Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Teen overcome by fumes, dies at recycling plant

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Liberal_in_LA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-14-11 04:54 PM
Original message
Teen overcome by fumes, dies at recycling plant
Source: LA Times

Federal and state officials are investigating the death of a teenager who was overcome by fumes in a tunnel at a Kern County recycling plant where he worked.

Armando Ramirez, 16, was killed late Wednesday morning as he was cleaning the inside of a drain pipe. His brother, Eladio Ramirez, 22, was critically injured after trying to rescue him, said Kern County Fire Department Capt. Joaquin Gaeta.

----

The brothers were found unconscious about 7 feet down a shaft at the Community Recycling Center in Lamont, just southeast of Bakersfield, Gaeta said.

The tunnel tested positive for high levels of hydrogen sulfide, a gas released during composting that can damage the brain and central nervous system.

----------------

Gaeta said Armando used a fake I.D. to get work at the plant.

Read more: http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/lanow/2011/10/teen-overcome-by-fumes-dies-at-recycling-plant.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-14-11 04:58 PM
Response to Original message
1. OMG. That poor family. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KT2000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-14-11 05:19 PM
Response to Original message
2. They had asked for masks
that would protect them from the fumes but as is the common response - they were given only paper masks for dust.
This is the result of chemical company efforts to downplay and deny toxicity. It has created a laissez faire attitude regarding all exposures. People who want to protect themselves are said to have "chemophobia" a made up term to silence people.

Take a look at most manicure salons and you will see the women wearing paper dust masks. They are not being protected from the neurotoxic fumes they are exposed to all day. They will be very sick with neurological damage in their midlife.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truedelphi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-14-11 05:32 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. My mother died of Parkinson's
After she retired, she and a friend began a nail salon.

I was proud of her, but then when I realized how awful the fumes were, I tried to interest her in the type of equipment that would have helped protect her and the other worker, who was a close friend of hers.

The two women didn't want the expense involved, some four to six thousand bucks. (they could have afforded it, unlike some people of very low incomes who just don't have the money.)

Her friend started in with using that word regarding me. I was chemical-phobic.

Both of them would tell me that none of the products they were using were unsafe - after all, would our government allow unsafe chems to be bought over the counter?



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KT2000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-14-11 06:39 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. EEEEEK!! - exactly!
That is so sad. If they (the powers that be) would just allow decent education and a healthy respect for the damage that can ocur, so many would not be sick. I just don't get it.
I'm sorry about you mother. A dear friend had that and it is not a nice disease at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truedelphi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-15-11 03:13 PM
Response to Reply #10
20. What is even worse - there is now a new "outrageous" and glorious
Way of having your nails done - it involves an entire chemical procedure with special drying methods. I cannot even imagine the type of lacquer that this treatment involves and of course, Oprah's Magazine was promoting it.

It is more costly and time consuming than the previous methods.

And although the one article I read talks about the fumes being a bit heavier than in the conventional treatment - you are only doing the procedure for special events, so - SO WHAT! Suck it up, ladies to look even more glam.

And no mention in the article, that while the proud wearer of this treatment might have these fumes only once in a while, the workers will experience them every day.

There are times when I really detest fashion.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KT2000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-15-11 08:27 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. Here is one for you
A Washington State committee on indoor air quality once looked into the case of a woman who took her newborn into a nail salon while she had her nails done. That evening the baby started having seizures and was rushed to the emergency room. They measured high levels of the chemicals used in the nail salon in the baby's blood. The committee did not do anything with the knowledge they had - just let things go as they had been. The committee members were professors from the U of WA and doctors and someone to represent the public. She could not get them to take action.

I detest fashion too - don't even get me started on the SHOES!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmowreader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-11 08:14 PM
Response to Reply #2
26. The dust masks aren't to protect them from the fumes
It's for protection from airborne dusts--there is a LOT of it produced in various nail procedures.

The only thing that'll protect a nail tech from neurotoxic fumes is updraft ventilation, and lots of it--which the cheap nail salons can't afford.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elfin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-14-11 05:25 PM
Response to Original message
3. May have been temp workers - NO benefits
My son had a temp job during the last recession as a teen at a noxious fumes emitting facility for a short time - until his Dad and I ascertained the nature of his work there. He needed the $ -- but we needed him alive. Supposedly the business "passed" in that area. We did not trust the company. It took a while, but he found a safer job, which eventually led to full time employment.

This is horrific and a sad comment on the times

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sce56 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-14-11 05:42 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. When ever you hear of some one working at a place that has problems ask them what kind of training
On site safety are they getting that will usually trigger a reaction from the employer if it is a legit operation you'll get straight answers if not then they will let them go then you call OSHA and report them!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lunasun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-14-11 06:58 PM
Response to Reply #3
11. alot of times they' pass' becuz they get tipped off the EPA or OSHA is coming
and stop or slow down the really bad stuf as is the case where I worked years ago on 3rd shift.
Red emergency lights went off and the mangers came out and said we gotta clean up OSHA is coming in the morning!
The shift was stopped and everyone told to work on 'clean up' which was really 'hide it'
Forklifts came out of nowhere and went everywhere and moved everything around.
They covered up everything and took away others and the place looked and smelled completely different from the norm.
When I came back the next night it was back to bizness as usual....guess they came got the pass grade and could go back to toxic mess. You were right to not trust the company and are not chemophobic.

I got out after I saved enough money that I could and never had any health trouble but this is when you could also smoke @ work and wonder about the smokers or I guess anyone predisposed or working at those jobs a long time .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sce56 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-14-11 05:29 PM
Response to Original message
4. Clear violation of CalOSHA!
Edited on Fri Oct-14-11 05:36 PM by sce56
Un trained underage workers in a confined space with out proper PPE, no monitoring of air for combustibles/toxic air no confined space permit etc etc. And they complain the govt regulates too much this is why we have all of those regs to keep these events from happening!




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-11 11:51 PM
Response to Reply #4
29. Exactly
I was flashing back to HAZWOPR when I read the OP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeSwiss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-14-11 05:43 PM
Response to Original message
7. K&R n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lint Head Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-14-11 05:45 PM
Response to Original message
8. And the fucking GOP want to get rid of rhe EPA!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
24601 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-14-11 09:01 PM
Response to Reply #8
16. Last time I looked both the Federal Exec Branch and California
were bring run by Obama & Brown. Thanks for clarifying that they are GOP - and that Democrats have no responsibility or accountability here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sce56 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-15-11 10:02 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. Run by but the EPA & OSHA are funded by Congress and they are budget cutting those.
And they also were started by that liberal Nixon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doremus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-14-11 06:24 PM
Response to Original message
9. But, but, but I thought companies made sure there weren't any dangerous conditions for workers now.
I mean, the days of needing unions to help make workplaces safer are over, right? Rightwingers keep saying so!

:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scruffy1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-11 11:09 AM
Response to Reply #9
24. Someone should be convicted.
I am not a lawyer, but to me it looks like willful criminal negligence since the law was not followed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alp227 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-14-11 07:20 PM
Response to Original message
12. fake ID? Probably an illegal immigrant.
Geez, that's why employers need to use E-VERIFY and need to be held responsible for such negligence like this!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChandlerJr Donating Member (554 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-14-11 07:32 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Maybe it was just to get past the age requirement, and
SACRAMENTO—California has become the seventh state to prohibit credit checks in making employment decisions with legislation Gov. Jerry Brown signed into law.

Also this week, Gov. Brown signed into law another bill that prohibits federal E-Verify mandates in California.

http://www.businessinsurance.com/article/20111011/NEWS07/111019976#
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alp227 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-15-11 12:43 PM
Response to Reply #13
19. Why would a 16yo want to work there
Because Mcdonalds wasnt hiring?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lunasun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-11 06:28 PM
Response to Reply #19
25. thats the ticket the victim was the problem.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmowreader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-11 11:57 PM
Response to Reply #19
30. Or because it pays better than McDonalds
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
octothorpe Donating Member (358 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-15-11 10:37 AM
Response to Reply #12
18. Or age, since he was only 16...
E-Verify would have detected that thought, aye?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nomorenomore08 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-11 05:17 AM
Response to Reply #12
22. Yeah, with a name like Ramirez, he'd have to be, right???
:sarcasm:

Not that it would make any difference if he were. He would still deserve the same basic protections as any other worker.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scruffy1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-11 11:04 AM
Response to Reply #12
23. No human being is illegal.
I get so damn tired of the right wing "illegal alien" racists shit being remouthed by liberals. There are a whole lot of workers who don't have or can't get documentation. This does not make them criminals.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truthisfreedom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-14-11 07:38 PM
Response to Original message
14. Hydrogen sulfide?
Isn't that the gas that smells like rotten eggs? How could they even bear to be in there at all?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-14-11 08:02 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. You can't smell hydrogen sulfide at high concentrations.
It deadens the sense of smell.

It's also heavier than air, so it collects in low places.

This is a classic hydrogen sulfide accident.

The company was breaking the law in a number of ways.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wordpix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-11 11:20 PM
Response to Original message
27. "the company had no history of violations, but...had broken a few land use rules in the past."
Edited on Sun Oct-16-11 11:21 PM by wordpix
snip: Cal-OSHA spokeswoman Erik Monterroza said the company had no history of violations, but county officials told the Bakersfield Californian the plant had broken a few land use rules in the past.

:shrug: Breaking "a few" land use rules aren't violations? :grr:

If you break land use rules, you're breaking land use regs, and that is violating the regs. But let's not call the widdle company that just killed this teenager a violator of regs, just like we avoided that for BP when it had 100's of violations before the Horizon blowout.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burrowowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-11 11:38 PM
Response to Original message
28. Where in the hell is OSHA!?
Edited on Sun Oct-16-11 11:40 PM by burrowowl
What the hell! Safety regulations anyone!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 04:29 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC