Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Blythe Project: Biggest Solar Power Plant On U.S. Public Lands Approved By Obama Administration

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Tx4obama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-25-10 08:23 PM
Original message
Blythe Project: Biggest Solar Power Plant On U.S. Public Lands Approved By Obama Administration
Source: AP (via HuffPo)

WASHINGTON — The Obama administration has approved a thousand-megawatt solar project on federal land in southern California, the largest solar project ever planned on U.S. public lands.

Interior Secretary Ken Salazar hailed the $6 billion Blythe Solar Power Project, to be built in the Mojave Desert near Blythe, Calif., as the start of a boom in solar power on federal lands.

"Today is a day that makes me excited about the nation's future," Salazar said Monday at a news conference. "This project shows in a real way how harnessing our own renewable resources can create good jobs here at home."

The Blythe project, being developed by Solar Millennium, a German solar developer, is slated for more than 7,000 acres of public land near the Arizona border, some 225 miles east of Los Angeles.

Read more: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/10/25/biggest-solar-project-in-_n_773655.html



Full title of article didn't fit in text box above, here it is:
Blythe Project: Biggest Solar Power Plant On U.S. Public Lands Approved By Obama Administration For Mojave Desert, California


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
iandhr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-25-10 08:32 PM
Response to Original message
1. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SHRED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-25-10 09:38 PM
Response to Original message
2. Oh just great
More centralized energy production. Let's all cheer that we will remain beholden to corporate fat-cats for our energy needs.

The answer would have been to retrofit roof tops and give the home owner the break.
But that would be a Liberal/Left thing to do and God knows we must worship the Corporatists and their centralization wet dreams.


----
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Psephos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-26-10 01:11 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. sad but true n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quakerboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-26-10 01:16 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. A question
Are not both needed? For instance, If one lives in a multistory building, surrounded by other multistory buildings(so not able to make full use of the sides for light collection), I feel fairly certain you cannot supply within your building the complete energy needs of the building.


However, you are right. I have serious doubts that this public land and project will remain publicly owned for long after completion. Betcha the first Repub admin to come along sells it to the best connected bidder. Or maybe before then.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MX96391 Donating Member (64 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-26-10 02:57 PM
Response to Original message
5. Good decision by Obama
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 04:33 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC