Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Commission members study statements of Rice, Clarke

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
radfringe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-01-04 04:59 AM
Original message
Commission members study statements of Rice, Clarke
Commission members study statements of Rice, Clarke
http://www.dailynews.com/Stories/0,1413,200~20954~2054568,00.html

By Philip Shenon and Douglas Jehl
The New York Times


WASHINGTON -- The staff of the independent commission investigating the terror attacks on Sept. 11, 2001, is conducting a detailed review of all discrepancies found in public and private statements by Condoleezza Rice and Richard A. Clarke in drawing up questions for Rice when she testifies before the panel, probably next week, commission officials said Wednesday.

--snip---

The White House, they said, is hoping to limit any political damage to the president by having Rice testify quickly in the hope of ending the furor over the accusations made by Clarke, Bush's former counterterrorism director.

---snip---

We're working with the commission to move forward as quickly as possible," said White House spokesman Scott McClellan. "I think most Americans view Dick Clarke and his contradictions as yesterday's news."

Commission members, speaking on condition of anonymity, said the panel's staff had been asked in the wake of Clarke's testimony last week to carefully review all testimony and other remarks that both he and Rice have made since Sept. 11, to determine where they disagree
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
No Mandate Here. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-01-04 06:12 AM
Response to Original message
1. Let's hope they do their preparation well...
... so * can be yesterday's president.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
molly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-01-04 07:18 AM
Response to Original message
2. Yep - yesterday's news that won't go away
I can't wait to watch her try to lie her way out of this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-01-04 07:25 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. she will be well rehearsed
Edited on Thu Apr-01-04 07:27 AM by xchrom
and her lies will be pat.
there's something fishy here -- as other duers have pointed out.
i don't think we'll see the shape of it until her testimony.
the rest, unfortunately, we won't see. cheney and bush go be hind closed doors.

i was wrong about bush under oath and behind closed doors.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
molly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-01-04 07:28 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. She is a HORRIBLE liar
she gets nervous and blinks her eyes a lot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-01-04 07:37 AM
Response to Original message
5. key excerpt:
The former staff director, Eleanor J. Hill, a former federal prosecutor and congressional aide whose management of the investigation was widely praised by Democrats and Republicans alike, said the congressional investigation turned up evidence to support Clarke's contention that the Bush administration had paid too little attention to terror in the months before the Sept. 11 attacks.

Hill said that while she no longer had access to transcripts of the classified testimony given by Clarke to the joint investigation, she could not identify large contradictions between his testimony last week and his testimony to Congress two years ago.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seafan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-01-04 10:53 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. This is what Bob Graham says as well. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-01-04 12:59 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. I missed that - good for Senator Graham!
He has had this as a primary concern since the time of the war resolution vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 11:30 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC