Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Baucus Nominated Girlfriend for U.S. Attorney

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-04-09 10:56 PM
Original message
Baucus Nominated Girlfriend for U.S. Attorney
Source: Roll Call

Baucus Nominated Girlfriend for U.S. Attorney
By John Stanton
Roll Call Staff
Dec. 4, 2009, 10:32 p.m.

Senate Finance Chairman Max Baucus’ office confirmed late Friday night that the Montana Democrat was carrying on an affair with his state office director, Melodee Hanes, when he nominated her to be U.S. attorney in Montana.

According to a source familiar with their relationship, Hanes and Baucus began their relationship in the summer of 2008 – nearly a year before Baucus and his wife, Wanda, formally separated in April. The Senator has since divorced his wife.

Hanes ended her employment with Baucus in the spring of this year.

Hanes, who is divorced and now lives with Baucus in the Eastern Market neighborhood of Washington, D.C., ultimately withdrew her name from consideration for the U.S. attorney position in order to move to Washington, and she now works in the Justice Department’s Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention as a counselor to the administrator.

Read more: http://www.rollcall.com/news/41188-1.html?ET=rollcall:e6074:80052652a:&st=email
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Bitwit1234 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-04-09 10:58 PM
Response to Original message
1. Call for his resignation
get this blue dog out of the senate. He is the kind of person we know is in the pocket of the insurance company...kick him out quick..the blue dirty dog.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jasi2006 Donating Member (544 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-05-09 08:27 AM
Response to Reply #1
49. This is a non-story.
Separated, divorced, girlfriend turned down job offer. Move on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-05-09 09:41 AM
Response to Reply #49
51. Abuse of power!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ingac70 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-05-09 01:04 PM
Response to Reply #49
52. No it isn't.
Fuck that slimy bastard. Apparently the Insurance lobby isn't the only one he is in bed with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
24601 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-05-09 01:36 PM
Response to Reply #49
53. BS that it's not important - Freddy robbed a bank and offered
some of the money to Mary, who refused.
- Freddy told the FBI that it's wasn't a big deal because Mary didn't participate in his crime.
- The FBI didn't give a rat's ass and Freddy still went to Jail for 20 years.

sound too far fetched to be true? here's the real story...

John, a nobody, not even a Senator, was obsessed with Jodi.
- In order to impress her, he shot the President.
- Jodi wants nothing to do with John, even after the shooting.
- It was a very big deal - the biggest deal going at the time.

While not the biggest story today, it's still a big deal almost 30 years later. Every time John or his family try for greater freedom, the government is right there opposing is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marshall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-05-09 01:44 PM
Response to Reply #49
54. Yeah, at least the girlfriend has morals
Why not have HER run for the seat?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-04-09 11:00 PM
Response to Original message
2. Uh oh
Bye Baucus!

(You rightwing asshat!)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beartracks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-04-09 11:00 PM
Response to Original message
3. Where's the facepalm smiley?
Ah, here we go.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
imdjh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-04-09 11:02 PM
Response to Original message
4. Arghhh! This is the kind of shit we have, supposedly on our team.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-04-09 11:05 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Not as bad as Gov. Sanford, but still sucky.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
notesdev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-04-09 11:09 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. It's not?
Nominating one's girlfriend to be a U.S. Attorney is pretty damn high up there on the corruption scale.

Sanford was an ethical failure but at least that failure didn't also act to corrupt our judicial system too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-04-09 11:12 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Yes, I was thinking in terms of hypocrisy not corruption. Should have been clearer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
notesdev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-04-09 11:22 PM
Response to Reply #10
18. I agree with that...
but as far as what affects you and me more in real terms, corruption is far far more damaging.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-04-09 11:23 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. Yes, and he's a Senator not a state governor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yupster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-05-09 02:46 AM
Response to Reply #5
38. Give Governor Sanford some points for
an original storyline, exotic locations, and the intriguing mix of foreign hotties and rustic Appalachia.

This new story is just a politician giving his girlfriend a job.

No originality at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-06-09 08:08 AM
Response to Reply #5
62. How do you figure it's not as bad as Sanford? Both had affairs, but only
Baucus attempted to use his position as a Senator to get "the other woman" a prestigious position.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-06-09 08:25 AM
Response to Reply #62
64. I already posted about that above.
Edited on Sun Dec-06-09 08:31 AM by Hissyspit
I meant that Sanford was more hypocritical based on his strict fundamentalist "family values" moralist facade and his attacks on homosexual civil rights, not necessarily less corrupt than Baucus.

Baucus, as far as I'm aware, began his relationship with Hanes AFTER he seperated from his wife. I didn't mean that I thought Baucus wasn't a world-class jerk and didn't do anything unethical.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UpInArms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-04-09 11:07 PM
Original message
what a chickenshit piece of garbage
these cretins just keep 'em coming, don't they?

don't let the door hit you in the ass on the way out, Max.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rwheeler31 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-04-09 11:07 PM
Response to Original message
6. This is a story?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lamp_shade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-05-09 02:17 AM
Response to Reply #6
37. That was my first thought.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-04-09 11:07 PM
Response to Original message
7. How do these politicians think they can get away with things like this?
Edited on Fri Dec-04-09 11:08 PM by karynnj
This is unethical and if it can be proven they had a relationship then - he should join his fellow Finance committee member, Ensign, dealing with an ethics investigation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
notesdev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-04-09 11:11 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Practice
This is probably minor league compared to other stuff he and his colleagues have done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salguine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-04-09 11:21 PM
Response to Reply #7
17. 'Cause they routinely DO get away with "things like this".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
clixtox Donating Member (941 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-05-09 06:29 AM
Response to Reply #7
46. Tradition! N/T
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blasphemer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-04-09 11:13 PM
Response to Original message
11. Why am I not surprised? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hell Hath No Fury Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-04-09 11:14 PM
Response to Original message
12. I am not sure which I find more disturbing --
Edited on Fri Dec-04-09 11:16 PM by Hell Hath No Fury
that Baucus attempted to get his mistress a job or that Baucus found a woman who wanted to have sex with him. :puke:

On edit:

Is this the first salvo from some pro-healthcare congresscritter/administration staff member to those Dems who are attempting to derail real heathcare reform?? Is this a horse-head-in-the-bed warning being sent??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-04-09 11:23 PM
Response to Reply #12
19. I very much doubt it
You could make the opposite comment that it is a healthcare lobbyist warning him. (As state director, I have no idea if she had involvement in his campaigns or fundraising.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhett o rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-04-09 11:14 PM
Response to Original message
13. Isnt Butkiss a republicant? Cant we give him to them? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
camera obscura Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-04-09 11:18 PM
Response to Original message
14. Baucus should resign and Schweitzer should appoint himself
It's never happening, but I can dream.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-04-09 11:20 PM
Response to Original message
15. Resign!! And let Gov. Schweitzer appoint a pro-public option Democrat to the seat!!
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John Q. Citizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-05-09 01:35 AM
Response to Reply #15
32. Why stop there? The Gov already said that if it were up to Montanan's we'd get single payer.
Baucus has his hands deep in the pockets of the health care industrial complex and most of the state knows it.

If the only problem with Baucus was his love life, it might be different.

We need Tester to support the Sanders Amendment since it lets Montanans have more choices and options to get the kind of system we want to live with.

Jon Tester needs to give Mr Bernie Sanders proposal some consideration.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-04-09 11:21 PM
Response to Original message
16. NO YOU CAN'T TALK TO A MONTANA DEMOCRAT WE FIRED THEM ALL OVER THE WEEKEND
BECAUSE THEY KEPT FUCKING UP
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RufusTFirefly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-04-09 11:24 PM
Response to Original message
21. Too late. Baucus has already accomplished his mission
And he will undoubtedly be paid handsomely for it.

More than anyone in the Senate, he succeeded in keeping single-payer off the table. (See Baucus's Raucous Caucus) The news that he is corrupt (gee, what a shock!) comes too late to be relevant.

Look for Baucus to star as a lobbyist for some facet of the health care industrial complex. Following in the footsteps of Billy Tauzin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-04-09 11:33 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. Nope. Baucus failed to thwart a public option. He failed, and
the bill still can be improved upon.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RufusTFirefly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-04-09 11:54 PM
Response to Reply #22
26. Ok. If you say so. I'll keep clapping my hands and believing in fairies
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-06-09 08:15 AM
Response to Reply #21
63. I doubt single payer was ever really destined for the table, in the Senate or anywhere..
Edited on Sun Dec-06-09 08:17 AM by No Elephants
HR 676 was introduced in 2003 and had about a hundred co-sponsors. It never even made it to the Congressional Budget Office. Obama campaigned on public option, not single payer. Etc.

Not trying to defend POS Backus, here, but I don't think we can blame him for the demise of single payer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aramchek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-04-09 11:36 PM
Response to Original message
23. out with the Baucus, in with the New!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bozita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-04-09 11:42 PM
Response to Original message
24. When Max goes down, I want him wearing his NASCAR uniform with all the appropriately-sized decals.
Max is a money whore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-04-09 11:44 PM
Response to Original message
25. Sen. Vitter calls for Baucus resignation
:rofl: kidding :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Turbineguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-04-09 11:59 PM
Response to Original message
27. So does this mean
that if I nominate a Woman to take over my job I must be having an affair with her? I mean I'd hate to ruin what little reputation I have and not get any nookie out of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeSwiss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-05-09 12:32 AM
Response to Original message
28. I, for one, am glad that at least......
...there are no diapers involved here. Now GO! Max.



Max and Melodee sittin' in a tree......

- K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mcablue Donating Member (625 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-05-09 12:35 AM
Response to Original message
29. He should face an ethics rebuke
That's favoritism and conflict of interest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-05-09 06:20 AM
Response to Reply #29
45. Well, if Bacchus (snigger) is acting like a Republicon...
Edited on Sat Dec-05-09 06:49 AM by SpiralHawk
and expressing republicon family values

Then he should get the same punishment republicons mete out to their tRaNsgReSSorS: A Standing Ovation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MilesColtrane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-05-09 01:00 AM
Response to Original message
30. Strip him of the chair.
Threaten impeachment, then cut a deal to just censure him IF he gets on board with the Congressional Democratic majority's position on all legislation.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
24601 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-05-09 02:00 PM
Response to Reply #30
55. No such thing as impeachment for Members of Congress. The
accurate process is expulsion.

Impeachment applies to the Executive and Judicial Branches.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MilesColtrane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-05-09 02:55 PM
Response to Reply #55
58. Since there's been no amendment or Supreme Court decision specifically stating...
that a Senator is not a "civil officer of the United States", the House did, and could impeach one again.

Of course, the Senate would likely refuse the trial, or dismiss the charges again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
24601 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-06-09 12:01 AM
Response to Reply #58
60. By what fiction would a senator ever be "civil"? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MilesColtrane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-06-09 01:38 AM
Response to Reply #60
61. A Capraesque fiction?
Edited on Sun Dec-06-09 02:09 AM by MilesColtrane


You are right.

Senators are not civil officers.

I guess that makes the Presidential Succession Act of 1947 unconstitutional.

I wonder why no one's ever taken that to court.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Miss Authoritiva Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-05-09 01:14 AM
Response to Original message
31. Goodness!
What is it about DC? Less than ordinary looking -- some might not uncharitably say homely -- persons get elected or appointed or staffed or whatever and bam! they start farkin' up a storm.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CreekDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-05-09 01:42 AM
Response to Original message
33. Well, based on this news, I'm guessing someone in the health care industry is now blowing him
:wtf: :banghead:

:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-05-09 01:43 AM
Response to Original message
34. Baucus is after a job
He'll never be elected. Denny Rehburg will run against him and win easily. Only chance we have to keep that seat is if Brian Schweitzer runs for Senate, and he just might.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hubert Flottz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-05-09 02:06 AM
Response to Original message
35. K&R
Maxed out!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Plucketeer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-05-09 02:09 AM
Response to Original message
36. Bye-Bye Red Dog!
:hi:"Buh-bye!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-05-09 03:35 AM
Response to Original message
39. Baucus Nominated Girlfriend for Post, Aide Says
Source: New York Times

Filed at 1:09 a.m. ET

HELENA, Mont. (AP) -- A spokesman for U.S. Sen. Max Baucus says the Montana Democrat was in a romantic relationship with the woman he nominated for U.S. attorney.

Spokesman Ty Matsdorf says Baucus and his former state office director Melodee Hanes began the relationship in the summer of 2008. Baucus nominated Hanes for the U.S. attorney post last March, but she later withdrew her name.

Read more: http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/2009/12/05/us/AP-US-Baucus-Girlfriend-Nominated.html?_r=1&hp



Nothing more at the link -- this is it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
keroro gunsou Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-05-09 03:35 AM
Response to Reply #39
40. whatta maroon
seriously.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CreekDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-05-09 03:35 AM
Response to Reply #39
41. This doesn't change my opinion of him
I already thought he was an ass. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-05-09 03:35 AM
Response to Reply #41
42. Ha! Ditto. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jack Rabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-05-09 03:35 AM
Response to Reply #39
43. Boughtkus in a romantic relationship?
Well, it's nice to know he doesn't sleep with only health insurance execs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
havocmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-05-09 03:35 AM
Response to Reply #39
44. Max's spokesman blew the whistle on this?
:rofl: Have always figured he had problems dealing effectively with his staff. Years of calling them make me think none of them are happy in their work. They certainly aren't constructive in communication with us lowly constituents. I have yet have one be anything but curt and I am professional and very nice when I call.

That kind of attitude comes from the top. Max doesn't care about anybody but Max and it shows in so many ways. While I wish him no ill, I know a couple of Montana horses I would like to see him try to ride.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FlyByNight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-05-09 06:38 AM
Response to Original message
47. Corrupt to the core
Does Congress actually wonder why their approval ratings are so damn low?

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hubert Flottz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-05-09 07:37 AM
Response to Original message
48. Did anybody check his diaper?
Edited on Sat Dec-05-09 07:42 AM by Hubert Flottz
Or check to see if he was wanted out West for gerbil rustling or anything?(Better check out his stance)

Edit...Maybe Chuck Ghastly was blackmailing the good senator when he took sides with the GOPers in his committee.(perhaps his political immunity was compromised by this black cloud hanging over him?)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Algorem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-05-09 08:38 AM
Response to Original message
50. so whut he makes her buy all her own bandaids and stuff.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mstinamotorcity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-05-09 02:01 PM
Response to Original message
56. He is not the first
to have a relationship with a member of his team. But remember falling like dominoes. This is what we want for those who try to stand on that moral high ground to be knocked down a peg or two.This is the people saying keep playing around with us and you will be exposed. No it may not seem important to some of us but every time something comes out about one of these politicians it hurts them in the polls. and thats what count. Now all it takes is for a good candidate to run against him.And don't forget puritanical America, whether he was separated when he and old girl hooked up it doesn't matter,the papers were not signed.And maybe the ethics committee may have a little something to say about offering your girlfriend a job while you are Senator.The only thing i can say that was smart about what he has done is that he didn't have to go to Argentina or a public restroom to find luv:rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoapBox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-05-09 02:19 PM
Response to Original message
57. Contact him HERE and tell him your opinion
You can contact his offices and tell him what you think! Take your pick of offices; he has lots:

http://baucus.senate.gov/?p=contact

Washington
511 Hart Senate Office Bldg.
Washington, D.C. 20510
(202) 224-2651 (Office)
(202) 224-9412 (Fax)

1. Billings
222 North 32nd St, Ste 100
Billings, MT 59101
(406) 657-6790

2. Bozeman
Federal Building
32 East Babcock, Ste 114
Bozeman, MT 59715
(406) 586-6104

3. Butte
27 N. Wyoming St, Ste A
Butte, MT 59701
(406) 782-8700

4. Glendive
122 West Towne St
Glendive, MT 59330
(406) 365-7002

5. Great Falls
113 3rd St North
Great Falls, MT 59401
(406) 761-1574

6. Helena
Empire Block
30 West 14th St, Ste 206
Helena, MT 59601
(406) 449-5480

7. Kalispell
8 Third Street East
Kalispell, MT 59901
(406) 756-1150

8. Missoula
280 E. Front St, Ste 100
Missoula, MT 59802
(406) 329-3123
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-05-09 03:18 PM
Response to Reply #57
59. done. here is what I wrote:
As Chair of the Senate Finance Committee, I think it is shameful that you obstructed efforts to ensure healthcare for so many working class people while you and your staff have benefitted from healthcare lobbyists:

"Lobbying disclosure filings for the first quarter of 2009 reveal that five of Baucus’ former staffers currently work for a total of twenty-seven different organizations that are either in the health care or insurance sector or have a noted interest in the outcome. "

"In 2008, Baucus received $1,148,775 from the health sector and $285,850 from the insurance sector. For his career he has received $2,797,381 from the health sector and $1,170,313 from the insurance sector."


SOURCE: Sunlight Foundation

Now today comes word that you abused your position of power by attempting to have your girlfriend appointed to the Montana US Attorney position.

Perhaps you have served too long and now represent your own self interests over those of the people you are elected to serve. You should be ashamed!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
New Dawn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-06-09 08:43 PM
Response to Original message
65. Typical (laughably corrupt) right-winger
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 04:53 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC