Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

U.S. court tosses sentence for millennium bomb plotter

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
JBoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-02-10 03:16 PM
Original message
U.S. court tosses sentence for millennium bomb plotter
Source: Globe and Mail

A federal appeals court says a 22-year prison sentence is too lenient for an al-Qaeda-trained terrorist convicted of plotting to bomb Los Angeles International Airport at the turn of the millennium.

A divided three-judge panel of the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals tossed out the sentence Tuesday. It also removed the Seattle trial judge from the case and assigned the re-sentencing of Ahmed Ressam to another judge.

Border agents in Washington state arrested Mr. Ressam in December 1999 after he entered the United States from Canada on a ferry with a car packed with explosives.

A judge cited Mr. Ressam’s co-operation with investigators in meting out the original sentence. But since Mr. Ressam recanted his co-operation after two years, the appeals court says he deserves a longer sentence.

Read more: http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/world/us-court-tosses-sentence-for-millennium-bomb-plotter/article1453537/



But, but,

I thought civilian courts were only interested in protecting terrorists!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Deep13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-02-10 03:19 PM
Response to Original message
1. Hmmm. I foresee the goofy 9th getting smacked down again.
U.S. v. Booker makes the Fed. Sentencing Guidelines discretionary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-02-10 03:34 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Don't see why - if the lighter sentence was predicated on the perp's
cooperation, and the court mentioned that in the sentencing, then his withholding of that cooperation would logically cause the sentence to be extended to fit the original request, probably 25-life.

You can't cut a deal and expect the state to stand by its side if you don't hold up your end.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deep13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-02-10 04:06 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. A deal with the govt. does not bind the sentencing court.
The most the state or the Feds. can do is promise to recommend a sentence. The court usually accepts a joint recommendation, but it is not required to do so. It may be that the Fed. judge thought that other factors argued for lieniency (if 22 years can be called lienient).

Anyway, I haven't read the decision so we will just have to see would the Roberts bunch rules on it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 12:58 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC