Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Wardrobe Mysteries Linger (store owner says it did not happen) NYT

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Nambe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-23-08 03:34 PM
Original message
Wardrobe Mysteries Linger (store owner says it did not happen) NYT
Source:

... Consider also the $4,902.45 charge at Atelier New York, a high-end men’s store, presumably for Ms. Palin’s husband, Todd, the famous First Dude.

Karlo Steel, an owner there, said he had gone through the store’s receipts for September, twice, and found no sales that matched that amount, nor any combination of sales that added up to the total. Because the store carries aggressively directional men’s wear, he caters to a small clientèle and knows most of his customers by name, as well as the history of their purchases.

When The Caucus called Mr. Steel back to ask him to also check August sales just in case, Mr. Steel said he found one purchase that came close to the amount in the campaign finance reports but said that he knew who that customer was and it certainly was not Mr. Palin. Neither was it Jeff Larson, the Republican consultant who showed up in campaign finance records as the one who footed the initial bill before being reimbursed by the R.N.C. ...

Read more: http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/10/23/wardrobe-mysteries-linger/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Lance_Boyle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-23-08 03:37 PM
Response to Original message
1. Maybe it was for Tawd's business partner, again. n/t

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TrogL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-23-08 03:38 PM
Response to Original message
2. So what was the money spent on? Hookers?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Democat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-23-08 03:46 PM
Response to Original message
3. Let's keep this scandal alive as long as possible!
Send out the investigators to find out what's really going on with this shopping spree.

And every day before the election there should be a new story about Palin's $150,000 shopping spree.

Every day!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-23-08 04:37 PM
Response to Reply #3
17. I think the American people deserve to know
Was the First Dude buying clothes from terrorists? Or anti-American haberdashers? Are his shorts unreal? We deserve answers to these burning questions, and we need them now so that the American people can make an informed choice.

What is the First Dude covering up? Are his aggressively directional clothes pointed in the right direction? And how can the American people evaluate any unsupported claim of properly directional supporters if we don't have every last scrap of information? Are they hiding something?

God damn but the jokes just write themselves, don't they? There are going to be a lot of comedians experiencing mixed feelings on November 5.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
On the Road Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-23-08 03:48 PM
Response to Original message
4. "Aggressively Directional Men’s Wear"?
What the hell is that?
:wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Critters2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-23-08 03:50 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. I wondered that, too. What the hell does that mean?
Is there gently directional men's wear?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-23-08 03:53 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. kevlar underwear with a GPS. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MilesColtrane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-24-08 11:05 AM
Response to Reply #7
35. Not sure, but I think there's a ball gag involved.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HopeHoops Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-23-08 03:53 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. Sounds like it involves red leather body suits and face masks
Maybe that's where Sarah got that jacket!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uncle Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-23-08 03:58 PM
Response to Reply #4
12. I believe it's sort of like the SNL skit when Jim Belushi stuffed everything down his pants
including the paper towel dispenser in the men's room in the hopes of impressing the ladies.

I could be wrong about this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dixiegrrrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-23-08 04:22 PM
Response to Reply #4
15. Magnetized codpieces?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GinaMaria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-24-08 09:17 AM
Response to Reply #4
30. This might help
Edited on Fri Oct-24-08 09:21 AM by GinaMaria
http://web.mac.com/ateliernewyork/iWeb/Site/YOHJI%20YAMAMOTO%20FW%202008.html

The term may be a play on the term 'fashion forward'. From the few items I looked at, the clothing seems unstructured (in a traditional tailored sense), exagerated (see the phantom of the opera like cape) and metrosexual (for lack of a better word). Too trendy to ever be worn on a campaign trail, but who knows. Anything is possible with the McInsane campaign.

This seems really odd. Take a look at the clothes. They scream NY club scene to me. WTF is going on?


On Edit:
Here's the link for the page with the capes :eyes:

http://web.mac.com/ateliernewyork/iWeb/Site/YOHJI%20YAMAMOTO%20FW%202008.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wanet Donating Member (197 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-23-08 03:49 PM
Response to Original message
5. What is "aggressively directional" men's wear?
Expensive?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wanet Donating Member (197 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-23-08 03:54 PM
Response to Reply #5
11. following some research on ask.com
It appears to be a fancy way of saying "the latest fashion"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TankLV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-23-08 09:06 PM
Response to Reply #5
26. Maybe it makes his tiny pecker bigger and point to the right or left...
I've seen the "up front and center" undies in a few ads...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hvn_nbr_2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-23-08 03:50 PM
Response to Original message
6. "Aggressively directional men's wear"
WTF is that? Pants that accommodate a "directional" codpiece?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-23-08 03:52 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Which side do you dress, Mr. Palin???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Critters2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-23-08 03:58 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. LOL!!
Directional! :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
On the Road Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-23-08 04:20 PM
Response to Reply #6
14. Maybe That's It!
You have a choice between aggressively to the left or aggressively to the right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pitohui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-23-08 04:22 PM
Response to Original message
16. the store owner is not under oath and has a duty to protect his clients
Edited on Thu Oct-23-08 04:24 PM by pitohui
if it was my store, i'd say the say thing, even if it was a lie

the only way i would admit who my customers are is if i had permission from them OR i was under oath

otherwise if britney or palin or i don't care who all shops in my store, they are going to get the privacy they expect, right?

in other words, i don't see how you can take the store owner's word for this as he would be expected to say "no" whatever the true answer

we all got mad when victoria's secret accidently leaked some of the customer list and what people bought and we're not even celebs and nobody cares! how much more so is it to be private in this case
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-23-08 04:56 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. Maybe investigators will need a warrant, but certainly the govt auditors
are within their legal rights to question receipts that don't seem legit. If the Pubs didn't buy clothes there, then the receipt was fraudulently submitted for reimbursement. This is a quick way to get fired or arrested. It's grand theft.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmowreader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-23-08 06:09 PM
Response to Original message
19. Aggressively directional men's wear? Hmm...
I found the Atelier New York website and looked at the clothes they offer. It's all this Milan Catwalk stuff...if you don't wear eyeliner on a daily basis you won't want these clothes.

I think the "aggressively directional" line means "we know the three customers who would buy this item."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FatDave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-23-08 09:05 PM
Response to Reply #19
25. Sure doesn't sound like anything you;d find in "real" America.
Sounds pretty damn fruity if you ask me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmowreader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-24-08 05:01 AM
Response to Reply #25
27. I don't think I'd call it "fruity"
No self-respecting gay man would be caught dead in these clothes. This is more "look at my unique style" shit--and it WOULD be unique style, since no one but you would wear this stuff.

After looking at the clothes on this site (http://www.ateliernewyork.com), I can safely say SOMEONE ripped off the GOP--they did NOT buy clothes for a political candidate's husband at this store.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FatDave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-24-08 09:03 AM
Response to Reply #27
28. Kee-rist!
That is some awful stuff. And I haven't seen men that skinny since I saw The Machinist. Seriously, these guys ain't gettin' their money's worth at the Chinese buffet. So skinny they have to wear snow shoes in the shower. The wind would blow them away if there was enough surface area for it to grab. Somebody should make them an aggressively directional sandwich.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoddessOfGuinness Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-23-08 06:14 PM
Response to Original message
20. Maybe it was for Sarah's jock straps
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earth mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-23-08 06:37 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. ROFL!
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-23-08 06:41 PM
Response to Original message
22. Maybe a "wardrobe malfunction" would work.
Edited on Thu Oct-23-08 06:41 PM by bemildred
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
starroute Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-23-08 06:45 PM
Response to Original message
23. "Aggressively directional" usually refers to sound effects
Googling mainly turns up references to things like movie soundtracks and surround sound. "If you've been content with 2-channel Surround for your DVD viewing, let me tell you, you are definitely missing a full half of DVD's potential. The opening scenes of The Blues Brothers, in the prison, are aggressively, and I mean aggressively, directional; in the scene where Jake and Elwood are trapped by Carrie Fisher in the sewer, the dripping of the sewer is all around you and when she shoots that machine gun at Jake and Elwood, it's amazing."

Oh, here's a fashion reference: "Yet off the catwalk, the collection is neither intimidating nor aggressively directional. Instead Freud has delivered a truly wearable, urbane and pleasurable ready to wear wardrobe for the new Biba customer."

And here it is used about Beckham's hair: "A bigger disappointment, for aesthetically minded soccer fans, was that Beckham's tresses - normally the beau ideal of the soccer world's array of aggressively directional haircuts - were just tired. His previous dos have included a frosted fauxhawk, blond cornrows and a confection of rooster's peaks, but on Saturday Beckham's hair was, like his game, neatly prostrate and minimally styled. Mere gel, in soccer, is a letdown."

So -- are we all suitably illuminated now? (And don't tell me what a fauxhawk might be. I really don't think I want to know.)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynnTheDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-23-08 09:00 PM
Response to Original message
24. Theft? Fraud? Does the RNC care what's done with their donors' money?
Do republican donors care?

I would...but that's just me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GinaMaria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-24-08 09:07 AM
Response to Original message
29. There's something fishy about the accouting here
What are they hiding? and how bad is it that they would rather take heat for clothing expenses than what it really is?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zelta gaisma Donating Member (220 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-24-08 09:23 AM
Response to Original message
31. Oh I know ! I know!
aggressively directional men’s wear <---- clothes a dominatrix makes her bottom-boy wear ?!

ok feel free to ignore me I haven't had enough coffee yet and that phrase sent my mind straight into the gutter where it giggles chortles and dies laughing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GinaMaria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-24-08 09:24 AM
Response to Original message
32. Web site. See for yourself
http://web.mac.com/ateliernewyork/iWeb/Site/YOHJI%20YAMAMOTO%20FW%202008.html

aggressively directional men’s wear

The term may be a play on the term 'fashion forward'. From the few items I looked at, the clothing seems unstructured (in a traditional tailored sense), exagerated (see the phantom of the opera like cape) and metrosexual (for lack of a better word). Too trendy to ever be worn on a campaign trail, but who knows. Anything is possible with the McInsane campaign.

This seems really odd. Take a look at the clothes. They scream NY club scene to me. WTF is going on?


On Edit:
Here's the link for the page with the capes :eyes:

http://web.mac.com/ateliernewyork/iWeb/Site/YOHJI%20YAMAMOTO%20FW%202008.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neshanic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-24-08 09:27 AM
Response to Original message
33. Only one person could pull this off...MUGATU!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yellowcanine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-24-08 09:49 AM
Response to Original message
34. So if they did not spend the money where it said on the finance report, where was the money spent?
This doesn't help McCain campaign at all. Looks as if there are some unexplained expenditures.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-24-08 11:15 AM
Response to Original message
36. Could it be a timing problem?
Where the purchase was in August, but the bill was submitted to the campaign in September.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Overseas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-24-08 11:20 AM
Response to Original message
37. K&R -- more lies they cannot explain. //nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 12:05 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC