Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Judge Orders Ends to Miami Trucker Strike

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Khephra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-11-04 08:40 AM
Original message
Judge Orders Ends to Miami Trucker Strike
MIAMI -- A federal judge has ordered an end to a two-week strike by 700 independent truckers at the Port of Miami-Dade, but the drivers vowed to continue their work stoppage.

U.S. District Judge Patricia A. Seitz issued a temporary restraining order Friday, saying the port, Miami-Dade County and a private terminal operator at the port would suffer "immediate and irreparable injury, loss or damage" unless the striking truck drivers were forced to stop the boycott.

"We are not going back to work until our demands are met," striking driver Eladio Marin said.

snip....

The drivers are seeking higher wages, saying that long waits at the port make their $50-a-load payment insufficient. They also say they should not be required to pay for liability insurance, which is deducted from their paychecks.

http://www.newsday.com/business/nationworld/wire/sns-ap-trucker-strike-florida,0,7539435.story?coll=sns-ap-business-headlines
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
brainshrub Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-11-04 08:44 AM
Response to Original message
1. Go truckers! Go Union!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nevernose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-11-04 08:56 AM
Response to Original message
2. immediate and irreparable injury, loss or damage
Well, that's the whole freaking POINT of a strike isn't it? To hurt the other guy until they give you what you want?

"Universal Maritime Services ... said it has lost 95 percent of its business, at a cost of about $700,000, because truckers weren't entering the port to pick up or deliver cargo."

It goes on to say that as independant contractors who are not union members, they are violating anti-trust laws by conspiring to restrict trade. This may be legally correct, I don't know, I'm not a lawyer, but it sounds right to me. Still bullshit, though, as it is in no way morally correct.

Besides, the court can order anything it wants, there's no way in hell you can force 1,000 angry truckers to do anything, much less go to work.

I wonder if these guys are going to rethink their opinion of unions?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mbperrin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-11-04 09:00 AM
Response to Original message
3. Get a union! "Independent" means isolated and
alone, and that sounds like a target to me!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 12:48 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC