Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

South American nations to launch bank as rival to IMF

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-16-07 04:18 AM
Original message
South American nations to launch bank as rival to IMF
Source: AFP

South American nations to launch bank as rival to IMF
3 hours ago

RIO DE JANEIRO (AFP) — Venezuela's leftist government is leading Brazil, Argentina and other regional economies in creating a new bank with the ambition of casting off unwelcome oversight by the IMF and World Bank.

The idea was first announced by Venezuela's President Hugo Chavez last December as part of his crusade against US influence and international financial institutions that he says are merely "tools of Washington."

The finance and economy ministers of Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Ecuador, Paraguay, Uruguay and Venezuela met last week in Rio de Janeiro to outline the main elements of the "Banco del Sur" -- or Bank of the South.

The lender will provide "a new financial architecture" for development in the region, according to the seven backers, whose initiative comes just ahead of annual meetings of the IMF and World Bank this weekend.



Read more: http://afp.google.com/article/ALeqM5i9GsFWIwxBWFypkOdPGt3aO52-kQ
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
dipsydoodle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-16-07 04:21 AM
Response to Original message
1. "tools of Washington"
sounds about right - too many conditions on loans : mainly ones supportive of corporates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lvx35 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-16-07 04:41 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Tools of Washington? I would say its the other way around at this point...nt
Edited on Tue Oct-16-07 04:45 AM by lvx35
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dipsydoodle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-16-07 07:38 AM
Response to Reply #2
7. Are you saying
that Washington is a tool of the IMF - the converse of what I said ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lvx35 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-16-07 05:14 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. More precisely, Washington is the tool of a global financial elite.
The point being that given a choice between a super rich arab family and American workers, you are more likely to see policy to the benefit of the overseas wealthy than the American poor. I'm only making a comment that its about money, not nationalism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lvx35 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-16-07 04:47 AM
Response to Original message
3. This alternative banking stuff is really exciting to me.
I think there is a lot of potential for new things within this realm, but we've been locked into oligarcy enforced ritual for so long we can't see it. I hope they choose to experiement a little instead of just copying old banking structures.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-16-07 04:58 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. It should be very interesting to watch this year. Here's an article written in May on Banco del Sur:
Nadia Martinez: The World Bank continues in its downward spiraling crisis of legitimacy, at least in Latin America.
From Nadia Martinez at TomPaine.com:

~snip~
Bank of the South

The increasing frustration with traditional multilateral financing options has led some governments to begin thinking about alternatives to fulfill their financing needs, while at the same time breaking their dependence on capital—and influence—from the United States and Europe. At the same time that the World Bank is suffering its most damaging scandal to date, plans for an alternative regional bank are advancing quickly.

Earlier this year, Venezuela and Argentina launched the new “Banco del Sur” (Bank of the South), pledging more than $ 1 billion to get the institution up and running in the next few months. Although the details are currently being worked out (a 90-day deadline has been established to define some basic operating rules) several other countries have agreed to join: Brazil, Bolivia, Ecuador and Paraguay will also be founding members. Additionally, Nicaragua, several Caribbean countries and even a few Asian nations have expressed interest in participating in the new multilateral institution.

The Bank of the South’s creation underscores the severity of the disenchantment with the traditional U.S.-dominated instruments for development finance. From the World Bank to the Inter-American Development Bank (IDB) (which provides financing exclusively in Latin America and the Caribbean), voting privileges are based on financial contribution, which makes the U.S. Treasury the single largest shareholder, bringing with it the largest share of the vote. In the IDB, the U.S. not only “owns” a whopping 30 percent of the vote, but it also holds veto power—an advantage to which no other member is privy.

In a clear departure from this undemocratic and paternalistic governance structure, Banco del Sur promoters assure, as Cabezas has said, that in the new institution “no one will be the sole owner.” Although not fully defined, there has been indication that voting power will be based on financial need, rather than monetary contribution or political weight. But beyond the critical structural and political delineation, the real challenge will be to create an institution that does not only look different than its predecessors but that it actually thinks and acts differently. This means that member countries will need to think long and hard about how development will be defined and how it will best be achieved.
(snip/...)

http://www.alternet.org/blogs/peek/51662/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Trillo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-16-07 01:44 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. “no one will be the sole owner.”?
The U.S.'s historical corporate scheme, emphasis added:
States also limited corporate charters to a set number of years. Unless a legislature renewed an expiring charter, the corporation was dissolved and its assets were divided among shareholders. Citizen authority clauses limited capitalization, debts, land holdings, and sometimes, even profits. They required a company's accounting books to be turned over to a legislature upon request. The power of large shareholders was limited by scaled voting, so that large and small investors had equal voting rights. Interlocking directorates were outlawed. Shareholders had the right to remove directors at will.

http://reclaimdemocracy.org/corporate_accountability/history_corporations_us.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Trillo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-16-07 01:33 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. How alternative is "alternative"?
From the OP's link, emphasis is mine:
"There will not be credit subjected to economic policies. There will not be credit that produces a calamity for our people and as a result, it will not be a tool of domination," said Venezuelan Finance Minister Rodrigo Cabeza.


Article seems devoid of precise details: Will it be state owned or private? Will it be fractional reserve? Will it charge interest?

I'm just trying to figure out how "alternative" this will actually be. Maybe I'm stupid and can't read between the lines properly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JNelson6563 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-16-07 05:32 AM
Response to Original message
5. This is great! The IMF is horrible!
I highly recommend Greg Palast's The Best Democracy Money Can Buy for anyone who needs the scoop on IMF.

Rock on Hugo!

Julie
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lisa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-16-07 08:54 PM
Response to Reply #5
13. and Naomi Klein's "The Shock Doctrine" is also pretty revealing ...
... about what "The Bank" and "The Fund" have been up to, over the past few decades.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JNelson6563 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-17-07 05:40 AM
Response to Reply #13
16. Thanks Lisa, I'll want to read that
:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lisa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-17-07 01:51 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. You might also like Stephen Lewis's "Race Against Time"
Edited on Wed Oct-17-07 01:51 PM by Lisa
He really slams the World Bank's role in Africa. This was my first serious introduction to why those institutions are so controversial today (I wasn't very political before this). And hearing it from a former UN guy ... some amazing stories in there.

(Naomi Klein is married to Avi Lewis, Stephen's son.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fasttense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-16-07 06:21 AM
Response to Original message
6. The IMF and World Bank only grant loans if the country accepts "free trade"
constraints and controls. Their loans come with a whole lot of baggage like privatization of everything the county owns, allowing corporation to steal the middle class blind and moving jobs outside the country. The results are horrible.

It is good to see an alternative to the blackmail of "free trade". I hope Friedman is rolling over in his grave.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The2ndWheel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-16-07 01:52 PM
Response to Original message
10. Well, if the IMF and World Bank have less power, go for it
However, we'll have to wait and see if this new centralized institution is a "tool of domination" or not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peace Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-16-07 08:50 PM
Response to Original message
12. The World Bank/IMF are loan sharks for the global corporate predators.
They take a third world country whose rich elite has already ripped the country off, so that big loans are needed to stay afloat; they impose draconian repayment conditions on the loans, such as defunding of social programs, privatization of services (water systems, transportation, etc.--with big jackups in cost), and also opening of the country to global corporate predator rape (resource extraction; sweatshop labor); the rich then rip off the loan money, and leave the poor to pay the debt. These policies have created many basketcase economies around the world, and enormous suffering of a kind that is difficult to remedy. For instance, opening a country to U.S. agricultural dumping destroys small local farmers; the local food supply and distribution networks are lost; farming skills passed down through generations are lost; and farm land is lost. Further, if there are no resources for education and help to small farms and businesses, a downward spiral is created that is difficult to reverse.

Two prime examples are Argentina and Jamaica--but every third world country that has gone through this has been devastated. Argentina was rescued, in part, by Venezuela--the seed of the Bank of the South. Argentina's economy was a disaster, after years of World Bank/IMF financing, and corporate predation/"free trade." Things were so bad that the people simply revolted. An alliance of the poor and the middle class went round with tiny hammers, and broke every bank ATM display window in Buenos Aires, in protest. Three governments later--in quick succession--they finally got a good leftist government--that of Nestor Kirchner--which promised to get Argentina out of World Bank debt and never get into it again. People began to create their own co-ops and ad hoc economic systems, because nothing was working, and their money was worthless. Venezuela--flush with oil profits, and having a highly successful leftist government with high ideals of Latin American self-determination and regional cooperation, then entered the picture, and bought up some of Argentina's debt on easy terms (terms that promoted, rather than destroyed, social justice programs), and Argentina began to recover. All indicators are now up--it's a great success story. And Venezuela thus not only gave the World Bank/IMF a big black eye, it created a healthy trading partner, for itself, Brazil and other countries. Argentina is one of the best examples of the success of Bolivarian ideas--and was so successful, in fact, that other countries want in. Thus, the current founders of the Bank of the South--Brazil, Ecuador, Paraguay, etc.--who understand the benefit of loaning money among themselves, to get out of foreign debt and re-start their economies on better principles.

I noticed that Venezuela and Cuba are going to help Jamaica build a first class international airport, to assist with tourism. Jamaica is a harrowing disaster of World Bank/IMF financing and "free trade." I saw a documentary in which old farmers were weeping at the devastation wrought on them by U.S. ag dumping. All they wanted to do was farm--to feed their local communities with fresh produce--and to pass their skills along to their children. They had lost everything. And the bastards who had incurred the loans, and the ag dumping, also had created a "free trade zone," on the docks, where products are manufactured OUTSIDE of Jamaican jurisdiction--no labor law enforcement, no taxes--placed directly on tankers and shipped away. If Jamaicans want jobs, they can go work in these sweatshops for shit wages, with no labor protections.

There is quite a huge small farmer movement, worldwide, which has shown its collective power at WTO meetings and elsewhere. One South Korean farmer committed suicide at the WTO meeting in Cancun, a couple of years ago--in despair, and in protest. There have been thousands of such suicides in third world countries. But the collective effort to reverse global corporate predator incursions has been effective and successful, in some places. The small farmer movement is a big factor in South American politics.

As Argentina's recovery was the seed of the Bank of the South, the Bank of the South is the seed of something bigger--a South American "Common Market" and common currency are being discussed. That's where it's all aiming--at Latin American SELF-DETERMINATION--the dream of Simon Bolivar, the revolutionary hero who freed South America from colonial rule, and for whom the Bolivarian Revolution is named. These developments in South America are going to profoundly affect us here in the United States--mostly for the better, I think. It's time that we, as a country, re-committed ourselves to non-monopolistic, non-predatory "fair trade." We were once a country of small businesses, that underwent periodic "trust-busting" reforms, on the principle of a truly free market--one without global corporations and monopolies. Financial power concentrated in too few hands has always been anathema to us. The global corporate predators who rule over us now have hijacked our election system--with electronic voting machines, run on 'TRADE SECRET,' PROPRIETARY programming code, owned and controlled by rightwing Bushite corporations--and have frozen their overweaning power in place, completely preventing desperately needed reform. It's time to bust them again. And, in order to do that, the first thing we must take care of is restoring transparent vote counting (which is still doable, at the state/local level). The South Americans have already done a decade of work on transparent elections and the strengthening of democratic institutions. That's why they are so far ahead of us in dealing with the global corporate predators who operate from our shores, and also in repulsing the fascist and highly corrupt U.S./Bush "war on drugs." Although we may suffer economic hardship, inflicted on us by the global corporate predators, as the South Americans get their act together, in the end I'm sure we will benefit greatly from these examples of successful rebellion, grass roots organization and peaceful, democratic change. If the South Americans can do it--after all they've suffered--so can we.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Theres-a Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-17-07 07:33 AM
Response to Reply #12
17. Life and Debt
That's the name of the Jamaica documentary. It was so sad. I remember thinking,that's what they want to do here. They are devaluating our currency,all the jobs suck,and not many people can afford "US made" products.It's all a big monopoly game.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FiveGoodMen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-17-07 05:16 PM
Response to Reply #12
21. IMF dirty MF
takes away everything it can get
always making certain that there's one thing left
keep them on the hook with insupportable debt

-- Bruce Cockburn, 'Call it Democracy', 1985
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UGADUer Donating Member (161 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-16-07 08:55 PM
Response to Original message
14. I expect the US Government to respond with a wave of PR attacks against it
A bipartisan assault, as is the usual. AFL-CIO will make some noise but eventually they will be put down by committee chairs. Maybe teams of assassins will make sure a few of the people organizing the new bank end up in plane crashes and boat sinkings. And the world will go on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hydra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-16-07 09:12 PM
Response to Original message
15. The IMF has to stamp this out fast
Because most of their power has been based on the idea that they were the only ones with this type of capital, other than some of the superpowers. As soon as there are other options, they'll have to compete...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aggiesal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-17-07 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #15
20. Look for Washington to step up efforts to remove ...
Chavez from Venezuela.

He is really starting to be a threat and a thorn to the Washington elite.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hydra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-17-07 05:22 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. Absolutely
If I were Bush, it would piss me off to no end that this guy within spitting distance of the US is insulting me in front of the UN, resisting being ousted, lending money to the former tinpots in our hemisphere and generally unraveling years of subjugation done by the US...and my army is tied up in the Mid-East, so I can't scratch this abominable itch.

Expect the scratch to be rather harsh, when it finally comes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-17-07 08:15 AM
Response to Original message
18. Very interesting.
Wish progressives in the US had enough cash to do the same.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 08:11 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC