Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

C.I.A. Chief Seeks Change in Inspector's 9/11 Report -NYT

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-01-04 10:21 PM
Original message
C.I.A. Chief Seeks Change in Inspector's 9/11 Report -NYT
Edited on Mon Nov-01-04 10:22 PM by party_line
WASHINGTON, Nov. 1 - The director of central intelligence has asked the C.I.A.'s inspector general to modify a draft report on the Sept. 11 attacks to avoid drawing conclusions about whether individual C.I.A. officers should be held accountable for any failures, Congressional and intelligence officials said Monday.

The request by Porter J. Goss, the intelligence chief, would affect an 800-page report that is the result of nearly two years of work. Congressional officials said they were reviewing Mr. Goss's request, spelled out in an Oct. 27 memorandum to the inspector general, John Helgerson, to determine whether it was consistent with a request by the joint Congressional committee that looked into the Sept. 11 attacks.

That panel asked in December 2002 that the Central Intelligence Agency's inspector general determine "whether and to what extent personnel at all levels should be held accountable" for any mistakes that contributed to the failure to disrupt the attacks. Mr. Helgerson's draft report is widely understood to identify officers and officials who should be considered for discipline because of breakdowns in the collection, analysis and distribution of intelligence before the attacks.

The draft report was completed in July, but it has not yet been shared with the individuals named in the document. That step has been delayed for the last 90 days to allow time for Mr. Goss, who took office in September, and his predecessor, John E. McLaughlin, to review the document. In recent weeks, members of Congress, both Democrats and Republicans, have complained to Mr. Goss about the delay. The disclosure of the request from Mr. Goss represents the first indication of how he intends to approach the issue.

http://www.nytimes.com/2004/11/02/politics/02intel.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-01-04 10:23 PM
Response to Original message
1. this is horse shit....I want the un-redacted portion that tells me who was
and is responsible
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VegasWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-01-04 10:24 PM
Response to Original message
2. Goss just didn't like the parts about Cheney. n/t
\
New Information Shows Bush Indecisive, Paranoid, Delusional
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-01-04 10:26 PM
Response to Original message
3. All Gross has done since being appointed is CYA for bushco
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
clydefrand Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-01-04 10:30 PM
Response to Original message
4. Can/will Kerry recommend a new CIA director?
Must he keep the newly approved one?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Disturbed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-01-04 10:59 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Kerry can get rid of Goss.
If he doesn't I will be stunned. Goss is a Right Ring Asshole!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bozos for Bush Donating Member (821 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-01-04 11:04 PM
Response to Original message
6. Hey Goss, enjoy that temp job!
Come January, Kerry will send Donald Trump over with the news...

You're fired!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-01-04 11:07 PM
Response to Original message
7. Get these people out NOW!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-01-04 11:10 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. no fooling, if Goss was appointed...this would probably already be public
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AngryWhiteLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-01-04 11:45 PM
Response to Original message
9. Democrats like Jane Harmon and others who confirmed Goss can't bitch
If Jane Harmon and the other Dems on the House Intelligence Committee had ANY BALLS AND STOOD UP AGAINST GOSS' CONFIRMATION, then we wouldn't be having this problem...

What did they expect from Goss? You vote to appoint a snake, you're likely to get bit.

JB
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sliverofhope Donating Member (858 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-02-04 02:03 AM
Response to Original message
10. The coverup begins if we let it
We must not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-02-04 02:09 AM
Response to Original message
11. On the one hand, drafts are just that...
drafts intended to be modified, corrected, honed, nailed down.

On the other hand, we have Porter Goss. 'Nuff said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 02:48 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC