Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login

Judge backs blocking of e-mail flood | Sacramento Bee

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
Ediacara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-07-04 07:04 PM
Original message
Judge backs blocking of e-mail flood | Sacramento Bee
Judge backs blocking of e-mail flood
The action was taken to protect the Capitol's system, he rules

By Denny Walsh -- Bee Staff Writer
Published 2:15 a.m. PDT Wednesday, April 7, 2004

A Sacramento federal judge has found that blocking an overwhelming number of electronic messages to state lawmakers is an acceptable means of combating a potential breakdown of the Legislature's e-mail system.

While the constitutional guarantee of free speech extends to the Internet, reasonable restrictions may be imposed as long as they are not content-based, serve a significant government interest and leave other communication channels open, U.S. Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds ruled.

In an order issued last month, Moulds tossed out an anti-tax group's lawsuit seeking monetary damages and an injunction because a legislative employee blocked delivery of tens of thousands of e-mails sent to the Capitol over a three-day period.

Campaign for California Families, a conservative, Sacramento-based nonprofit organization behind the flood of messages, sued the state and the Legislature, claiming violations of the due process and First Amendment rights of citizens wishing to express opposition to new taxes.

More at the Sacramento Bee
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
whatelseisnew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 06:31 AM
Response to Original message
1. Many of us have experienced an e-gap in communications w/gov't.
Now I always call, in addition to e-mailing , if I bother emailing at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 07:42 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. One of the big problems with e-mailing legislators
is that the offices is that a large percentage of the emails are from people who are not constituents. Many offices barely have the resources to process all correspondence from constituents. Snail mail is a lot easier to determine if it is from a constituent, as most people will put a return address on the envelope or the letter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Jul 26th 2017, 05:01 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC