Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

GOP Senators: Bipartisan Health Deal Tougher Now

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Purveyor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-04-09 02:09 PM
Original message
GOP Senators: Bipartisan Health Deal Tougher Now
Source: Associated Press

WASHINGTON (AP) — Republican senators say chances of reaching a bipartisan deal to overhaul health care dimmed after President Barack Obama issued a letter strongly supporting a new public health insurance plan.

A public plan that would compete with private insurers is opposed by nearly all Republicans. Until Wednesday, the administration had been treading lightly on the issue while emphasizing hopes for a bipartisan bill.

That changed when Obama released a letter to two key Senate Democrats saying he believed strongly in the need for a new public plan.

Senator Mike Enzi of Wyoming, top Republican on the Senate's health committee, said Thursday that the letter hurts prospects for a bipartisan deal. Other Republican senators made similar comments.

Read more: http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5gap9wCaolRYguYQesA2i2Yr98yLgD98K16Q00
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
villager Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-04-09 02:10 PM
Response to Original message
1. "Oh -- you meant something not pre-approved by insurance companies?"
"Well then, not so much..."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dgibby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-04-09 02:28 PM
Response to Original message
2. What the hell are they worried about?
Any public plan short of single payer will NEVER compete with the private sector. Ain't. gonna. happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uberblonde Donating Member (993 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-04-09 02:37 PM
Response to Original message
3. Reform by definition would exclude Republicans!
Am I right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sybylla Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-04-09 02:49 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Good point. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old and In the Way Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-04-09 02:38 PM
Response to Original message
4. I'm shocked.
BTW, when will every Congressional Republican give up their taxpayer financed public healthcare plan in favor of the private sector plans? I'd love a Democrat to propose just such a bill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sybylla Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-04-09 02:48 PM
Response to Original message
5. Go ahead, repugs, vote against it.
Let's see how many of you get re-elected next year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NC_Nurse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-04-09 03:25 PM
Response to Original message
7. Like it was EVER going to be easy. They are so FOS. Losers. Let's just hope
they don't act defeated in order to get some lame ass compromise bill passed disguised as real reform.

They've got the DINO's to help them with that, I'm afraid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
november3rd Donating Member (653 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-04-09 03:27 PM
Response to Original message
8. Too Bad
They get to vote against the bill and still join the public option when it's passed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmondine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-04-09 03:35 PM
Response to Original message
9. Pass it without them, let them filibuster if they can...
... here's some rope, guys. Do what you will.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-04-09 03:47 PM
Response to Original message
10. An optional public plan makes perfect sense.
The private corporations can make a profit on healthcare. Why not the public?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
damntexdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-04-09 04:35 PM
Response to Original message
11. Yeah, bipartisanship of all types is tougher -- so long as there are Republicans.
But it's really impossible if Democrats are going to insist on elements of a plan that might render it actually effective.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wednesdays Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-04-09 10:10 PM
Response to Original message
12. K&R
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blasphemer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-04-09 10:26 PM
Response to Original message
13. Sounds good to me
What with Obama's letter and Coleman finally being ready to throw in the towel, it's time to get down to business and stop pretending like the GOP actually cares about this country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Faryn Balyncd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-04-09 11:40 PM
Response to Original message
14. I'm sorry, Mr. Enzi, but any "reform" that does not meet Obama's minimal requirements (Public Option
Edited on Thu Jun-04-09 11:42 PM by Faryn Balyncd

......and Open Enrollment) is NOT a reform at all.


Any such pseudo-"reform" such as mandatory insurance with no public option (Wyden plan) OR a crippled public option in which the private plans use pre-existing condition exclusions to deprive Americans of choice while dumping all the unprofitable patients into the public plan (so that insurance corporations can continue raping the healthy for fat profits) NEED TO BE DEFEATED.


We won't settle for garbage that makes true reform more difficult.





K & R













Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
western mass Donating Member (718 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-04-09 11:59 PM
Response to Original message
15. We don't WANT a bipartisan health deal
Keep their filthy GOP fingers out of this bill, period.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-05-09 02:03 AM
Response to Original message
16. Good. The vast majority of Republicans in Congress have nothing good to add to the bill. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wryter2000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-05-09 11:43 AM
Response to Original message
17. Oh, drat
And they were perfectly willing to cooperate before this. There goes the bipartisanship...

:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pscot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-05-09 11:57 AM
Response to Original message
18. Bullshit
Their only deal was, "No Deal".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-05-09 02:05 PM
Response to Original message
19. Fine.
They don't want it to be a bipartisan effort? Then we'll make it a PARTISAN effort, motherfuckers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-05-09 04:28 PM
Response to Original message
20. If there's no public option, they shouldn't even bother.
The Grand No Party carps about having a choice of insurance plans, but they don't want to give us the choice that we want. They'd rather allow a minimum wage insurance clerk to come between a patient and their doctor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WhiteTara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-06-09 11:23 AM
Response to Original message
21. like there would have been
bi-partisanship anyway. Lame-asshats they are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 05:48 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC