Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

US Wholesale Inventories Unexpectedly Fall 0.8% in Sign of Higher Demand

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Purveyor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-09-10 11:24 AM
Original message
US Wholesale Inventories Unexpectedly Fall 0.8% in Sign of Higher Demand
Source: BLOOMBERG



By Courtney Schlisserman

Feb. 9 (Bloomberg) -- Inventories at U.S. wholesalers unexpectedly fell in December following the biggest increase in more than five years, indicating distributors had trouble keeping up with demand.

The 0.8 percent decrease in stockpiles followed a revised 1.6 percent gain in November that was the largest since July 2004, figures from the Commerce Department showed today in Washington. Sales climbed 0.8 percent.

A record inventory drawdown last year has opened the door for manufacturers to pick up production and other companies to increase orders to meet demand. Efforts to prevent stockpiles from falling further in the fourth-quarter provided its biggest boost to economic growth in 20 years and may keep supporting the economy in coming quarters.

“The sales numbers are strong,” said David Sloan, a senior economist at 4Cast Inc., a New York forecasting firm. “If sales continue to rise, inventories are poised to be rebuilt.”

Economists forecast inventories would rise 0.5 percent after a previously estimated 1.5 percent increase in November, according to the median of 31 projections in a Bloomberg News survey. Estimates ranged from a drop of 0.8 percent to a 1 percent gain.

Job openings rose in December to 2.5 million from 2.43 million a month earlier, the first gain in three months, a report from the Labor Department also showed today. Manufacturers and retailers were among industries with the biggest increase in employment opportunities.

Read more: http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601103&sid=ay21tMFYUyiI
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
dmallind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-09-10 11:29 AM
Response to Original message
1. OK let's see who can spin this to mean doom first and best......NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
M155Y_A1CH Donating Member (921 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-09-10 11:48 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. How 'bout this one
Wow, this is great news for China!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dmallind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-09-10 12:36 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. The 2.5 million jobs are in China?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nyy1998 Donating Member (984 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-09-10 01:20 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. Winner would gets a prize, but we ran out of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nc4bo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-09-10 11:39 AM
Response to Original message
2. I guess it depends on what those products are. Considering it's Nov.-Dec.
Any of that related to the holiday season? More people buying, perhaps not buying frilly gifts but practical ones? Or the extra employees typically needed that time of year?

Income tax season coming - many people will be getting nice sized refund checks that could be used to buy "stuff" or provide a down payment on that car or whatever else they've been putting off purchasing...

I know we should all be looking for some optimism where ever we can find it, no one as much as me and my hubby who depend on the hotel/travel industry for the majority of our bread and butter but I'm having a hard time being optimistic from this one little report.

Now if it's sustained, way different story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mbperrin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-09-10 11:50 AM
Response to Original message
4. NONE of the reduction in value was due to markdowns on seasonal
merchandise after Christmas and New Year's?

Really?

Well, okie dokie then.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whattheidonot Donating Member (301 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-09-10 12:09 PM
Response to Original message
5. weak consumer income
These products were produced with less labor costs and still weak income figures. Not a robust combination. The bulk of these productions were most likely in essentials, essentials including electronic purchases.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-09-10 01:03 PM
Response to Original message
7. The "back to back" aspect of the two months is instructive.
Edited on Tue Feb-09-10 01:05 PM by TexasObserver
Inventories had the biggest increase in more than five years, followed by the biggest decrease (in December) in more than five years.

Here's what these data suggest: Inventories were built up in anticipation of the Christmas season, and those sales were pushed earlier than usual for the Christmas season. Then when December came, retailers sold more than they might have anticipated, causing inventories to drop more than expected.

The month by month approach is subject to swings that may not be real. Considering the entire quarter as a unit makes more sense. Comparing the numbers from that quarter to previous fourth quarters would likely show a more uniform line for inventories.

It's like weighing Thanksgiving night and using that as your weight for November. Then when you weigh yourself in mid December you might be able to say "I've actually lost weight since Thanksgiving!" While true, it doesn't tell the complete story. What did you weigh the week before Thanksgiving? What will you weigh the day after New Year's? If we want an actual gauge, we have to include more time, to get a realistic view of what's happening. If you gained 10 pounds between October 1 and December 31, that's the reality, no matter what you did for some 3 week period.

In summary, while this is good news, it must be viewed against the backdrop of the preceding month's five year peak.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kahuna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-11-10 01:21 PM
Response to Original message
9. No! Not that!!! The gloom and doomers won't like this!
:applause:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 04:34 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC