Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

List Linking Smoking to Diseases Expands

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
demdave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-28-04 12:19 AM
Original message
List Linking Smoking to Diseases Expands

WASHINGTON (AP) - The list of diseases linked to smoking grew longer Thursday. Add acute myeloid leukemia, cancers of the cervix, kidney, pancreas and stomach, abdominal aortic aneurysms, cataracts, periodontitis and pneumonia.

"We've known for decades that smoking is bad for your health, but this report shows that it's even worse," said Surgeon General Richard Carmona, announcing his first official assessment of the effects of tobacco.

The report said current evidence is not conclusive enough to say smoking causes colorectal cancer, liver cancer, prostate cancer or erectile disfunction. Some research has associated those diseases with smoking, but Carmona said more proof is needed.

The evidence suggests smoking may not cause breast cancer in women but that some women, depending on genetics, may increase their risk of getting it by smoking, the report said.


Note: I like this phrase the best....The report said current evidence is not conclusive enough to say smoking causes colorectal cancer, liver cancer, prostate cancer or erectile disfunction. Some research has associated those diseases with smoking, but Carmona said more proof is needed.

I am sick of all this smoke screen. Either ban smoking or admit that the idiots that do it know damn well what they are doing and accept the consequences. If it is that bad, stop making money off of the pain and death of others and BAN IT.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
shraby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-28-04 12:26 AM
Response to Original message
1. Another case of poor science for headlines.
I've seen a lot of announcements like this but they are never backed up by creditable scientific studies with significant numbers of subjects.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theivoryqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-28-04 12:28 AM
Response to Original message
2. truth in advertising: am smoking now
but read this anyway. Every day I fall asleep vowing to be stronger and to never smoke again and wake up encouraged. Almost every night I end up lighting up. It's weirdly hard to quit. There are a lot of reasons to be a smoker - suicide mainly (statistics, not intent), but redirected anger and anxiety generally. I know - all the bad. But I thank you for your timely post. Maybe tonight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SlavesandBulldozers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-28-04 12:32 AM
Response to Original message
3. a Bill Hicks quote
"Non-smokers die. . . . everyday."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salvorhardin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-28-04 01:28 AM
Response to Original message
4. Radiation?
I would think that while cardiovascular and pulmonary diseases as well as perhaps cancer of anything from the mouth through to the lungs are understandable, such a wide range of cancers across so many different body organs can not be attributed to just the tobacco smoke. Rather, this suggests that the amount of radiation from Polonium-210 in cigarettes is a great deal higher than one might expect.

The problem wouldn't stop with cigarettes though since the radiation comes from fertilizers made with phosphates derived from apatite rock. The apatite becomes radioactive because it traps radon gas. This would make much of our food supply a radiation hazard, although perhaps tobacco absorbs more of the radiation than fruits and vegetables do. Perhaps it's time to take a Geiger counter to the produce aisle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KT2000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-28-04 01:32 AM
Response to Original message
5. Smokescreen
Smoking is being used as a smokescreen for a lot of other products that are profitable for huge corporations, which happen to be direct descendants of the petroleum industry.

Tobacco is a heavily pesticided product. Some of the "new" cancers mentioned in this articles are also associated with pesticide exposure.

THis report is probably in response to a recent report from a Canadian Family Physicians Association that conducted a review of the literature to show links to disease from many different environmental exposures - pesticides (products that are produced with the sole intention of killing - for example through the central nervous system) were found do be the worst. Damage begins in utero; childhood cancers; learning disabilities (brain damage) etc.

Yeah - smoking is bad - but don't swallow the hype. Demand that all those chemicals you are forced to be exposed to, are fully tested. Most of them are NOT adequately tested.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KT2000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-28-04 02:40 AM
Response to Original message
6. And another thing -
This report is part of an initiative set up by the director of the CDC.

The proposed reorganization of the CDC is something we should all be watching. One development: It looks like NIOSH (National Institute of Occcupational Safety and Health) is being smothered.

Getit? No need to monitor, fine or improve workers health and safety - all diseases is caused by smoking.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 17th 2024, 08:55 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC