Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Stanford, flamboyant Texan, faces media glare (another $50 Billion Ponzi?)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
UpInArms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-14-09 07:59 AM
Original message
Stanford, flamboyant Texan, faces media glare (another $50 Billion Ponzi?)
Source: Reuters

BOSTON (Reuters) - Just three weeks ago, Allen Stanford was listed as one of the 100 most influential people in British sport. Now, the Texas billionaire is at the center of the latest investigation by Wall Street regulators.

<snip>

The tall, mustached Texan is facing the glare of the media anew as his $50 billion investment operation, Stanford Group Co, comes under investigation by U.S. regulators at a time when Bernard Madoff's suspected $50 billion fraud has put regulators and investors on high-alert for any whiff of wrongdoing.

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority are examining sales of certificates of deposit in its affiliated, Antigua-based offshore bank and the steady, above-average returns those investments pay, sources say.

<snip>

Months before the tournament, he landed a gold-plated helicopter at Lord's Cricket Ground in London, often called the home of British cricket, and unveiled a case packed with $20 million in cash. British media were merciless, calling the Texan "gaudy" and an affront to English sensibilities.

Read more: http://www.reuters.com/article/businessNews/idUSTRE51C66O20090214?feedType=RSS&feedName=businessNews&sp=true
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-14-09 08:09 AM
Response to Original message
1. That's what it looks like.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheCoxwain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-14-09 08:13 AM
Response to Original message
2. Actually - He is Sir Allen Stanford - He has been knighted by the Queen

OOPS!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueCollar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-14-09 08:30 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. not quite...
Knighted in 2006 by the Antiguan authorities rather than the Queen of England, he is known by islanders as simply "Sir Allen" -- an ardent cricket enthusiast whose financial muscle has helped to rehabilitate West Indian cricket.

http://www.reuters.com/article/businessNews/idUSTRE51C66O20090214?feedType=RSS&feedName=businessNews&sp=true
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robbien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-14-09 08:41 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. Not knighted by the Queen. He got his bought and paid for Antiguan lackies to benight him.

So the Sir in "Sir" Allen should have quotes around it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fasttense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-14-09 08:39 AM
Response to Original message
4. And the "free" market scams continue unabated. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lucky Luciano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-14-09 08:41 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Well...he is not guilty yet, but certainly worthy of investigation
based on what I have read.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robbien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-14-09 08:52 AM
Response to Original message
7. Stanford: Your Daily Dose of WTF
Felix Salmon over at Portfolio has been keeping an eye on the Stanford shenanigans:
http://www.portfolio.com/views/blogs/market-movers/2009/02/14/stanford-your-daily-dose-of-wtf


FINRA and Florida regulators began investigating Stanford Financial and its banks within the past several months. But people familiar with the probes say the SEC investigation goes back at least three years and possibly longer.

It's all well and good being meticulous. But the amount invested in SIB CDs has increased by billions of dollars over the course of the period the SEC has been investigating the bank. Anybody who bought a Stanford CD within the past three years has every reason to be furious at the SEC.

But it gets even better: a certain Lawrence J. De Maria filed a lawsuit in 2006 specifically alleging that Stanford "was operating a Ponzi scheme or pyramid scheme". De Maria got bought off with an out-of-court settlement in December 2007; law enforcement more generally didn't seem to care in the slightest, either before or after the case was settled.


----------

Almost a mirror image of the Madoff fiasco.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-14-09 12:49 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. Please tell me he frittered away all the excess oil profits. Pretty please.
There is nothing I want more than to hear Exxon execs screeching for regulation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-14-09 11:01 AM
Response to Original message
8. "A gold-plated helicopter" ??

I don't think I'd invest money with someone that wasteful.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deadmessengers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-14-09 01:33 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. That sounds like hyperbolic bullshit to me.
Gold is a very dense, heavy metal - a gold-plated helicopter is unlikely to be able to fly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-14-09 03:43 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. No, it wouldn't be made of gold

Gold is too soft anyway...

It would more likely be gilded - and that can be thin, although it would wear off.

I suspect it wasn't a "gold" helicopter, but it might have had some trim (door handles, lines, whatever). If it was black with some gold plating on the trim elements it'd be very good looking. Wasteful, perhaps, but probably sharp.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rainbow4321 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-14-09 11:14 AM
Response to Original message
9. His GOP/chimp connection:
Edited on Sat Feb-14-09 11:20 AM by rainbow4321
http://www.islandmix.com/backchat/f6/alan-stanford-king-antigua-george-w-bush-157014/

Bush Texas crony "Sir" R. Allen Stanford, and GOP corruption

Antigua assault by Texas billionaire now engulfing other Caribbean nations. The story about Bush Texas crony "Sir" R. Allen Stanford buying up land in Antigua and attempting to take control of Leeward Islands Air Transport (LIAT) is having repercussions beyond Antigua and Barbuda. The Prime Minister of Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Dr. Ralph Gonsalves of the Unity Labour Party, a one-time Marxist professor at the University of the West Indies who is nicknamed "Comrade Ralph," has provided details to Stanford's attempt to acquire LIAT:

-Mr. Stanford and the Stanford Financial Group Limited has given a US$55 Million loan to liquidate the liabilities of LIAT, among other things. The other things include buying out Stanford's Caribbean Star. Essentially, Caribbean Star is loaning money to LIAT to buy out Caribbean Star and pay off all of its debts as well as LIAT’s.

- The loan will be repaid to an international entity of the Stanford Financial Group. One of Stanford’s companies will be handling the Initial Public Offer (IPO). Therefore, one of Stanford many companies could easily buy the loan, which his own company is handling, i.e., Stanford would fully own LIAT under the disguise of one of his companies.


However, political leaders in Antigua and Barbuda, Barbados, and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines are already smelling a rat. WMR previously reported on Stanford's ties to Bush and the GOP and U.S. ambassador to Barbados and the Eastern Caribbean, Mary Ourisman, being a professional board member and wealthy contributor for the Bush administration. We have also learned that Stanford flew members of the U.S. Congress to Antigua on his private jet for junkets.

---------------
And:

Crooked Billionaire Pays Off Crooked Politicians-- Steals Billions?

http://downwithtyranny.blogspot.com/2009/02/crooked-billionaire-pays-offs-crooked.html

(lists pols and groups he has donated money to)



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-14-09 11:25 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. Uh Oh....Congress Critters cited by CREW...Rangel among them...
Edited on Sat Feb-14-09 11:28 AM by KoKo
:-(

Trips to Caribbean Appear to Have Broken House Rules

By Susan Crabtree, The Hill, December 17, 2008

17 Dec 2008 // For at least five of the last six years, Rep. Charles Rangel (D-N.Y.) and several other members of the Congressional Black Caucus have spent a few days each fall at a different luxurious Caribbean island resort.

The trip’s official mission is to facilitate business and diplomatic relationships between the region and the United States.

This year’s trip took place Nov. 6 to 9, the weekend after the election, on the sun-swept 10-acre Sonesta Maho Beach Resort in St. Martin. The ethics committee approved the Caribbean trip, as it has done for several years, but new information uncovered about its corporate funding raises questions about whether the trip violates a two-year-old ethics rule passed after Democrats regained the House.

The New York Carib News Foundation, a nonprofit affiliated with a newspaper geared toward the city’s Caribbean community, is listed on members’ travel disclosure documents as the trip’s sponsor.

When the nonprofit’s CEO, Karl Rodney, sought ethics committee approval for the trip, as the new rules require, he checked a box on the form certifying that the foundation “has not accepted from any other source funds earmarked directly or indirectly to finance any aspect of the trip.”

After House Democrats regained the majority on a campaign of draining the Washington swamp, they passed tougher new rules governing privately funded trips for members. The ethics rules bar corporations or other entities that employ or retain a registered lobbyist from paying for multi-day trips, either directly or indirectly.

Yet two spokeswomen for American Airlines, the largest carrier from the U.S. to the Caribbean, told The Hill that the company recently provided in-kind donations of tickets for Rangel and five other members of Congress to fly from their districts to St. Martin, a tropical island in the northeast Caribbean. According to ethics experts, the American Airlines donation of tickets for members to use for a specific trip is a clear violation of House ethics rules governing travel. American Airlines has spent more than $6 million on lobbying in the first three-quarters of this year.

“We provided in-kind support,” said Martha Pantin, a spokeswoman for American Airlines. “It was sometime in the fall when the tickets were provided to the foundation. We’ve done this for the past couple of years.”

Pantin would give neither the exact date nor an estimate of the overall cost of the tickets. She also could not say whether the tickets were sent to the members of Congress directly or provided through the foundation, nor would she provide a contact person at the nonprofit who organized and planned the trip.

A review of the foundation’s 2006 report to the IRS, the latest publicly available, shows that the nonprofit had no revenue or expenses from June 1, 2005 to May 31, 2006, even though it claimed to have sponsored a trip to St. Thomas in the Virgin Islands in the fall of 2005. According to the IRS report, the group also spent nothing on direct charitable activities, including conferences.

In 2007, Rep. Yvette Clarke (D-N.Y.) and then-Rep. Stephanie Tubbs Jones (D-Ohio), joined Rangel, Del. Donna Christensen (D-Virgin Islands), Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee (D-Texas) and Rep. Bennie Thompson (D-Miss.) at the annual conference. At the time, Tubbs Jones chaired the ethics committee.

On a form submitted to the House ethics committee, the New York Carib News Foundation describes its mission as providing “education and information about the Caribbean in the area of Business, Education, Health and Culture, Promote Good neighborly within the United States and the hemisphere.”

The form stated the members of Congress were selected “based on their demonstrated interest, expertise and assignment in the U.S. Congress.”

The trip is closely associated with the CBC; only CBC members are invited each year.

The New York Carib News referred comments to a New York-based public-relations firm, which asked for written questions but did not answer them.

Meredith McGehee, an ethics expert at the Campaign Legal Center, said the corporate sponsorships, combined with the IRS 990 form showing no money flowing through the foundation to pay for a 2005 trip, raises red flags about whether the foundation is trying to skirt the new ethics rules that Democrats imposed.


“If members of Congress are accepting these financial benefits of housing, food, airplane , the source matters,” McGehee said. “You’re not allowed to let these foundations be conduits for this money. The source of the resources for this travel becomes a critical question.”

In a brief interview last week, Rangel said the ethics committee cleared the trip, so he thought it was OK to participate.

When The Hill told Rangel about American Airlines’ donation of tickets for the trip and the New York Carib News’s 990 form showing no expenditures and no revenue, he said the onus was on the ethics committee to find out whether trip sponsors are making false statements to the panel.

“That’s for the ethics committee to investigate,” he said. “You cannot expect members of Congress to figure out how they go about doing it.”

A Rangel spokesman echoed his boss’s explanation in a written statement.

“If there is a problem with this trip, it is not with the care and attention that Congressman Rangel showed to House ethics rules and standards in making plans to attend the conference,” said Emile Milne. “Congressman Rangel complied with all House ethics rules and received the approval of the ethics committee for this trip, as the documentation clearly demonstrates. The foundation submitted the proper certification as well, so there was no reason to believe that anyone was paying for the trip besides the sponsor. Congressman Rangel made certain he complied with the rules, his staff complied with the rules, and he believed the sponsor was complying with the rules as represented to the ethics committee.”

The ethics committee, which does not comment on internal matters, did not respond to an inquiry.
McGehee argues that members are responsible for making sure trip sponsors are abiding by the House ethics rules because members should know all the intricacies of the rules best — they vote on them each year, and it’s their reputations and careers that are on the line.

“The question that is really at play here is, Are these forms filled out accurately?” she said. “And who is responsible for finding that out? The member. Privately financed travel for members of Congress is not a right. There are all kinds of groups and entities trying to buy influence with members of Congress. The burden is on the members to show why taking this trip should be permitted.”

In this instance, Rangel and the other members of Congress who participated this year were already on notice that the trip’s funding was questionable.

The New York Post published an article in mid-September about the New York Carib News trip Rangel and others took to Antigua and Barbuda last year that triggered queries about its corporate contributions.

Besides Rangel, five other CBC members traveled to St. Martin last month. The others were: Democratic Reps. Donald Payne (N.J.), Jackson Lee, Carolyn Kilpatrick (Mich.), Thompson and Christensen. Only Jackson Lee said she paid her own way for the trip this year.

Kilpatrick and Christensen said they filed the appropriate forms with the ethics committee and received its approval. Payne’s office did not respond to several calls.

Thompson, who chairs the Homeland Security Committee, also cited the ethics committee’s approval of the trip as the reason he thought it was financed properly. He said the conference helped him understand the Caribbean’s homeland security challenges.

“I learned about some of the problems that the island has in terms of port security, drugs and human smuggling,” he said.

The CBC Foundation and the trip also share several major donors, including Citigroup, Verizon and AT&T. Eric Eve, Citigroup’s vice president for global communication, sits on the CBC Foundation’s board of directors, and spoke at the conference.

At this year’s 13th annual trip, billed as a “multinational business conference,” Rangel served as the keynote speaker for the opening ceremonies and for the gala dinner and awards presentation. He also spoke alongside Dr. Compton Bourne, president of the Caribbean Development Bank, at a lunch on the topic of the “Caribbean, a solid investment.”

An invitation to the conference sent to Kilpatrick from the St. Martin government stated that the trip offers “a fine opportunity to combine business with pleasure on our island, with a wide variety of activities, a pulsating nightlife, absolutely duty-free shopping and 37 beautiful beaches to choose from.”

In its filing with the ethics committee, the New York Carib News estimated the cost of airfare at $410 and three nights’ lodging at the Sonesta Maho Beach Resort at $405, with an additional $175 for “registration/transportation.”

A search of the cost of the cheapest “supersaver” room on the hotel website, however, calculated a three-night stay at $748.68 with tax. For the same time period, a premier ocean view would run $1,157.07 and a deluxe suite king would cost $1,524.60.

Source URL:
http://www.citizensforethics.org/node/36109
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCKit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-14-09 10:27 PM
Response to Reply #10
16. Disgusting, beyond all measure.
What the hell is wrong with these people that they don't 1) believe they'll ever get busted or 2) become absolutely beholden, to a degree akin to prison bitches, of these corporations?

I expect this amateur, ignorant shit from the Republics, but it really pisses me off when they have a (D).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bertman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-14-09 02:13 PM
Response to Original message
13. Flamboyant Texan. Need anything else be said?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCKit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-14-09 10:29 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. "Gold Plated Helicopter"
I'd like to believe there are rappers with better taste. How Tackay.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bertman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-14-09 10:40 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. "How Tackay."
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-14-09 02:58 PM
Response to Original message
14. Question. I can't tell from what I've been able to Google.
But can this greedy creep crash Venezuela?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-15-09 01:50 PM
Response to Original message
19. Stanford curtails financing amid probe: report (Texas Madoff)
Source: Reuters


NEW YORK (Reuters) - Texas billionaire Allen Stanford's offshore bank, which is under federal investigation, recently curtailed financing commitments to two small firms, The Wall Street Journal reported on its Web site on Saturday, citing regulatory filings.

Stanford International Bank Ltd. of Antigua failed to provide $16 million in funding to a telecommunications firm in Florida and an Alabama health-care company said it could not complete a $62 million merger when funding fell through.

According to the healthcare firm called Emageon Inc., Stanford had planned to provide the funding to complete the deal, the Journal reported. Stanford spokesman Brian Bertsch declined to comment to the newspaper.

The new disclosures raised further questions about the activities of the off-shore bank of the Stanford Group Co's $50 billion financial empire. Investigation of Stanford's investment bank expanded to the Caribbean island of Antigua on Friday, where regulators planned to quiz executives of the offshore unit at the request of U.S. regulators.



Read more: http://www.reuters.com/article/newsOne/idUSN1526611620090215
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 11:42 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC