Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Ex-Gitmo inmates ask Supreme Court to declare them ‘persons’

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-24-09 05:43 PM
Original message
Ex-Gitmo inmates ask Supreme Court to declare them ‘persons’
Source: Raw Story


Ex-Gitmo inmates ask Supreme Court to declare them ‘persons’

By Stephen C. Webster

Published: August 24, 2009


Attorneys for four prior Guantánamo Bay prisoners have filed a second petition with the U.S. Supreme Court, seeking a review of a lower court’s decision that foreign nationals held in the prison not “persons” and have no Constitutional rights.

On behalf of Ruhal Ahmed, Shafiq Rasul, Asif Iqbal and Jamal Al-Harith, all of whom have since been freed without charge, attorneys filed a similar brief with the Supreme Court earlier this year. The court granted the request, knocking a lower court’s decision that they were not “persons,” had no Constitutional rights and were not protected from torture or religious persecution.

The decision was sent back to the District of Colombia Circuit Court of Appeals for reconsideration. Upon review, the D.C. court essentially restated its ruling, maintaining there were no such protections for the men, who were never proved to have committed any crimes related to terrorism or otherwise, and that government officials who allegedly ordered and carried out their torture were immune to prosecution.

The Supreme Court’s decision to remand the D.C. court’s first ruling was a legal rebuke to the extraordinary military justice system set up by President George W. Bush to try “enemy combatants” seized as part of the government’s “war on terrorism.”

Read more: http://rawstory.com/08/news/2009/08/24/ex-gitmo-inmates-ask-supreme-court-to-declare-them-persons/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-24-09 05:44 PM
Response to Original message
1. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chemisse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-24-09 06:16 PM
Response to Original message
2. What a step up that would be
To be considered a 'person.'

What have we become for this to be a serious request?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Piewhacket Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-24-09 09:10 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. Indeed. Shades of Bicentennial Man.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-24-09 06:17 PM
Response to Original message
3. They think they're just as good as corporations now, do they?
Well, forget that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
puebloknot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-24-09 07:53 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. What cheek! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Umbral Donating Member (969 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-25-09 12:40 AM
Response to Reply #3
9. Maybe they should file Articles of Incorporation instead. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pleah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-24-09 06:27 PM
Response to Original message
4. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
puebloknot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-24-09 07:55 PM
Response to Original message
6. Shades of Standing Bear! From the book "Bury My Heart at Wounded Knee" ...
... there is a chapter called "Standing Bear Becomes a Person." How do we know? A high court grudgingly said so -- even though his relatives had been in America a *lot* longer than the magistrate's relatives had been!

Go figure! "All men are created equal," and like that!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-24-09 10:39 PM
Response to Original message
8. k i c k
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe Bacon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-25-09 07:12 AM
Response to Original message
10. Fat chance with this court
They will go down 5-4 and 19th Century Fox will have an whorergasm over Sotamayor being in the minority.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
damntexdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-25-09 02:41 PM
Response to Original message
11. Sorry, the SCOTUS only thinks that corporations are persons.
But a 5-4 majority might grant some relief here -- or might not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-25-09 05:59 PM
Response to Original message
12. We are every bit as good as a corporation! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 09:24 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC