You Call This Normal? The New York Times in Falluja

[chlamor]

Seattle, Washington, April 18, 2005


"Things are almost back to normal here. We have teachers and books. Things are getting better."

New York Times 3-26-05 "Vital Signs of a Ruined City Grow stronger in Falluja"

"I knew that I could never again raise my voice against the violence of the oppressed in the ghettos without having first spoken clearly to the greatest purveyor of violence in the world today "my own government."

Rev. Martin Luther King

Cameras aren't allowed in Falluja; neither are journalists. If they were then we would have first-hand proof of America's greatest war crime in the last 30 years; the Dresden-like bombardment of an entire city of 250,000. Instead, we have to rely on eyewitness accounts that appear on the internet or the spurious reports that sporadically surface in the New York Times and Associated Press. For the most part, the Times and AP have shown themselves to be undependable; limiting their coverage to the details that support the overall goals of the occupation. For example, in the last few weeks both the NYTs and the AP ran stories on the alleged progress being made in Falluja. The AP outrageously referred to the battered city as "the safest place in Iraq"; a cynical appraisal of what most independent journalists have called nearly total destruction. One can only wonder if the editors at the AP would approve of similar security measures if they were taken in their own neighborhoods.

The NYTs also ran a lengthy story, "Vital Signs of a Ruined City Grow stronger in Falluja", which portrayed Falluja as a city on the mend' after a healthy dose of imperial medicine: "Classes have started again two months ago and the cheerful shrieks of children can be heard in the hallways." This was just one of the more contemptuous quotes lifted from the NYT's story of "rebirth" from the epicenter of American devastation. The quote was accompanied by a picture of a Marine in full-combat gear bending over to tie the shoe of a seven or eight year old Iraqi boy; a threatening image used to convey the spirit of American generosity.

The truth about Falluja is far different than the bogus reports in the AP and Times. The fact that even now, a full 6 months after the siege, camera crews and journalists are banned from the city, tells us a great deal about the extent of America's war crimes. Just two weeks ago, a photographer from Al Aribiyya news was arrested while leaving Falluja and his equipment and film were confiscated. To date, he is still being held without explanation and there is no indication when he will be released. This illustrates the fear among the military brass that the truth about Falluja will leech out and destroy whatever modest support still exists for the occupation. Journalists should realize that Falluja may turn out to be the administration's Achilles heel; a My Lai-type atrocity that turns the public decisively against Bush's war.


The incoming address of this article is :
   www.counterpunch.org/whitney04182005.html

[Judi Lynn]

1. Saw a reporter from the N.T. Times for a moment on tv Sunday

only long enough to hear him claim that it's business as usual in Baghdad, everything is completely normal, and I understood I was looking at a _Bush paid journalist.

I turned to my husband and told him I thought the N.Y. Times would be more subtle now that Judi Miller had been outed. Apparently not.
They're trying to influence the greatest number possible and to hell with those of us who know what they're doing.

This is an EXCELLENT article. Thanks.

[LibertyorDeath]

2. WTF is going on in that pic

The NYT can try & white wash it but the World knows what America did to the City & Citizens of Falluja.

[Moderator]

3. Please post warning in the subject line, when including 'graphic' content

It's generally considered a kindness to warn people when an article shows something that might be seen as... well, gruesome. Please include a note or warning in the future.

Thank you,
DU Moderator