Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login

Files on guilty plea won't be unsealed

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
cascadiance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-08-08 02:57 PM
Original message
Files on guilty plea won't be unsealed
Source: San Diego Union Tribune

Financier's case tied to Cunningham
By Greg Moran

March 8, 2008

A federal appeals court has ruled that the reasons why federal prosecutors in San Diego wanted to keep secret the guilty plea of a New York financier involved in the Randy Duke Cunningham scandals will remain sealed.

In a brief, unpublished memorandum issued Tuesday, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals said there is no public right to access transcripts of hearings in which prosecutors explain to a judge their reasons for seeking secrecy.


Kontogiannis is awaiting sentencing. Cunningham pleaded guilty and is serving an eight-year, four-month sentence in federal prison. Wilkes was found guilty and was sentenced last month to 12 years in prison.

An extraordinary curtain of secrecy was drawn over the Kontogiannis appellate proceedings. The judges ordered all the briefs to be filed under seal, the court docket for the case was not published, and the hearing where the government pleaded its case was closed.

Read more:

So, once again, the government is quietly covering up the truth, and I believe the truth that America MUST know to know the extent of the evil that has infected it! Look at this speculation thread on the secrecy here on the Next Hurrah, which suspects, as I do, that there is something very sinister about the way the government was working with Kontogiannis on money laundering likely for the CIA:

To give you an idea of how evil it is, the article doesn't mention here that even though the media has been all but completely blocked to information on this trial, apparently the judges feel that CRIMINAL Brent Wilkes and his lawyer is entitled to review this secret information for themselves when the rest of us aren't! HUH? That to me is a sign that our government has become totally bankrupt and are hiding a conspiracy that probably is an order of magnitude worse than even Watergate was!

What is wrong with this picture? EVERYTHING!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-08-08 03:02 PM
Response to Original message
1. Not so shocking when we think of how long the right-wing has been filling
the courts with their fellow thugs ---

What the Supreme Court --- Gang of 5 --- did in 2000 should make that clear to us --
and the Bush/DOJ attack on 8 of their own AGs who wouldn't do their dirty work should make
that even clearer!!!

Yet, we still expect justice . . . ??? !!!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
thunder rising Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-08-08 03:07 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Hey, he's just a hard working judge wanting to keep his job. (Nothing to see here)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
QUALAR Donating Member (94 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-08-08 05:40 PM
Response to Original message
CHENEY minus $140,000 to CONTRACTOR minus $140,000 to buy CUNNINGHAM Boat = IMPEACHMENT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Usrename Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 01:04 AM
Response to Original message
4. K&R
Culture of corruption.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Oct 18th 2017, 03:40 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC