Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

GOP ramps up attacks on SEC over porn surfing

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
formercia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-10 07:15 AM
Original message
GOP ramps up attacks on SEC over porn surfing
Source: Yahoo News



By DANIEL WAGNER, AP Business Writer Daniel Wagner, Ap Business Writer – Fri Apr 23, 4:10 am ET

WASHINGTON – Republicans are stepping up their criticism of the Securities and Exchange Commission following reports that senior agency staffers spent hours surfing pornographic websites on government-issued computers while they were supposed to be policing the nation's financial system.

California Rep. Darrell Issa, the top Republican on the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, said it was "disturbing that high-ranking officials within the SEC were spending more time looking at porn than taking action to help stave off the events that put our nation's economy on the brink of collapse."

He said in a statement Thursday that SEC officials "were preoccupied with other distractions" when they should have been overseeing the growing problems in the financial system.

The SEC's inspector general conducted 33 probes of employees looking at explicit images in the past five years, according to a memo obtained by The Associated Press.



Read more: http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100423/ap_on_bi_ge/us_sec_porn



Do they really want to go there? ....and who was at the helm of the SEC at the time? A Bush Appointee.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mucifer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-10 07:24 AM
Response to Original message
1. Is that all they got? Pathetic. I knew they would go there.
I was surprised that cnn radio top of the hour news over the past few days has been more supportive of the democratic side on the wall st. issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
izquierdista Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-10 07:35 AM
Response to Original message
2. When the pig says the food is spoiled...
...where do you end up throwing it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cbdo2007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-10 07:44 AM
Response to Original message
3. BREAKING NEWS - The SEC isn't doing it's job!!! ha ha
No shit sherlock! Obama needs to completely clear cut this agency and start from scratch.

Why does it seem like the entire govt and Wall Street, etc. all just sort of had a "we can get away with anything" attitude during the Bush Admin? Oh yeah, cause he was distracting everyone with all these wars so really they could get away with anything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-10 07:55 AM
Response to Original message
4. Hey, aren't these SEC jerkers all Bush-Cheney Family Values appointees?
I mean, this has the stank of Republicon Family Values all over it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
formercia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-10 08:21 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. You just had to ask.
:rofl:

The GOP wailing is not about truth, but about perception.

The GOP doth protest too much, Methinks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-10 08:28 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. The DEMS need to point this out. Scream out the truth
Maybe, just maybe, the corporate MSM (R) will let a peep of the truth out about this....

Republicon Hypocrites (a redundant phrase)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nancy Waterman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-10 10:18 AM
Response to Reply #4
13. Most of the porn investigation is during the Bush years
2007 and 2008 from what i have read.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TankLV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-24-10 07:50 PM
Response to Reply #4
25. Yep - and the incidents stem from around January of 2009
Edited on Sat Apr-24-10 07:51 PM by TankLV
Or were first discovered then - that's when the investigations that lead to this latest announcement...

You know - a few DAYS after Obama took office, and the office that is STILL staffed with bush* appointees because the repukes refuse to approve of Obama's appointees?

But don't confuse the repukes with FACTS that is is the REPUKES who were surfing porn!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
formercia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-25-10 08:46 AM
Response to Reply #25
27. It will take years to clean house at SEC
and the same goes for the rest of Junior's stay behind fifth-column embedded in the Federal Government.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-25-10 08:47 AM
Response to Reply #4
28. not clear. a bunch of the cited instances took place in 2009 and this year
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BR_Parkway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-10 08:22 AM
Response to Original message
6. Republican Appointed SEC under Bush fails to police Wall St, opting
to watch porn during time of increased administration pressure to further deregulate.


I'm down with that headline, bring it on
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughMoran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-10 08:30 AM
Response to Original message
8. I remember that old toon where the Internet Explorer icon was simply marked "PORN"
Edited on Fri Apr-23-10 08:31 AM by HughMoran
:rofl:

Dems should probably condemn the stupidity too and move on. If the Repukes want to make hay out of this, Dems can simply point out that they are Republican appointees for the most part and that this is typical Republican behavior based on the massive number of Republican sex scandals in the past 5 years :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-10 09:07 AM
Response to Original message
9. let senator Vitter lead an investigation lol nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
on point Donating Member (613 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-10 09:12 AM
Response to Original message
10. I guess republicans shouldn't be trusted to run govt!
Issa says this calls into question whether we should have more government regulation over Wal St. Actually, what it says is we should never ever trust management of government to the republicans again. They are right when they say government doesn't know how to run anything, at least when they are in charge!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
socialist_n_TN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-24-10 01:35 PM
Response to Reply #10
19. I've had righties argue this too....................
It's so stupid of an argument. Just because one side when it was the government is incompetent does NOT follow that the other side will be as incompetent JUST BECAUSE IT'S ALL GOVERNMENT.

I argued that and also mentioned that people who don't BELIEVE in government should never be EXPECTED to govern competently. I've never understood that line of reasoning either. Elect me, I'm a Republican who believes government is evil, so I'll be good at it! Yeah, that makes a lot of sense. NOT!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-25-10 02:13 PM
Response to Reply #10
33. They haven't been interested in "running" government for decades...
They are out to prove that "government doesn't work". And every time they're in power... they go about proving it in the most egregious ways possible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MidwestTransplant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-10 10:06 AM
Response to Original message
11. Like going to a lesbian bondage club but different.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-10 10:11 AM
Response to Original message
12. Breaking News: GOP finds way to make self look noble
Edited on Fri Apr-23-10 10:12 AM by fascisthunter
although, these are probably GOP/Bush appointments!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-10 10:25 AM
Response to Original message
14. From the party of S&M clubs, this is particularly rich.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cilla4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-10 11:06 AM
Response to Original message
15. Nice.
This enrages me for a NUMBER of reasons, not the least of which: those assholes HAVE jobs; I can't GET a job. Shit - I've done everything "right," honesty, integrity, competence, conscientiousness. AND, I've NEVER watched porn on the job.

Fuckers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-10 03:33 PM
Response to Original message
16. Classic red herring. "Look!!! Over there!!" nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mikeSchmuckabee Donating Member (288 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-24-10 06:26 AM
Response to Original message
17. These are the same people who elected to give mark foley
a pass. So I guess they're pissed that they weren't homosexual kiddie porn sites.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
panzerfaust Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-24-10 08:09 AM
Response to Original message
18. "...who was at the helm of the SEC at the time?"
The public has forgotten, and our party won't mention it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bamacrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-24-10 02:15 PM
Response to Original message
20. Do they really want to do this with all their "wide stancers" in their party.
I mean Im sure if it were not political and social suicide the republicans would be the gayest party in the world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThoughtCriminal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-24-10 03:58 PM
Response to Original message
21. SEC Commissioners - 2007-2008
I do not know if the Commissioners selected these "senior staffers", but if the GOP wants to grandstand on this at least it should be noted that it happened on their watch. The last Clinton appointee left in 2002. During the time this was happening, it was the Republicans in charge.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Securities_and_Exchange_Commission_appointees
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-25-10 02:14 PM
Response to Reply #21
34. yup. . n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThoughtCriminal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-24-10 04:02 PM
Response to Original message
22. When you spend your entire work day looking the other way
you have to have something to fill the hours. Under GOP control, not doing their job, WAS THEIR JOB.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old Troop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-24-10 05:48 PM
Response to Original message
23. Kettle, meet pot
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dappleganger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-24-10 05:53 PM
Response to Original message
24. I'd bet he'd back down from that shit in a New York minute if they published
web history from all of the GOP offices on the Hill.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TomCADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-24-10 08:04 PM
Response to Original message
26. Does it occur to them that most surfing occurred under Republican rule? Chris Cox
This took place under the past five years with Chris Cox as chair.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-25-10 08:56 AM
Response to Reply #26
29. true, but it continued after Cox left
Edited on Sun Apr-25-10 08:58 AM by onenote
Of the the 33 incidents identified by the IG report, three were reported this year. Ten occurred in 2009, 16 in 2008, two in 2007 and one each in 2006 and 2005.

what we don't know is when the employees involved were hired -- were they career employees or political employees?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vogon_Glory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-25-10 09:44 AM
Response to Original message
30. But Those SEC Staffers Were Letting The Market Regulate Itself!
But those SEC staffers were keeping the hands of 'big gubmint' out of the securities industries and letting the market regulate itself--just like former US senator Phil Gramm and other anti-regulatory zealots still admired by those Republican politicians wanted them to.

:crazy:

:tinfoilhat:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vogon_Glory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-25-10 09:45 AM
Response to Reply #30
31. One of the Dirty Books in My Personal Collection Is Titled 'Stocks and Bonds' n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hollowdweller Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-25-10 10:37 AM
Response to Original message
32. Why was the porn not blocked??

Most state and federal computers have extensive blocking software. My wife works in public health and even some of the sites she needs to get on in the course of her job are blocked. So how is it the SEC managed to avoid the gov't firewalls?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anigbrowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-25-10 04:33 PM
Response to Reply #32
35. Such blocks are fairly easy to circumvent
Apparently one staffer used a USB key with a separate browser configured to go via a proxy server. It's hard to block everything.

Plus you can't just auto-block all picture files. Legal documents are often supplied as in graphical format (as scans of paper documents), and you could even have a legitimate reason to examine porn - for example, if you were investigating a hedge fund for evidence that fund managers were looking at porn when they should have been monitoring client accounts - sounds unlikely, but it does actually happen.

Mrs Browl works for a litigation support company (bulk document processing for law firms) and sometimes they have cases involving exactly that, with heaps of porn as part of the evidence. One time they even had to fire some of their own staff who had started collecting it from evidence they were supposed to be managing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hollowdweller Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-25-10 07:55 PM
Response to Reply #35
37. Then they should get in trouble
Or be fired if they went that far to get around agency policy.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
buckrogers1965 Donating Member (515 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-25-10 07:36 PM
Response to Original message
36. Wasn't this overseen by Bush?
When the economy was tanking?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
and-justice-for-all Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-25-10 08:56 PM
Response to Original message
38. alright, time to bring on the S&M sessions they bought Mr.Steele.nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-26-10 08:49 AM
Response to Original message
39. They had to be doing something during all that time that they weren't doing their job. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 09:37 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC