Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Priest says he was pressurised into taking blame for pope

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
brooklynite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-10 01:34 PM
Original message
Priest says he was pressurised into taking blame for pope
Edited on Mon Apr-19-10 01:35 PM by brooklynite
Source: Irish Times

A FORMER vicar-general in the archdiocese of Munich has claimed that he was pressurised last month into taking the blame for a mistake made 30 years ago by the then Archbishop of Munich, Joseph Ratzinger (now Pope Benedict), concerning the case of a paedophile priest.

Fr Gerhard Gruber has now said he did so only after coming under huge pressure from unnamed Catholic Church sources to take responsibility, so as to “take the pope out of the firing line”.

In a letter to a friend, seen by German weekly magazine Der Spiegel , Fr Gruber wrote that he was “begged” in numerous phone calls and after receiving a prepared statement by fax for him to sign. The magazine said Fr Gruber expresses unhappiness in the letter at being given the sole blame in public.

A spokesman for Munich archdiocese has dismissed the report as “completely made up”, saying Fr Gruber was at no point forced to sign anything but that he merely assisted in formulating the statement.


Read more: http://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/frontpage/2010/0419/1224268630491.html



Guessing he won't be getting a Christmas Card from Vatican...

(pressurised?)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ananda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-10 01:37 PM
Response to Original message
1. pressurised is British spelling
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-10 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. British word. We say "pressured."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paulsby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-10 02:06 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. i was going to make an animal house reference
"tires are pressurized, PEOPLE are pressured"

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CoffeeCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-10 11:23 PM
Response to Reply #7
33. vegetables are pressurized...
...people are pressured.

;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tavalon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-10 02:52 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. Isn't it kind of embarassing that we are so provincial that we don't know alternate spellings
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
happygoluckytoyou Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-10 04:37 PM
Response to Reply #8
17. IN A RELATED STORY pope offers sale of choir boys robes.... half off ! !
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kurtzapril4 Donating Member (354 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-10 06:46 PM
Response to Reply #8
25. No, it isn't.
Pressured and pressurised mean two different things entirely. I'm sure they mean two entirely different things in England, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-20-10 03:48 AM
Response to Reply #25
35. British say Pressurised. It is an acceptable alternate. It is not incorrect.
Dictionary.com:

pressure v. to force (someone) toward a particular end; influence

pressurize v. to apply pressure
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jeff In Milwaukee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-10 09:05 PM
Response to Reply #8
31. Ummm....That's not an alternate spelling
These are two different words.

Kind of embarrassing...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-20-10 07:32 AM
Response to Reply #31
39. It IS an alternate spelling of "pressurize." Alternatively, you could say that "pressurize" is an
alternate spelling of pressurise, since the Brit version preceded the American.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-20-10 07:30 AM
Response to Reply #8
38. We?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zambero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-10 04:40 PM
Response to Reply #2
18. So is this being a "Scapepope"?
As far as the selection process for pope goes -- I sense that the Church would need to look very long and hard to find a senior archbishop who didn't at some point participate in the sanctioned policy of "rehabilitation and relocation" for the pedophile priests within their archdiocese. I don't know whether a large scale "Mea Culpa & move on" will cut it", but pressuring a fall guy into taking the blame for crimes of omission committed by a higer up CERTAINLY doesn't cut it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
izquierdista Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-10 01:40 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. He must have felt like an aeroplane then
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ikonoklast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-10 04:20 PM
Response to Reply #3
15. What colour?
Or was it just unpainted aluminium?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TrollBuster9090 Donating Member (569 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-10 04:23 PM
Response to Reply #1
16. Did they put him in a Crock Pot?
Edited on Mon Apr-19-10 04:25 PM by TrollBuster9090
(The Crock Pot would be sort of a modern day version of those classic old SPANISH INQUISITION tools.) Or maybe one of those pressure chambers, like when you come up from a deep sea diving expidition and need to worry about "the bends." No pun intended.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-20-10 07:26 AM
Response to Reply #1
36. Self delete.
Edited on Tue Apr-20-10 07:33 AM by No Elephants
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ozymanithrax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-10 01:42 PM
Response to Original message
4. pressurised? What did they fill him full of to preasurize him? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KansDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-10 01:42 PM
Response to Original message
5. Yeah, you know...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jberryhill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-10 01:50 PM
Response to Original message
6. Duh... its Pastorized

They are all pastorized when they are ordained.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
h9socialist Donating Member (584 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-10 03:18 PM
Response to Original message
9. Heavens to John Mitchell!!!!!!!!!
This scandal can now be called "Vaticangate."

"People need to know, is their Pontiff a crook? Well, I am not a crook!"

"Let's pray together Henry!"

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stuart G Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-10 06:46 PM
Response to Reply #9
23. Richard Nixon would be proud....It seems that a John Dean has arrived.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomRain Donating Member (164 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-10 03:30 PM
Response to Original message
10. I wonder if he's afraid of some sort of charges being brought
Wouldn't that be something?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeSwiss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-10 03:32 PM
Response to Original message
11. K&R
- Forced to bear false witness, eh?


“Whatever hits the fan will not be evenly distributed” ~ Steven Wright
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ZombieHorde Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-10 05:06 PM
Response to Reply #11
20. Exactly, but the sheep won't care. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeSwiss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-10 05:52 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. True.
- But I suppose if they did care, they wouldn't call them sheep.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yellowcanine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-10 03:32 PM
Response to Original message
12. Sounds like the word that fits is "sanitized" or "whitewashed"
Seriously, this is serious shit. The "spokesman" can yelp all he wants about this being "completely made up" but that just makes it sound worse - now he is basically calling the priest a liar. And if the priest was "assisted in formulating the statement" it would be inaccurate to say "completely made up". So just who is the liar?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Soulis Donating Member (51 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-10 03:41 PM
Response to Original message
13. Just following orders
As always with the monsters!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doc Martin Donating Member (233 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-10 03:50 PM
Response to Original message
14. Authoritarian leadership cultivating compliance
That is the reform of the reform (Vatican II) in the RC Church since the John Paul II-Ratzinger papacy and now during the Ratzinger papacy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Angry Dragon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-10 04:58 PM
Response to Original message
19. After reading the Irish Times story
I have come to the conclusion that these men do not have god in their hearts or souls. They hide behind the word god spewing from their mouths but have no idea what a god is. Lets all use the god defense to get out of any crime we may commit. I was working for god so I can not be held accountable for my actions. If these men truly had god inside of themselves, truly believed and could think for themselves they would protect the people they claim they are trying to save. These men are the lowest of the low and pieces of garbage.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pjt7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-10 06:38 PM
Response to Reply #19
22. Ratzinger needs to go
& be replaced with a great Pope.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bkozumplik Donating Member (391 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-10 06:46 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. or be replaced with no pope
even better
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-10 06:58 PM
Response to Reply #22
26. This Pope discredited himself long before he rose to the Papacy
The Vatican needs to clean house, and it can't do it while Ratzo sits on Peter's chair.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ooglymoogly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-10 07:45 PM
Response to Reply #22
28. in the footsteps of Jesus. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brooklynite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-10 08:53 PM
Response to Reply #22
30. Ratzinger was picked by the current College of Cardinals...
Edited on Mon Apr-19-10 08:53 PM by brooklynite
Why would they do a better job next time?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jeff In Milwaukee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-10 09:06 PM
Response to Reply #30
32. You have to wonder what they were thinking....
Of all people to put in this position -- and you can't tell me that NOT ONE of them knew the whole story. It's really just a slap in the face of the victims.

Infallible, my ass....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PATRICK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-20-10 07:29 AM
Response to Reply #30
37. Ratzinger
was a favorite doctrinal hitman of all the post-Vatican reactionary popes. As a disastrous close advisor of the last pope he helped pack the college of cardinals who voted him in. All very reminiscent of Dick Cheney. He did the cover up for predator pedophiles while grilling and threatening positive and saintly Church theologians. By all apparent signs he basically had himself chosen just in case the Holy Spirit was a little less thrilled. Now he reaps what all bad popes do, but like any of the current miserable crop of a%%holes seemingly in power everywhere, something a like a Black death of world leadership, there is no getting rid of them. Anti-popes have resigned and one irascible saint disgusted at the intractability of the inner circles. This one has never been much in tune with the Spirit of the Church, set himself up over God anyway and will not destroy the Church by giving up his collapsing self fantasies by simply stepping down.

Hans Kung was one repeatedly attacked for his central role in the positive reforms of Vatican II so he might be a bit biased in favor of the Spirit as opposed to the Curia but he should know the poeple he is appealing too have similarly been chosen over the decades to be safe yes-men(or much much worse) to the central power of the Retrenchment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CoffeeCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-10 11:26 PM
Response to Reply #19
34. They are pure evil...
The Pope is supposed to be "infallible" and this is what we get.

If it wasn't for religion, I would probably believe in God.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ooglymoogly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-10 07:43 PM
Response to Original message
27. Why is it that mean spirited hypocrites, like Ratz, always gravitate
toward the authoritarian Reich, um, right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-19-10 07:51 PM
Response to Original message
29. Dang, you could knock me over with a feather.
The Catholic hierarchy has always been so honest in the past.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-20-10 07:52 AM
Response to Original message
40. Um, say what?
"Fr Hullermann was allowed return to parish duties in Munich within weeks of arriving there. The priest reoffended and in June 1986 he was convicted of the sexual abuse of other minors and given an 18-month suspended sentence. When this emerged last month, Fr Gruber assumed total responsibility, thus seeming to absolve Pope Benedict.

Meanwhile, according to the Spanish daily La Verdad , Colombian cardinal Dario Castrillon Hoyos said at a weekend conference in Murcia that Pope John Paul approved the policy of not reporting to the police clerical sex abuse crimes.

In a September 2001 letter, recently published by the French Catholic publication Golias , Cardinal Hoyos wrote to French bishop Pierre Pican to congratulate him for not reporting an abuser priest. Earlier that year, Bishop Pican received a suspended three-month sentence for not reporting serial abuser Fr René Bissy,who was eventually given an 18-year prison sentence for child sex abuse crimes between 1989 and 1996.

It sounds as though Fr. Hullermann was reported to the authorities as a repeat offender and got--wait for it--all of 18 months--supspended. Failure to report, 3 months, also suspended.

Suspensions were bullshit in both instances, but a repeat abuser did not get sentence much worse than the guy who failed to report.

In sum, the secular authorities were not much better than that church authorities.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old Troop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-20-10 05:48 PM
Response to Original message
41. Doesn't "pressurised" mean inflated or filled with gas?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 11:27 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC