|
from corpo/fascist media.
"...shutting down press because they don't agree with chavez"
Prove it. As far as I know--from reading numerous reports, both corpo/fascist and alternative media, hostile to Chavez and not, Chavez denied a license renewal to ONE STATION, because of their active role in the 2002 coup attempt. It was a perfectly lawful thing for the government to do; many governments deny licenses to use the public airwaves with far less cause than the Chavez government had. How is that "shutting down press"? It affected no other TV stations, and no newspapers--and there are plenty of both in Venezuela, with the rightwing more than amply represented.
"taking private property from people for being 'enemies of the revolution'"
Please give examples. And do you mean corporations, or ordinary people? The Venezuelan Constitution protects private property, and requires that the government compensate owners for any private property that the government acquires for its own purposes (road construction, land reform, etc.). I know of no large-scale government acquisitions of private property in Venezuela, and no such acquisitions that have not been compensated. (The land reform program has involved mostly government lands, thus far.) So, I repeat, please give examples, and it would be good to have sufficient examples to judge whether it merits such a general accusation as you have made. And please be apprised: corporations are not people; they are government-licensed business consortiums that are permitted to do business in a country, if they obey the laws and the terms of the license. Our government takes individuals' homes, cars and other properties on the mere allegation of drug use, possession or trade. The Chavez government does no such thing, that I have ever heard of. It doesn't take individuals' property--but it has taken property that Exxon Mobil alleged that it owned, for instance, because Exxon Mobil refused to operate under the laws and terms set down by the government. Corporations have no rights not granted to them by "the people" of a sovereign, democratic country, and cannot be permitted to be scofflaws. They will destroy your country, if you let them--as is happening here.
"...aligning himself with regimes like Ahmadinejad's theo-fascist little 'republic'"
Chavez is aligned with the Bolivarian democracies, and other leftist and center-left democracies in South and Central America. He is most closely aligned with Bolivia, Ecuador, Argentina, Brazil, Paraguay, Uruguay and Nicaragua. He is closest friends and allies with Lula da Silva, president of Brazil, Cristina Fernandez, president of Argentina, Evo Morales of Bolivia, and Rafael Correa of Ecuador. He is merely trading with Iran; also, with Russia, China, France, England, Norway and other countries, including every Latin American country. It is simply not true that he is "aligned" with "Ahmadinejad's theo-fascist little 'republic.'" Obama trades with Saudi Arabia. Does that mean that Obama is "aligned with" Saudi Arabia's theo-fascist monarchy? Further, Venezuela is a member of OPEC. It is perfectly appropriate that Venezuela should have diplomatic and trade relations with other members of OPEC, as it does with MERCOSUR, UNASUR and ALBA--South American trade groups. Why do you mention ONE COUNTRY that Venezuela has trade relations with, and no others, and none of the countries that Venezuela is actually aligned with?
|