Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Taser gets litigious over suggestions the device causes deaths

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Not a robought Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-23-07 04:26 PM
Original message
Taser gets litigious over suggestions the device causes deaths
Source: The Canadian Press

VANCOUVER - Anyone who launches a lawsuit against Taser International Inc. or suggests a Taser electronic device was involved in a death are liable to get another shock when the company brings down the full force of its legal team.

Taser International is currently named as a defendant in at least 39 wrongful death or personal injury lawsuits where a Taser was used.

The company is aggressive in defending itself in such lawsuits and has entered into agreements to prevent its own insurance provider from settling out of court,

It has even filed a lawsuit demanding an Ohio coroner change her conclusion that a Taser was a contributing factor in the deaths of two men.

Read more: http://canadianpress.google.com/article/ALeqM5gW0phZRRqc3h8CzMK97QPg5Q5lGA



If you read further down, amongst the lawsuits against Taser, there are 10 training-injury related lawsuits brought forward by cops.

While we're at it, can we also argue that there are no deaths attributed to smoking cigarettes? It's lung cancer, stroke and heart disease that kill people - not cigarette smoking.

:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Bitwit1234 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-23-07 04:37 PM
Response to Original message
1. Stop and think
You have the ability to start smoking. You do it on your own, BUT, it does become addictive. Now being ta sered is not voluntary. You are ta sered usually by some form of law enforcement and in a heck of lot of cases, for some infraction, OR NOT, that was trivial. Some people might be allergic, some people might have a medical condition. How would the law enforcement know that.

I think, that law enforcement officers, should be told, and it should be enforced that if a person is ta sered, and there is injury they will be fired and they will be responsible for the ensuing law suit.

I know that there are exceptions. But there are so many other peaceful resolutions that ta sering is not usually necessary.

Esample, my son is 6'2" weights close to 200 and looks healthy as can be. But he is diabetic, has high blood pressure and a heart condition. How would you know that. By looking at him you wouldn't so tasering should be a very last resort and only if a person is violent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Not a robought Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-23-07 04:44 PM
Response to Original message
2. Ex-Taser worker alleges she was threatened
http://www.canada.com/nationalpost/news/story.html?id=2b3b519c-56ae-402e-bfb2-fd8565ee9c35&k=19086&p=1

Pam Schreiner, who worked for the Arizona-based maker of the electric-shock weapons in 2004, says she was threatened and intimidated, including her home being shot at, after she saw company officials intentionally shredding Taser injury reports during a legal proceeding, according to court documents.

"Since leaving Taser International, I have lived in fear of what Taser International will do to me. The company has enormous resources and connections through law enforcement," Ms. Schreiner says in an affidavit sworn this summer and filed in a court in Georgia.

"I have been verbally threatened by people hired by Taser to harass and intimidate me. I was told by the two Chandler police officers that they had conducted surveillance of my residence, followed me around and gone through my garbage," her affidavit says.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kurth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-23-07 04:51 PM
Response to Original message
3. Everyone knows Robert Dziekanski died peacefully in bed of old age
Edited on Fri Nov-23-07 04:55 PM by kurth
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-23-07 04:57 PM
Response to Original message
4. Suggestions?
:wow:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Akoto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-23-07 05:23 PM
Response to Original message
5. Of course they defend themselves aggressively.
Edited on Fri Nov-23-07 05:25 PM by Akoto
They make their bucks off of selling a weapon which supposedly disables while not killing. Remove the 'not' in that sentence and the company's pitch kinda goes out the window. The taser then becomes a pistol, only you're gambling as to whether each shot is a blank or a bullet.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BadgerKid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-23-07 05:27 PM
Response to Original message
6. Let's see the maintenance records
What if the tasers are operating out of specification to the point that they act like mini-defibrillators? We've all heard of laptop computers catching on fire, so it's possible that portable batteries can be problematic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1monster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-23-07 07:39 PM
Response to Original message
7. S.L.A.P. Typical corporate tactic to prevent the public from having justice or their
Edited on Fri Nov-23-07 07:40 PM by 1monster
day in court.

S.L.A.P.P. = Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 01:16 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC