs up. It stinks, and nothing happens until someone has the courage to break out the plunger and use it. That's what the smell is right now.

If it overflows, your neighbors srart to notice, and they're not happy.

Rove, and all the attendant stench and hubris that He, the Lionized One, brings to bear, are a cancer on the presidency.

This enormous scandal will overflow the toilet of government just as surely as anything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-05 06:09 PM
Response to Original message
19. Wasn't this an expression used during the Watergate era?
A Cancer on the Presidency

Sounds vaguely familiar
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Elidor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 07:15 AM
Response to Reply #19
21. Yeah, John Dean coined it on one of the Nixon tapes
Ironically, he was part of it at the time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Independent_Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-05 11:12 PM
Response to Original message
20. "a cancer on the presidency"...
Edited on Sun Oct-30-05 11:15 PM by Independent_Liberal
That sounds awfully familiar.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mcscajun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 08:58 AM
Response to Reply #20
22. It certainly ought to...
Edited on Mon Oct-31-05 08:59 AM by mcscajun
It's what John Dean said to Nixon about the Watergate Scandal.

He told Nixon that unless he came clean about the entire affair, it would bring down his presidency. Nixon didn't...and it did.

It's with no irony that the Seattle Post-Intelligencer column uses this headline.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 01:40 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC