Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Treasury Hid A.I.G. Loss, Report Says

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-26-10 09:11 AM
Original message
Treasury Hid A.I.G. Loss, Report Says
Source: CNBC/NYT

The United States Treasury concealed $40 billion in likely taxpayer losses on the bailout of the American International Group earlier this month, when it abandoned its usual method for valuing investments, according to a report by the special inspector general for the Troubled Asset Relief Program.

“In our view, this is a significant failure in their transparency,” said Neil M. Barofsky, the inspector general, in an interview on Monday.

In early October, the Treasury issued a report predicting that the taxpayers would ultimately lose just $5 billion on their investment in A.I.G., a remarkable outcome, since the insurance company was extended $182 billion in taxpayer money in the early months of its rescue. The prediction of a modest loss, widely reported as A.I.G., the Federal Reserve and the Treasury rushed to complete an exit plan, contrasted with an earlier prediction by the Treasury that the taxpayers would lose $45 billion.

“The American people have a right for full and complete disclosure about their investment in A.I.G.,” Mr. Barofsky said, “and the U.S. government has an obligation, when they’re describing potential losses, to give complete information.”

Read more: http://www.cnbc.com/id/39846384
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-26-10 09:20 AM
Response to Original message
1. Everyone knows the bailout was a profitmaker for American taxpayers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-26-10 09:38 AM
Response to Original message
2. nice transparency...not
Thank God it passed! :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bhikkhu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-26-10 09:39 AM
Response to Original message
3. I don't get all the bailout crap
If you read the article, it just says that a 45 billion "loss" is current, while projecting that 40 billion of that will be recouped. Hence the 5 billion figure. It doesn't seem unclear or "hidden" that the 5 billion figure is a projection, and I think a projection of net losses is at least as valid and valuable as a current standing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-26-10 10:18 AM
Response to Original message
4. Imho, material facts re- the AIG bailout have been deliberately obfuscated.
I'm starting to believe the reason the current admin's done such a poor job defending its actions vis a vis the bankers is because they fear any detailed explanation will inculpate them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indepat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-26-10 05:11 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. I'm still waiting to learn how much windfall profit Goldman Sachs made on the, was it, $12.9 billion
received via the AIG bailout. I'm guessing +/- $12 billion. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 07:55 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC