Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush, Pope Nominated for Nobel Peace

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
smirkymonkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-04 07:27 PM
Original message
Bush, Pope Nominated for Nobel Peace
By DOUG MELLGREN, Associated Press Writer (1 hour, 6 minutes ago)

OSLO, Norway - "President Bush, Pope John Paul II and the two U.N. officials at the heart of the effort to find weapon of mass destruction in Iraq (news - web sites) are among the nominees for the 2004 Nobel Peace Prize.

Tuesday's nominating deadline brought the number of candidates for the prestigious prize to 194 — 50 organizations and 144 individuals, said Geir Lundestad, secretary of the secretive awards committee. The winner of the $1.3 million award will be announced in mid-October....



This year, those nominated include Bush and British Prime Minister Tony Blair (news - web sites), French President Jacques Chirac, former Czech President Vaclav Havel, the pope, the European Union (news - web sites), former chief U.N. weapons inspector Hans Blix and Mohamed ElBaradei, who still heads the International Atomic Energy Agency.



Sen. Richard Lugar and former Sen. Sam Nunn were nominated for their program to dismantle nuclear weapons left over from the Soviet Union."


I cannot believe this! Why not nominate Mel Gibson already?

What I'd like to know is who is doing the nominating?? How can the self-proclaimed "War President" be nominated for a Nobel Peace Prize??

Excuse me now, I have to go hurl :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
kalian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-04 07:29 PM
Response to Original message
1. And you're not kidding....
Un-friggin-believable... :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
54anickel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-04 07:30 PM
Response to Original message
2. Oh for Crissake, someone has their head up their butt, or Shrubs! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pale_Rider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-04 07:30 PM
Response to Original message
3. From the BBC ...
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/1801773.stm

UK Prime Minister Tony Blair and US President George W Bush have been nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize by a Norwegian politician.
Harald Tom Nesvik, a member of the right-wing Party for Progress, said that he had nominated the two world leaders for fighting terrorism and promoting world peace.


As the article points out, its extremely unlikely that the dynamic duo will win.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smirkymonkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-04 07:41 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. Obviously, Norway has a problem
with idiot politicians as well. Isn't there a lot of OIL in Norway?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pale_Rider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-04 07:45 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. Yep, alot of oil and gas ...
... and also heavily into telecom and shipping interests as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MagicEye Donating Member (3 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-04 10:03 PM
Response to Reply #9
29. And wasn't the head of Norway who just declared....
 open season on Whale hunting!  

UUUGGGHH! 

excuse me while I just go chop my head off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-04 08:23 PM
Response to Reply #3
18. not 'will win' ...
but "didn't win". That BBC article is dated 2002.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FlashHarry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-04 07:32 PM
Response to Original message
4. No surprise. He was nominated before. No chance in hell. N/T
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saigon68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-04 08:30 PM
Response to Reply #4
21. CHIMPANZEE McSHRUB = No Chance
After all he's only killed 30,000 or so Iraqis.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSparkle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-04 07:32 PM
Response to Original message
5. Chirac est mon choix!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saigon68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-04 08:50 PM
Response to Reply #5
24. Chirac, oui naturellement, il est un chef qui a dit la vérité.
Je vote Chirac
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uber Llama Donating Member (103 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-04 07:34 PM
Response to Original message
6. How can you make up such an aweful lie?
Have I fallen down the Rabbit Hole? That is the most Carrollian thing I have ever heard! Here comes a Hookah-smoking caterpiller! I can't see straight! should I kill myself now? Why don't they nominate Orwell's Big Brother, Minitrue obviously chooses who is nominated?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patricia92243 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-04 07:36 PM
Response to Original message
7. I think I'm going to spit up!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal Veteran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-04 07:40 PM
Response to Original message
8. In other news..Critics hail Gigli as a masterpiece...
...and predict that the movie will go on to win many Oscars.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-04 07:42 PM
Response to Original message
10. Yeah, and, Charles Manson was beatified for cannonization...
makes as much sense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
central scrutinizer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-04 07:48 PM
Response to Original message
12. precedent is already set
Henry Kissinger, the ole carpet bomber hisself, won the Nobel Peace Prize in 1973, prompting Tom Lehrer to declare that satire was dead since it couldn't top that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mikimouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-04 08:12 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. Maybe Henry was trying to follow Lehrer's song about...
Poisoning Pigeons in the Park? Or perhaps emulating The Old Dope Peddler?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wjittermoss Donating Member (80 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-04 07:58 PM
Response to Original message
13. Both of these nominations are ridiculous!!
I am not quite sure which one is the more ridiculous!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shtinkycat Donating Member (126 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-04 08:00 PM
Response to Original message
14. unbelievable!
Did I nap and wake up in 1984?? War is Peace?? Please reassure me that he has NO chance of being awarded.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smirkymonkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-04 09:03 PM
Response to Reply #14
25. That's how I feel...like
I am going mad, or is it that the world is completely mad. Honestly, I don't know if I can take much more. My personal sense of reality has become so warped that I feel as though I have lost my bearings.

Hearing about things like this make everything seem meaningless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PaDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-04 08:15 PM
Response to Original message
16. There's NO way
they can put that puke up on the same ladder as the pope! What an insult!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fujiyama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-04 08:15 PM
Response to Original message
17. Remember...
Yasser Arafat and Henry Kissinger won that worthless award.

It's meaningless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
erpowers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-04 08:35 PM
Response to Reply #17
22. I disagree
The award is not worthless. It is true that some of the people who get the award do not deserve it, but it is good to honor people who try to promote peace. It is extremely sickening that Bush was nominated, but you have to understand who he was nominated by, some right-winger from Norway. Also you must take into account when he was nominated. I think it came about in 2002. So at that time he seem like he might actually be fighting a war on terror. Since then just about everybody knows the truth. I doubt he will ever be nominated again. If it happens again and he wins then I might be willing to say the award is worthless, but for now it still has meaning just think of Jimmy Carter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WarNoMore Donating Member (530 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-04 10:42 PM
Response to Reply #17
32. You took my response
to the tee.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Darranar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-04 08:25 PM
Response to Original message
19. War is Peace. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mumon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-04 08:28 PM
Response to Original message
20. Why not nominate Saddam Hussein?
I kept thinking about the lady who won for best actress at the Oscars: she should have thanked Aileen Wurnos, because without her, she wouldn't have been able to do the movie...

So, if they're going to nominate Bush, they should share the award with Saddam Hussein. Two peas in a pod.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Manix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-04 08:43 PM
Response to Original message
23. A warmonger for a Peace prize? Are they nuts!!
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
primavera Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-04 09:23 PM
Response to Original message
26. No doubt nominated by Karl Rove...
Who does get to nominate candidates for the Nobel Peace Prize? One would have thought that the humiliation of being so soundly rebuffed last year would have made whomever came up with this hair-brained nomination think twice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PartyPooper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-04 09:30 PM
Response to Original message
27. The Nobel "Piece Prize" goes to Junior.
He's the biggest piece of s*** the world has seen in the past 50 years!

:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enki23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-04 09:58 PM
Response to Original message
28. again?
big deal. it's not like he'll win.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Davis_X_Machina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-04 10:34 PM
Response to Original message
30. Don't get your panties in a twist....
Edited on Tue Mar-02-04 10:40 PM by Davis_X_Machina
...literally thousands of people can nominate for the Nobel Peace Prize:

From their website:

Right to submit proposals for the Nobel Peace Prize, based on the principle of competence and universality, shall by statute be enjoyed by:

  1. Members of national assemblies and governments of states;
  2. Members of international courts;
  3. University rectors; professors of social sciences, history, philosophy, law and theology; directors of peace research institutes and foreign policy institutes;
  4. Persons who have been awarded the Nobel Peace Prize;
  5. Board members of organizations who have been awarded the Nobel Peace Prize;
  6. Active and former members of the Norwegian Nobel Committee; (proposals by members of the Committee to be submitted no later than at the first meeting of the Committee after February 1) and
  7. Former advisers appointed by the Norwegian Nobel Institute.


One right-wing nutcase in the Norwegian parliament nominates Bush every year....big deal.

Tom DeLay and Instapundit are both eligible nominators, by the way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smirkymonkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-04 11:02 PM
Response to Reply #30
33. I don't have my "panties in a twist"
I just think it is absolutely bizarre that someone could nominate a person who is the biggest threat to world peace that humanity has ever known.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Davis_X_Machina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-04 11:14 PM
Response to Reply #33
34. When you've got tens of thousands of nominators...
...and two per cent of the general population is stark raving mad, it would be remarkable only if Bush were not nominated.

I'm trying to get my state rep to nominate Pedro Martinez for defusing the threat to peace and stability posed by an incensed and out-of-control Don (the Gerbil) Zimmer last fall.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smirkymonkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-03-04 10:09 PM
Response to Reply #34
37. Only 2%?? I am beginning to think that
it's more like 60% to 70% of the population is stark raving mad. The world just gets more and more insane every day. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MikeGalos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-04 10:39 PM
Response to Original message
31. Calm down
Anybody can be nominated. The requirements for running for dog catcher are higher than the Nobel nomination for the Peace prize (unlike the science prizes). All it takes is a written nomination by somebody who is considered qualified (and for the Peace prize that's almost anybody involved in any political or charitable organization). Oh, and you can't nominate yourself.

Now, getting the award is a very different matter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dirk39 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-04 11:22 PM
Response to Original message
35. Where's Saddam, where's latecomer Louis-Jodel Chamblain,
where's Guy Philippe?
They're not fair and balanced.

Now I know, what I say on judgement day: I wasn't nominated for the Nobel Peace Price in 2004.

Dirk
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-04 11:22 PM
Response to Original message
36. two of my favorites!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SiobhanClancy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-03-04 10:11 PM
Response to Original message
38. Has Ian Paisley been nominated too?
It would make as much sense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barkley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-03-04 10:16 PM
Response to Original message
39. Know Justice, Know Peace!
Chief U.N. weapons inspector Hans Blix and Mohamed ElBaradei, heads the International Atomic Energy Agency are my favorites.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 03:56 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC