Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Two never-finished Navy ships head to scrap heap

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Synicus Maximus Donating Member (828 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-11 09:08 PM
Original message
Two never-finished Navy ships head to scrap heap
Source: Pilotonline,com

They are the two ships no one wanted, almost constantly embroiled in one dispute or another for the past 25 years. The two Navy behemoths have never gone on a mission, were never even completed, yet they cost taxpayers at least $300 million.

Now the vessels, the Benjamin Isherwood and the Henry Eckford, are destined to leave Virginia waters for good and be scrapped at a Texas salvage yard, with no money coming back to the U.S. Treasury.

Read more: http://hamptonroads.com.nyud.net/2011/07/two-neverfinished-navy-ships-head-scrap-heap
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Kaleva Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-11 09:22 PM
Response to Original message
1. A case where a politician got a defense contract for a local company that couldn't do the work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmowreader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-11 11:42 PM
Response to Reply #1
16. More like a local company who went out of business
According to the article, the ships were laid down at the Pennsylvania Shipbuilding Company, which had been in business continuously since 1681. The yard went out of business in 1991, because of a lot of financial shenanigans pulled by its owners. It defaulted on this contract in 1991, and it looks like the reason is the ownership of Pennsylvania Shipbuilding was using the funds from the Navy contract to prop up another one of its shipyards rather than to build the Navy ships.

Here's an interesting legal brief on Pennsylvania Shipbuilding: http://www.paed.uscourts.gov/documents/opinions/02D0672P.pdf
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yon_Yonson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-11 09:33 PM
Response to Original message
2. Ah what the hell, the Navy does not need anymore ships becuse they have enough
... enough fire power to destroy the planet Earth ten times over. They have a whole frigging nuclear sub fleet to fight terrorist & drug wars, not to mention the surface fleet. It was a SEAL TEAM that got OBL not a nuclear sub. What a fucking waste of money!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laconicsax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-11 09:59 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. FWIW: The two ships in question were oilers, not warships.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yon_Yonson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-11 10:18 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. It's still a waste of tax dollars
The navy of the United States of America; is the agency that maintains and trains and equips combat-ready naval forces.

So be it a oil tanker, a river patrol boat, an aircraft carrier, a guided missile cruiser, a nuclear sub or a damn row boat with USS stern number its one to many and a total waste of taxpayers money!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrightKnight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-20-11 02:02 AM
Response to Reply #6
22. That ship has to be worth much more than scrap steel!
The Navy might not have a use for it but somebody would. Give it to an NGO or an alley that might have a use for it. Scrapping it is almost as wasteful as building it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kaleva Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-20-11 10:32 AM
Response to Reply #22
32. A single hull oiler isn't a good thing for anyone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Stranger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-20-11 11:00 AM
Response to Reply #22
34. Donate it to Sea Shepherd and ram it into the Japanese whalers.
Whaddaya think?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Stranger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-20-11 11:00 AM
Response to Reply #22
35. Donate it to Sea Shepherd and ram it into the Japanese whalers.
Whaddaya think?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bossy22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-11 10:26 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. shows how much you know
the navy infact can never have enough ships. Its just a simple numerical fact- the ocean is just too vast. The world's navies (especially the U.S.) are in reality the police force of the world- the majority of commerce is done by sea and these forces protect that commerce. Navies are also the world's foremost disaster response teams capable of delivering much needed supplies in large quantities.

Also, did you know that many SEAL teams deploy from nuclear submarines? There is no more versatile platform on earth than a nuclear submarine. It can sneak into coastal areas, drop off special forces, and then pick them up- without being ever detected. So without them how would you get SEAL teams to a country with large coast line? Would you just drive a surface ship right up to the beach and drop them off? How about fly a C-17 into their airspace- forget about the fact that this aircraft would be picked up my radar and fired upon by SAMs (and most likely shot down).

Also- what should we tell our Merchant fleet (which we do have)? "Sorry guys, you are on your own"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yon_Yonson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-11 11:06 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. I sure am glad that you set me straight on this one
My best guess is that we have 43 US Navy nuclear submarines on patrol dropping of SEAL units wherever. Awful expensive mood of transportation but then what do I know? I do know that a surface ship undercover of darkness with rubber rafts might be less expensive. Then again the SEALS are supermen and maybe we could ask them to walk on water.

How much of the pie do you warriors need to keep us safe from all these evil doers in the world? Last I heard you were chewing up about 43% of the pie and were not any safer than we were after 9-11. Ten years of warfare has got us no closer to a safer world! My gut tells me you folks won’t be happy till you bring the struggling American economy into default.

I believe in a strong American defensive military but our days of giving military industrial complex an open checkbook and our nation building needs to come to a conclusion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeSwiss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-11 09:42 PM
Response to Original message
3. Good.
A terrible waste of money, certainly.

But no death and destruction for you!



- K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-11 09:43 PM
Response to Original message
4. and how many people went to jail or prison for this taxpayer fraud? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yon_Yonson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-11 10:26 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. No this isn't naval fraud it's just piss poor management and leadership
and that's not a crime in NEOCON amerika
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lib2DaBone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-11 09:51 PM
Response to Original message
5. And how much did this cost taxpayers?
We can't fix our roads.. or give Granny $500 a month after she worked her whole life...

But.. Military... an open check book....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PavePusher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-11 11:15 PM
Response to Reply #5
13. Really? I don't think you've ever seen the military up close, or from the inside...
or you'd know that is not at all the truth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yon_Yonson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-11 11:19 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. I have seen it way up close, from the inside and I do think it's time to stop wasting tax money
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-11 10:34 PM
Response to Original message
10. Henry Eckford was indicted for fraud.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yon_Yonson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-11 11:15 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. Help me out here ... Henry Eckford died in 1832
Your reference source states and I see no mention of fraud?

Henry EckfordFrom Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Henry Eckford may refer to:

Persons
Henry Eckford (shipbuilder) (1775-1832), a Scottish-born shipbuilder and naval architect who worked in the United States and Ottoman Empire during the early 19th century
Henry Eckford (horticulturist) (1823-1905), a British horticulturist

Ships
PS Henry Eckford, the first steamship to be powered by a compound engine
USNS Henry Eckford (T-AO-192), an oiler of the United States Navy launched in 1989 but never completed and now in reserve.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-11 11:43 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. Click on the shipbuilder Henry Eckford link and you'll read all about him.
"One U.S. Navy ship, the fleet replenishment oiler USNS Henry Eckford (T-AO-192), has been named for Henry Eckford"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yon_Yonson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-20-11 08:27 AM
Response to Reply #17
29. OOPS ... my mistake
I thought it was fraud in relationship to the oil tankers in question
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-11 11:14 PM
Response to Original message
12. End the MIC -- and the national security state -- and make the world safe for PEACE -- !!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gtar100 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-20-11 12:04 AM
Response to Original message
18. My god; what a shame.
What a god-damn shame.

The big pig in the room is yet again the military. The military loves our country so much and protects it so well that it's going to bleed us dry. Sounds perfectly American to me.

Seriously, if the people who ran the military really gave a rat's ass about *real* patriotism and freedom, they'd be mad as all hell at the waste, corruption and abuse going on in their own midst. I'm talking about the upper ranks in the military. But they've built a culture of a complete lack of respect for the very system that supports them (we the taxpayers). Yet again, self-interest trumps all. Ironic, given it's happening in a system that spouts out about "service" and "sacrifice" all the time. Maybe they should apply those principles to the sacred trust they are given with our blood and treasure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoapBox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-20-11 12:09 AM
Response to Reply #18
19. Feels more like...what a SCAM.
And I agree with the comment that the "big-pig" is indeed the military.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PavePusher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-20-11 01:40 AM
Response to Reply #19
21. I'm not so sure.
The article is noteably short on details. Were the ships requested by the Navy, or forced into the budget as Congressional pork, much like the famed current fighter aircraft with two different engine manufacturers...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PatrynXX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-20-11 12:22 AM
Response to Original message
20. can't seem to use that link
Comodo Firewall tells me its a phishing site. X_X
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-20-11 02:17 AM
Response to Original message
23. Not to nickel and dime, but why are we getting nothing from the Texas salvage yard, either?
I know it would be a drop in the bucket, but it annoys me that they are so cavalier with our money. Heck, even when I re-design a piece of jewelry, I get the scrap value of any precious bit that was excess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gtar100 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-20-11 03:20 AM
Response to Reply #23
24. Don't be surprised if the salvage yard turns around and sells the metal back to the military.
Cavalier is a good word for their attitude toward all this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yon_Yonson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-20-11 08:29 AM
Response to Reply #24
30. Most likely going to China or Japan
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
christx30 Donating Member (774 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-20-11 06:03 AM
Response to Original message
25. If they would stop shit like this
then we wouldn't need to be talking about the debt ceiling. We could do a mild tax increase that wouldn't really hurt anyone.
But this kind of crap happens all over the place all the time. They nickel and dime us to death, then they talk about raising taxes and lowering services to where my grandfather might not get his social security check?! There needs to be an investigation into the wastefulness of Washington and the military.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_Tires Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-20-11 07:35 AM
Response to Reply #25
28. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yon_Yonson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-20-11 08:39 AM
Response to Reply #25
31. It’s a sad reality but they won’t and they can’t investigate them self
Our government is incapable of policing itself because its graft and corruption personified. The military industrial complex has an open checkbook to waste and fraud and they will be the downfall of America.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Earth_First Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-20-11 06:19 AM
Response to Original message
26. Paging Paul Watson... n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tanyev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-20-11 07:03 AM
Response to Original message
27. Can we rename them the George W. Bush and the DIck Cheney?
Edited on Wed Jul-20-11 07:03 AM by tanyev
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ptah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-20-11 10:48 AM
Response to Original message
33. Looks like a very old pair of ships.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henry_J._Kaiser_class_oiler

The first ship, Henry J. Kaiser, was laid down on 22 August 1984,
and construction continued until delivery of the final unit, Laramie,
on 7 May 1996. Four shipyards were involved in the construction.
Of the 16 completed ships, two -- John Ericsson and Kanawha --
were contracted to Sun Shipbuilding and Drydock Company of Chester,
Pennsylvania, for construction, and Avondale Shipyard, Inc., of
New Orleans, Louisiana, built the other 14.


Built:             August 1984-May 1996
In service:     December 1986-present
Building:         0
Planned:         18
Completed:     16
Cancelled:     2 (both laid up incomplete)
Active:         15 US, 1 Chile as of 1 March 2011


------------------

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 02:14 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC