Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

State wants judge to allow ban on Shariah law to proceed

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-10 05:39 AM
Original message
State wants judge to allow ban on Shariah law to proceed
Edited on Wed Nov-17-10 06:20 AM by struggle4progress
Source: Oklahoman

Published: November 17, 2010
Attorneys ask judge to allow ban on Shariah law to proceed

A voter-passed ballot measure that would ban use of Islamic law in Oklahoma courts should be allowed to take effect, attorneys for the state urged a federal district judge Tuesday. District Judge Vicki Miles-LaGrange has issued a temporary restraining order barring State Question 755 from being implemented ...

Read more: http://newsok.com/state-wants-judge-to-allow-ban-on-shariah-law-to-proceed/article/3515318
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-10 06:04 AM
Response to Original message
1. OMG. This is SERIES!!!!11111!!!!
Edited on Wed Nov-17-10 06:06 AM by No Elephants
Oklahoma cannot afford to have in place a temporary restraining order.

Heaven only knows what Sharia laws the Oklahoma legislature may enact during the trial!

Burka Chic malls are already opening in Tulsa (or so I hear)--and so close to Ground Zero, too!


Keep fear alive! Keep fear alive! Keep fear alive!

This post brought to you by the Republicon Committee of Oklahoma and the Koch Brothers--your only sources in the U.S. of physical, emotional, moral and religious safety. (And, you're welcome.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mwb970 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-10 06:51 AM
Response to Original message
2. We have so many backward states.
Edited on Wed Nov-17-10 06:51 AM by mwb970
Oklahoma, South Carolina, Mississippi, Texas, Louisiana - what exactly is wrong with the people in these places?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no_hypocrisy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-10 07:15 AM
Response to Original message
3. Wouldn't the challenge fail on constitutional grounds?
Specifically, the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. If the "Shariah Court Law" were invalidated, then wouldn't rabbinical counsels be equally prohibited? Orthodox Jews would be forced to remain married under Jewish law. And what about annulments from The Vatican? Same thing.

This Oklahoma law is redundant in any case. No law, religious or secular (e.g., vigilanteism) can supplant established statutes and case law of the United States.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
plcdude Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-10 05:55 PM
Response to Reply #3
17. exactly
as well as a number of other State Questions that were on the ballot all of which I voted against. We have a long way to go to bring people up to speed about democracy, reality, etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blandocyte Donating Member (830 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-10 07:19 AM
Response to Original message
4. Also banning zombies and unicorns
A useful law.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-10 08:06 AM
Response to Original message
5. what shariah laws do they want banned?
i take it that the dumb fucks who want to ban shariah law have no clue about the many differences in the shariah law.

is there something in the water in oklahoma?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sally cat Donating Member (544 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-10 08:29 PM
Response to Reply #5
18. Help them decide. Which ones are OK in OK?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jefferson23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-10 08:59 AM
Response to Original message
6. My deepest sympathies to the sane people of Oklahoma who have
Edited on Wed Nov-17-10 09:00 AM by Jefferson23
to put up with these assholes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-10 09:45 AM
Response to Original message
7. Council of American Islamic Relations has a good summary here:
http://www.cair.com/ArticleDetails.aspx?ArticleID=26678&&name=n&&currPage=1

One interesting item this made me think of is if they ban International law, couldn't a Health Insurance company say they don't need to cover the spouses of anyone not married legally in the United States?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-10 10:04 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
harun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-10 10:41 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. How can a marriage contract be based on mysogynist values?
What CAIR is saying is if someone in Morroco is married, then moves to Oklahoma, that marriage contract should be considered legal in Oklahoma.

You are letting your ignorance get in the way of the reality that this is a legally impractical law.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bragi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-10 11:04 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. I reject your 'red herring' argument
Edited on Wed Nov-17-10 11:15 AM by Bragi
The issue here is not recognizing marriages done in other countries. This has never been a problem, and raising it as the rationale for CAIR's opposition to the Okla law seems, well, something of a specious diversion.

The issue, as I understand it, is whether U.S courts should enforce marriage contracts, for example, that are based on Sharia law. Sharia law, in turn, reflects many mysogynist values, such as the right of men to order their wives about, to physically punish them, and worse.

The Okla law would simply exclude as a defense the fact that a marriage contract was entered into that reflects Sharia law.

As an aside, the more that CAIR campaigns against this supposed "idiotic" ballot result, the more I think that the proposed ban is something other than the "legally impractical law" that you and they claim it to be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-10 02:12 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. You are using the term Sharia law as if it means Arab culture.
If you have problem's with Arab culture, fine, so do I. Don't stigmatize my religion by confusing the two.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bragi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-10 02:35 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. Fair point
Yes, my concern is principally with radical forms of Islam, particularly Wahhabism, which as you no doubt know, are much promoted by the Saudis and other Arab states.

And yes, I do recognize that the interpretation of Sharia law isn't the same everywhere in the Muslim world.

However, I still think it would be a bad idea to allow Sharia law to be used as an argument, or in a ruling, in a U.S court.

(I also think it would also be a bad idea to use dictates in the Bible, or in any other religious book, in U.S courts.)

On the matter of the Okla. ballot, I think it was provocative and probably legally unnecessary, given the First Amendment, but the more CAIR fights it, the more I wonder about the future role CAIR sees for Sharia law in U.S courts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Turborama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-10 01:42 AM
Response to Reply #15
20. Which "other Arab states" promote Wahabism?
Edited on Thu Nov-18-10 02:03 AM by Turborama
Or is this another guess?

And what's that minority cult got to do with Muslims getting married?


ETA for some perspective:



Source of that diagram: http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?pid=7171026&id=607062673
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bragi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-10 10:14 AM
Response to Reply #20
21. Noted. Nice infograph. /nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
avebury Donating Member (455 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-10 09:56 AM
Response to Original message
8. SQ755 also would outlaw the Ten Commandments from being used in the courts
The Ten Commandments were developed in another part of the world (ban on international law would kick in)within another culture. A unique side effect of the unexpected consequences of this SQ.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bragi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-10 10:06 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. They are already "outlawed"
Edited on Wed Nov-17-10 10:10 AM by Bragi
My understanding is that, because of the First Amendment, neither the 10 commandments nor any other religious injunction can be cited and used in deciding court cases in the U.S.

Am I wrong on that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-10 10:43 AM
Response to Original message
12. this is wildly Stupid and Bigoted
congrats OK... glad I do not live there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftishBrit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-10 02:41 PM
Response to Original message
16. Yes, I'm sure that Shariah law is a big problem in Oklahoma!
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lunasun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-10 11:19 PM
Response to Original message
19. Ok must be a very money rich state that it can waste taxpayers $$ on such BS
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 09:12 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC