Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

How the White House Embraced Disputed Arms Intelligence (NY Times)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Paragon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-02-04 11:18 PM
Original message
How the White House Embraced Disputed Arms Intelligence (NY Times)
http://www.nytimes.com/2004/10/03/international/middleeast/03tube.html?ex=1254456000&en=e1cdc9abb66e0336&ei=5089&partner=rssyahoo

In 2002, at a crucial juncture on the path to war, senior members of the Bush administration gave a series of speeches and interviews in which they asserted that Saddam Hussein was rebuilding his nuclear weapons program. Speaking to a group of Wyoming Republicans in September, Vice President Dick Cheney said the United States now had "irrefutable evidence" - thousands of tubes made of high-strength aluminum, tubes that the Bush administration said were destined for clandestine Iraqi uranium centrifuges, before some were seized at the behest of the United States.

Those tubes became a critical exhibit in the administration's brief against Iraq. As the only physical evidence the United States could brandish of Mr. Hussein's revived nuclear ambitions, they gave credibility to the apocalyptic imagery invoked by President Bush and his advisers. The tubes were "only really suited for nuclear weapons programs," Condoleezza Rice, the president's national security adviser, explained on CNN on Sept. 8, 2002. "We don't want the smoking gun to be a mushroom cloud."

But almost a year before, Ms. Rice's staff had been told that the government's foremost nuclear experts seriously doubted that the tubes were for nuclear weapons, according to four officials at the Central Intelligence Agency and two senior administration officials, all of whom spoke on condition of anonymity. The experts, at the Energy Department, believed the tubes were likely intended for small artillery rockets.

The White House, though, embraced the disputed theory that the tubes were for nuclear centrifuges, an idea first championed in April 2001 by a junior analyst at the C.I.A. Senior nuclear scientists considered that notion implausible, yet in the months after 9/11, as the administration built a case for confronting Iraq, the centrifuge theory gained currency as it rose to the top of the government...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
KC21304 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-02-04 11:22 PM
Response to Original message
1. If Kerry doesn't start saying Bush is LYING when he
says Kerry saw the same intelligence Bush did, I am going to explode.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Leilani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-02-04 11:36 PM
Response to Original message
2. Oops, I think the CIA is still pissed off!
Too bad the liars were not challenged before the war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-03-04 01:26 AM
Response to Original message
3. kick for speaking with forked tongue
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
expatriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-03-04 01:29 AM
Response to Original message
4. your movie sig rocks! the hatchbacks in the background add to it
Edited on Sun Oct-03-04 01:30 AM by expatriot
as for this article, wow. it is a lot of pages. I will have to read it tomorrow with one of my Ritalins.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daleo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-03-04 01:34 AM
Response to Original message
5. This should be big - proves they were lying war mongers
Rice just ignores her experts and makes any old claim that suits her, to push the war agenda. Well, it's one more drip of water anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moderator DU Moderator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-03-04 05:25 AM
Response to Original message
6. Duplicate
This is the same article as this:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=102&topic_id=879433

The NY Times changed the headline.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 06:09 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC