Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Colorado's Republican Sec. of State Decertifies E-Voting Machines After Failed Testing

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
BradBlog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-17-07 06:52 PM
Original message
Colorado's Republican Sec. of State Decertifies E-Voting Machines After Failed Testing
Source: BRAD BLOG

BREAKING: Colorado's Republican Sec. of State Decertifies E-Voting Machines After Failed Testing
All Voting Systems by ES&S Completely Decertified; DRE Touch-Screens from Sequoia Banned; Optical-Scan Paper Systems by Hart InterCivic Banned; All Systems by Diebold/Premier Conditionally Allowed for Use!

SoS Admits Federal Certification Process, Now Overseen by Former CO SoS on Behalf of EAC, 'Has Been Very Weak to Date'...

Colorado's Republican Secretary of State, Mike Coffman, has announced that a number of Colorado's e-voting machines have failed state certification testings, and will not be allowed for use in the 2008 election cycle. The announcements came at a news conference in Denver which completely just minutes ago.

Describing the state's testing of four major voting machine companies previously certified in the state, Coffman explained to reporters at the presser that there were "over 3000 tests on each vendor's systems, and over 40,000 pages documenting the tests."

"This has been an extensive process," he said, after detailing several remarkable findings from each of the systems testing. For example, test results showed that paper-based optical-scan systems made by Hart InterCivic "could not accurately count ballots." While Direct Recording Electronic (DRE, usually touch-screen) systems made by ES&S, the world's largest supplier of voting systems, could be disabled by "denial of service" attacks at the pollng place with a device as simple as a magnet.

"If you were to put a magnet in close proximity or inside the port," Coffman said at the press conference today, "that would, infact, disable that particular voting machines and it would have to be literally reprogrammed...to bring in back into circulation for that election."

While virtually all of the systems tested were found to have major vulnerabilities, a number of them were "conditionally certified" for use as long as new security mitigation requirements are met. Notably, both op-scan systems and DREs made by Diebold (now known as Premier) were given conditional certification for use, despite Diebold systems having been banned in several states previously, including California, Ohio and Florida, due to a long list of critical vulnerabilities....

A summary of the decertified and conditionally certified systems follow (links to more information on each, at the end of the article)...

FULL STORY: http://www.bradblog.com/?p=5451


Read more: http://www.bradblog.com/?p=5451
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-17-07 06:54 PM
Response to Original message
1. And Another State Draws Back From the Brink
I think we've got a trend here, folks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xipe Totec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-17-07 07:04 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. You kiddin? Every one decertified BUT Diebold.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rockymountaindem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-17-07 06:57 PM
Response to Original message
2. I bet the Republican leadership isn't impressed with him.
OTOH, Ken Gordon, the Democratic candidate for that post, probably would have decertified them all on general principle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
El Supremo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-17-07 11:02 PM
Response to Reply #2
10. From Ken Gordon>>
Today the Secretary of State announced the result of his electronic voting machine testing. (See press release below.) He decertified electronic voting machines from three of the four national vendors affecting dozens of Colorado counties including Denver, Jefferson, Arapahoe, Mesa and Pueblo.

Tomorrow I am going to hold a legislative hearing where the Secretary of State will present his findings and recommendations. This is the first step toward legislation to ensure that all Coloradans can vote and that their votes are counted accurately.

It is too early to know what legislation will be necessary. I wanted to get this email out quickly because this is a significant event, and I always try to keep the people on my list informed so they can be the first on their block to know.

Sincerely,

Ken Gordon
Majority Leader Colorado Senate
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BradBlog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 01:16 AM
Response to Reply #2
11. And Coffman may be leaving the post entirely soon...

...to run for Tancredo's seat, as I've heard it told.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-17-07 06:57 PM
Response to Original message
3. Never expected to read this. What great news. Thanks. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xipe Totec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-17-07 07:08 PM
Response to Original message
5. Diebold/Premier Conditionally Allowed for Use
I don't think this is good news.

:scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-17-07 07:15 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. What are the conditions?
When hell freezes over?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xipe Totec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-17-07 07:18 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Doubt it
Edited on Mon Dec-17-07 07:19 PM by Xipe Totec
But the rest were UNCONDITIONALLY decertified.

That means Diebold is the ONLY game in town.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MasonJar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-17-07 07:40 PM
Response to Original message
8. The headline was misleading; it made it seem that he had banned the
electronic voting systems. He is still allowing Diebold, the most notorious of all. Handcounted ballots everywhere!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hekate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-17-07 09:34 PM
Response to Original message
9. How many states is this now? When will they all realize they were sold a bill of goods?...
...and an expensive one at that.

While it pleased me that Kitty Pilgrim on Tweety's show actually did a segment on Ohio's voting machines, she used the RW meme "voter fraud", when it's really fraud by vote suppression/voting machinery/vote counting and other means.

I think we are making progress in public awareness, nonetheless, and that's a good thing.

Hekate

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 06:19 AM
Response to Original message
12. All Your Votes are Belong to Diebold. This is NOT actually good, I think. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pleah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 10:22 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. I agree!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 07:37 AM
Response to Original message
13. And to think they called us crazy people for saying Kerry won. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 06:02 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC