Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

General: N. Iraq has become more violent

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Eugene Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-19-07 04:51 PM
Original message
General: N. Iraq has become more violent
Source: Associated Press

http://www.armytimes.com/news/2007/11/ap_northerniraq_071119/%2e">General: N. Iraq has become more violent

By Pauline Jelinek - The Associated Press
Posted : Monday Nov 19, 2007 11:47:06 EST

Despite a decline in violence in Iraq, northern Iraq
has become more violent than other regions as al-
Qaida and other militants move there to avoid
coalition operations elsewhere, the region’s top U.S.
commander said Monday.

Army Maj. Gen. Mark P. Hertling said al-Qaida cells
still operate in all the key cities in the north.

“What you’re seeing is the enemy shifting,” he told
Pentagon reporters in a video conference from
outside Tikrit in northern Iraq.

Hertling said militants have been pushed east to his
area from Anbar by the so-called Awakening
movement, in which local tribes have allied with the
coalition against al-Qaida. Others have been pushed
north to his area from the Baghdad region, where
this year’s U.S. troop surge has made more
operations possible.

-snip-

Read more: http://www.armytimes.com/news/2007/11/ap_northerniraq_071119/%2e
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-19-07 04:52 PM
Response to Original message
1. whack a mole n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Teaser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-19-07 05:11 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Once the surge ends...
I really do wonder what people will say as the "moles" go back to their former haunts.

I don't think the violence will ever be worse than it was through most of 2007 (due to the factors we've all discussed before), but it WILL go up. What's strange is that Bush timed the surge to start ending well before he leaves office. That's a lot of months of increased casualty reports.

So, one wonders, why did the adminstration time it such? Why didn't they wait a few more months before starting it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yardwork Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-19-07 04:55 PM
Response to Original message
2. I guess we're going to have to invade it!
Wait.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 05:26 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC